This blog originally founded by Blogger who holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

First Women


Left to  right - Princess Letizia of Spain, French first lady Carla Bruni, and American Food Policewoman

46 comments:

Liberal POV said...

Blogger

When did you get to be such a petty old fart?

All the real problems facing America and you choose to waste blog space on non issues?

This is the conservative way?

oatz said...

Liberal POV how about an up or down vote on the $1.1 Trillion dollar omibus spending bill at 1924 pages is $575 Billion per page with 6,600 + earmarks, when on November 13, 2010 President Obama once again stated he wants to eliminate earmarks. This is inspite of Congress failing to pass 12 different spending bills trys to jam it all in one bill going into Christmas Break as a Lame duck Congress. DEFEND that Liberal POV.

Liberal POV said...

Oatz

What do you think the republicans would do if this were reversed? What would you want them to do?

Sarkazein said...

Yeah, but look at those sexy arms????????

Sarkazein said...

I may become a Socialist.

Anonymous said...

OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!!

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Sheep POV said:

"All the real problems facing America"

We feel the same way about Hussein Obama's wife calling for state intervention into a parent's choice of how to care for their children. With real problems facing America, the last thing we need is another government solution. How about investigating ACORN and the pedophilia incident you support so firmly? (although you don't seem to want to support that anymore). LOL!!!!

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

Honest Debate said...

"All the real problems facing America and you choose to waste blog space on non issues?" -LiberalPOV

As Blogger wrote Michelle Obama is the new "American Food Policewoman". She asked for it. It is not a non issue when the first lady (not elected) is trying to supplant parents. It's hideous and unamerican.

It's hypocritical for sure but I'm not big on hypocrisy. Who better to warn us about obesity than a woman with a butt like that? However, you'd think if she is going to say childhood obesity is a National security threat then she should set a better example.

Aside from the wide load, look at the slumped shoulders. Her posture is awful. That's fine and my only point is she is human while being portrayed as angelic. Not so.

Petty? Yes. Fun? Absolutely! Lighten up.

Wolf's Head said...

Last time I saw a load that wide it had an orange triangle on it and flagged escort cars in front and behind.

guy faulkes said...

Michele's bubble butt does not bother me. Having a First Lady with a pin head does.

oatz said...

Lets See Liberal POV since you fail to take a stand on the Democratic President Obama Lying AGAIN and the Democratic Congress ignoring the Consitution! All spending(appropriations) bill must START in the HOUSE since its the peoples money( the Senate is supposed to represent the State(s)as a whole).

What would Republicans who just were told in the last election(by the voters) "WE reject your policies! Since the voters voted the Republicans back in they ARE asking for an up or down vote on each of the 6600 earmarks so they can be debated in front of the people and voted on for their merits or lack of. I seem to recall a canadite Obama promising debate on CSPAN for Healthcare another broken promise, HEll flat out LIE! Liberal POV wheres all that righteous anger directed toward him for lying?

Sarkazein said...

Next Michele will be asking for tax money to promote her "Be Proud of America Now That My Husband Is The President Act"

Sarkazein said...

Michele may start a fight against Anorexia when she sees this picture. She will be fighting NOT eating enough and NOT eating too much. She sees herself as just right. Give her another $4.5 Billion to convince you.

Reader said...

I take it you guys don't like a little "junk in the trunk"?

Liberal POV said...

HD

"As Blogger wrote Michelle Obama is the new "American Food Policewoman". She asked for it. It is not a non issue when the first lady (not elected) is trying to supplant parents. It's hideous and unamerican. "

Petty? Yes. Fun? Absolutely! Lighten up.

Who footing the bill for this hyping of pettiness and yes a little racism?

Sugar one of Ms Foxx's biggest political donators?

The junk food industry?

Do you cultist ever take a position that doesn't favor the greedy American corporate community? Do you think the hundreds of millions the billionaire put into propaganda may have some effect on your political thinking as they fund all of your sources of information.

CNSNews.com
Media Research Center
Fox News
Rush
Beck
Newsmaxs

CNS News is a lobby group.

guy faulkes said...

"La La La La La" - Liberalproverbs18:2

No response necessary.

Sarkazein said...

Racism the commie race baiter claims. It is NOT racism of course, it is hypocrisy and meddling and narcism... or liberalism.

Sarkazein said...

Reader- It is Michelle that doesn't like "a little junk in the trunk" and she is spending billions to prove she is against it. Or maybe that is where she is hiding the billions in twenty dollar bills, in her pants pockets.

Liberal POV said...

Blogger

Have you seen the women in the Tea Party Mob?

How about that Ms Foxx?

Sarkazein said...

POV- Show me a link where one (Tea Party woman) is asking for money to tell you how and when to eat and how and when to feed your children. Show me one that is saying the government must be the parent. The head Tea Party woman could be two axe handles wide and wouldn't matter if she wasn't trying to tell others and their children how to eat, and taking tax money to do it.
Do you really not understand this, or is it an act of some kind?

