Rasmussen Report
28% of the nation's voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -12. That's the lowest rating yet recorded for President Obama.
Sixty-one percent (61%) of voters say the country is moving down the wrong track, down two points from last week.
28 comments:
This is not counting the 33% who are afraid to say they are against him because liberals will call them racists.
This with 70% of the alphabet media's stories being pro-Obama-health-care.
Sark
Would this be typical Republican fussy math?
Fussy? Liberal POV proud of Obamas' popularity before now refutes the accuracy of the same numbers he has used in the past. telling is it not?
Oatz
I'm referring to Sark's math, he pulls it out of thin air just like Ann Coulter and Rush.
GOP opinions are not facts.
How ironic! According to today's NBC poll, only 28% of the public approves of the Republics.
But then, polls only matter when you see them to your advantage. Don't let the balloons drop from the ceiling just yet.
"The game's afoot." - W.S.
Hence the name WATAUGA Conservative, BikerBard please keep up those darn cliff notes not painting the whole picture.
Armed Government unarmed Americans....
Hey Gateway Pundit.
I attended the town hall event in Bristol,VA today. Though very few were allowed inside, there was an amazing turnout outside of people protest healthcare reform, among other things. I hope to send you pictures soon of some great signs I saw. It was expected that those in opposition to the bill would outnumber those in favor by 10-1, but I feel it was much, much more.
I do have a question I was hoping you could answer. During the motorcade when the president was arriving, there were several vehicles following the limo that contained the secret service. All of the vehicles had all the windows rolled down, and back hatch open on the SUVs with the men holding their, I assume assault rifes, machine guns, drawn on everyone lining the streets. Needless to say it took my breath away at the sight of them, and made my friends and I dizzy with fear. I have seen the secret service before, but never like this. While they were intimidating, I never felt in danger. The guns were not drawn when the motorcade was leaving the event. But I turned on a local talk radio program as we were leaving and all the calls were about witnessing the guns being pointed at them and nothing else until the end of the program.
Having said all that, my question is, is this normal protocol during such an event? It very well could be, but after I had to get over the shock of it, I began to feel offended. We were all there peaceful, and have no problems with Obama the man, we have problems with his policies and wanted him to know the opposition was there to be heard, and know that a strong opposition did indeed exist, and that so many people don't approve of his policies, with this bill in particular.
So, is this normal, and I'm making a mountain out of mole hill, or did they make an exception in this mainly conservative area?
Thanks.
Destiny Baker
Oatz:
Copy and paste, copy and paste, with no original thought, ever.
"A Watauga Wallpaper Hanger"
Oatz
Is the propaganda man.
Oatz-
What the liberal twins are trying to say is - your posted articles have not been approved by the State-Run-Media, therefore they do not exist.
Sark
Is the translation man.
Gregg:
Back up some and wipe Sark's brown smear from your nose.
"Bloggers are mostly polite and respectful to each other. No 'liberals' hover here, calling names, ridiculing you, personally." - BikerBard July 17, 2009 10:16 PM
Guy Faulkes tried to warn us about BikerBard... I should have listened. No substance, just emotions and insults... just a liberal.
Yea, the hate is just bigger than they are. Sad.
Gregg:
So happy to see you follow me so closely. You can quote me, too (I feel so honored.) Must be from your shadowing so many people on the blogs, which was the point I made re: you & Sark. Faulkes has that problem, too.
Try to think for yourself. You don't need to parrot Sark, or Michael Steele, or Rush.
PS: I don't speak for "liberals." I speak for me.
Oooo that's gotta hurt BikerBard, you seem a bit sensitive. Here's the thing, I just used your own words to hang you. Evidence and logic aren't arrows in your quiver so you hurl more insults. Fine. No surprise.
http://bedlammagazine.com/files/ images/news/Obama-socialism_0.jpg
Obama wants to spend $100 Million to renovate a prison in Michigan to house the prisoners at GITMO.
If they estimate $100M that means $200M minimum.
All of that rather than just admit he was wrong about GITMO in the first place. An ego run amuck with other people's money.
Last updated: 4:29 am
August 2, 2009
Posted: 3:35 am
August 2, 2009
AS if the announcement this week that actor Josh Brolin will play an evil short seller in the sequel to the movie "Wall Street" wasn't enough of a contrarian signal to go long on stocks, what about this?
History shows that when the approval rating for a US president dips below the magical 50 percent mark, it is also typically the time to buy.
Let the Obama rally begin!
Gregg:
Wow. You hanged, me all right! I'm hurt, I'm hurt! I'm hung, I'm hung! Quoted me, turned it on me. Called me "sensitive." You da man!
The amazing part was that you did it all yourself, and didn't seek approval from Sark. Baby steps Gregg, baby steps.
I couldn't ever hang you, Gregg. Your words are so insignificant that I couldn't attempt to quote you. Sorry - you just don't say anything that memorable.
BikerBard could leave this Blog and go back to Watauga Watch Blog and the average IQ would rise on both sites.
"I couldn't ever hang you, Gregg." - BikerBard
I guess that's the point isn't it? To this point you haven't. I can't find a single refutation of anything I (or anyone else for that matter) have written. I'd like it if you would, I enjoy honest debate as a way of convincing and learning.
BTW, technically I didn't hang you I just gave you the rope and you did it yourself.
Who is reading this for you?
BikerBard could leave this Blog and go back to Watauga Watch Blog and the average IQ would rise on both sites.
Blogger should always allow POV and BikerBard to comment on this site. We have nothing to fear from them and little to learn as neither has ever won a debate, to my knowledge. Banning them from the blog would be an admission of fear such as Watauga Watch has apparently done with a blogger calling himself Rodger Young. RY uses an abrasive style in his correspondence, but he always backs what he says up with facts and research. Watauga Watch could not stand the combination so they apparently banned him. At his worst, RY has never been more abrasive than POV or BB.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqfuZ7hiap0&feature=topvideos
Look at this Sark.
Reader-
It is the Czar part of your video that says it all. Combine that with Obama moving the US Census in to the White House and they have a system making the Soviets jealous.
Sark:
He's sarcastic! He's oh so clever!
He's obviously askeered of dissent.
You are all so right, and so morally superior. I'm in awe of you! LOL!
(You just TALK a good game.)
BikerBard,
I don't think it's "sarcasm" if it's true. For "askeered of dissent" see Spector, Sebilius and Doggett on other treads. I agree with you on the "morally superior" and "clever" part.
Post a Comment