Sarkazein said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sarkazein said...

Deleted my own duplicate above. I am trained to double tap.

guy faulkes said...

Sark, I will see your double tap and raise you a failure drill. Two to the body, one to the head.

oatz said...

Thanks! Liberal POV for taking a stand and calling out President Obama for lying again, your courage is remarkable (NOT!)

Liberal POV said...

Oatz

I don't watch the same hate cesspool of misinformation you do.

Sorry if I don't share your prospective.

Question for you.


Why would you not want a publicly traded corporation to pay a wage the workers and their family could live modestly on rather than your tax dollars having to make up the difference?

Wolf's Head said...

Wonder if the Euro Babes have a calender out?

It is that time of year again....

Reader said...

Sark, I was kidding. The thing with me anymore, I don't take well to being told what to do and what not to do, especially by the government. There's quite a few laws I don't agree with and don't abide by anymore.

I'm a tea party supporter Lib and I'm not overweight, lean more toward under at this point. Foxx is not the first lady, trying to pass a law for over eating. This is the point of Bloggers post.

Liberal POV said...

Reader

"Foxx is not the first lady, trying to pass a law for over eating."

Back this comment up with facts.

What she is trying to do is doing something to counter the greedy Junk food and high sugar and corn syrup industries attack of American children.

Reader do you ever go against the billionaire's lobby?

oatz said...

Hate cesspool? Simple question President Obama on every news channel on November 13, 2010 said AGAIN, he wanted to ban ALL earmarks! But once again its just words from him just words no substance. And you could care less because its Obama had Bush said this you and every network would be calling for his resignation. Your lack of intestinal fortitude is incredible.

Liberal POV said...

Oatz

The president didn't put the earmarks, many were put in by Republicans. Nothing will change when Republican take control and it was even worst when Bush was President.

Where's all that talk about debt reduction from Republicans now?

guy faulkes said...

If Obama was truthful, he would immediately let it be known that he would veto this atrocity because of the earmarks. He is a liar so no veto is forthcoming.

oatz said...

So lying is OK with you? Thank you for clearing that up.

Liberal POV said...

Oatz

Like I said


Sorry if I don't share your prospective.

Two Questions for you now.

What is it you want President Obama to do? Veto? He negotiated with the Republican, I'm against the tax cut for the billionaires which cost for more than the earmarks and does little for the economy, at least the earmarks stimulate the economy.


Why would you not want a publicly traded corporation to pay a wage the workers and their family could live modestly on rather than your tax dollars having to make up the difference?

Wolf's Head said...

"The president didn't put the earmarks, many were put in by Republicans." Liberal Parasite.

Lie.

98% 0f the earmarks in the current bill are from Dimocraps.

Liberal POV said...

Wolf

"98% 0f the earmarks in the current bill are from Dimocraps."

When you post something like this post the source the information or misinformation came from. That would be???

oatz said...

I expect him to keep his word, use line item VETO!

Nobody said...

""Foxx is not the first lady, trying to pass a law for over eating."

Back this comment up with facts.

So now Reader has to "prove" to you that Foxx isn't the first lady?!?

Liberal POV said...

Oatz

"I expect him to keep his word, use line item VETO!"

Could he also use that on the tax cut for the rich?

I'm not disagreeing with you here, I'm just not as passionate about it.

He negotiated with the Republicans and gave his word there, I'm against the tax cut for the billionaires which cost for more than the earmarks and does little for the economy, at least the earmarks stimulate the economy.


Why would you not want a publicly traded corporation to pay a wage the workers and their family could live modestly on rather than your tax dollars having to make up the difference?

Wolf's Head said...

"When you post something like this post the source the information or misinformation came from. That would be???" Liberal Parasite

The bill, go read it.

Liberal POV said...

Wolf

"The bill, go read it."

You have read the Bill and done the math using Republican math?

What your really saying is this is your opinion you want to pass off as fact.

guy faulkes said...

Liberalproverbs18:2, does it bother you that the Wolf can read and comprehend the bill when you cannot. Be assured your political masters will tell you what to think about it shortly. We all know how the prospect of original thought distresses you.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

I didn't ask Wolf if he could read I ask if he had read the bill and did all the math necessary to arrive at his figure?

I betting no the figure is an opinion not fact.

guy faulkes said...

I did not comment on what you asked. I commented on your lack of ability to think for yourself.

I do not know if the Wolf has read the entire bill or not. I suspect he has read part of it.

It does not matter. The earmark bill has been withdrawn by Reid as the liberals could not pass it in time and they did not want to face the repercussions on passing it if they could have.

Johnny Rico said...

Those two on the left make me want to revert back to my lesbian side! The thing on the right is enough to make me join a convent.

Sarkazein said...

Johnny Rico- It took me a minute to figure out you were commenting on the picture. Funny. I thought you were referencing the commenters.

Johnny Rico said...

LOL, good one Sark! I hadn't thought of it that way when I wrote that.