Tuesday, April 17, 2012

It's A PETTY Vent Page!.... Vent Page XLIII

Richard Petty and his NR 43 STP Dodge
 VENT PAGE 43....and when the number "43" comes up...it can ONLY mean one thing! That's right, NASCAR'S King Richard and the nr 43 that he made his own! Seven time winner of NASCAR championship! 200 Career wins!

And now, he's our honoree commemorating VENT PAGE 43....Who woulda thought? 43 Vent pages!

Whenever the number of posts on a vent page make it cumbersome to navigate, a new vent page is started. This is number FORTY-THREE  in our series! Another world record!

VENT PAGES are handy for posting of off-topic posts, rants, raves, rages, etc which might not be appropriate on other threads where adults are having serious discussions. Childish rant? Need to call another poster a name?Just feel like spouting off? Or even if you have something to say and there doesn't seem to be any other logical place to say it....THIS PAGE IS FOR YOU!!


and, while it is in fact a "Petty" vent page...we also have to make mention of one of the most succesful vehicles of all time! Started at Bantam, next to Ford and finally to Willys - Very few American automobiles were produced in the war years - a few for government use but manufacturing plants were mostly dedicated to producing war materials. This 43 Willys Jeep helped win the war!

114 comments:

Anonymous said...

THE KING OF NASCAR WHEN HE WAS RUNNIN....MYBE OLE DALE SENIOUR PICKED UP A LITTE OF THE GLORY IN HIS DAY! aND, OF COURSE, jUNIOR jOHNSON WILL ALWAYS BE "DA MAN !

Anonymous said...

I quit following NASCAR after the Yankees took it over!

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous- I guess that means you don't go to the South anymore too?

NewGuy said...

ALSO a big thanks to some of the oher legends of the early days....Freddy Lorenzon, Bobby Jahns, Red Farmer, Fireball Roberts, Lee Petty, Curtis Turner, Buck Baker, Cotton Owen, and lets not forget Bobbie and Donnie Allison!

Lot's of greats! While Alabama, Florida and Georgia all have their claims to Nascar beginnings, it alwasy seems like North Carolina is home of the sport. At least it does do me!

Anonymous said...

that jeep is a winner too! Thanks Newguy.

Johnny Rico said...

Richard Petty will always be the king of Nascar. He raced in the pre-restrictor days when the sport was still proletariet in nature. The others that New Guy mentioned were giants of a bygone era as well. Good vent page.

Johnny Rico said...

Any news on the illegal aliens arrested a few weeks ago for trying to incite gang violence at the high school? This was a first for Watauga County, and no one seems to notice. When in the history of Watauga County Schools has gang violence been an issue?

Enter illegal aliens who will radically change American culture and, presto!, you have gang violence and many other gifts from uneducated, disease ridden, welfare using criminals (illegal aliens).

And where is the great Sheriff Hagaman on this issue? In fact, where is the press on this issue? In fact, where is Watauga Watch on this issue? Oh thats right, I forgot, if one ignores a problem it goes away. Unless it has to do with American citizens and then the Sheriff will come out guns a blazin!! Remember when Sheriff Hagaman wrote the County Commissioners to ban hunting on Sundays?

So lets get this straight - illegal aliens get a free pass once again, and American citizens get the full measure of a liberal sheriff's inbred hatred for personal responsibility? Does that sound right to you?

And you musn't forget the metal detectors in the courthouse. The Sheriff took deputies off the street (ones that should be chasing illegal alien gang members) and put them in the courthouse to restrict YOUR freedom. Amazing isn't it? Illegal aliens get a pass and YOU DON'T.

Feels good doesn't it?

Sarah Greer-Hodges

Johnny Rico said...

GSA scandal and Secret Service Agents victimizing women and Hussein Obama gets a pass again. Same for Fast and Furious.

Anonymous said...

Maybe they can transfer those SS agents to the Clinton detail?

Sarkazein said...

CLINTON (either one)

NewGuy said...

Good one Sark!

Anonymous said...

Sark, just want you to know that I am from and live in the South, and as Cale Yarborough's cousin, I have a connection with NASCAR's Southern roots.

Johnny Rico said...

Will the Watauga County Board of Commissioners raise the issue of illegal alien gang members in Watauga County? What about the Boone Town Council? If not, it would be interesting to hear why.

Commissions and Councils aren't used to having to answer to consituients though, so we'll probably never know why they do (or don't do) what they do.

Illegal alien gang members are threatening YOUR children, and you aren't ready to deport the thugs yet? A kid carries a bb gun to school and it's like the world is ending. The priorities of Watauga County sheeple provide an interesting insight into how madmen like Hitler or Stalin are able to take over so easily.

Illegal aliens are ready to kill their children, and they remain silent. A law to allow Sunday hunting however, brings out the politicians in droves. Remember, Cullie Tarleton and Len Hagaman (both liberal socialist sheep) wanted to restrict a US CITIZEN's right to hunt in Watauga County on Sundays. Yet they say absolutely nothing about illegal alien gang members plotting violence on US citizen children.

MS-13 is licking their chops at a permissive climate like Watauga County.

Amanda Hays-Cooper

Johnny Rico said...

Where's the dear old chap Rainsford on this illegal alien issue? Well Rainsford, what think you? LOL!

On guaarrrdd Rainsford........

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous- Me too, some of my kin are from Lynchburg. I still watch NASCAR.

Sarkazein said...

A TRILLION dollars a year spent on fighting poverty. Since Johnson's Great Society, TRILLIONS spent to lower the percentage from 19% to 15%. The jail and prison population has gone up at least that much, so there is probably more in poverty now than pre-government help.

Johnny Rico said...

Funny how Foreign Aid and Illegal Aliens are absent from any Presidential debate. And I'm supposed to be excited about any candidates for President? More status quo coming.....

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist sheep,

How come South Africa gave up nukes just prior to ending apartied? Still waiting on an answer to that one. LOL!!!

Your ole pal

Sarah Smith-Johnson-Hays

Johnny Rico said...

Go Ted Nugent!!! He keeps telling them like it is!!!!!

Johnny Rico said...

Still no feminest groups or liberals speaking out against the Secret Service idiots who victimized women in Colombia. Why is that? LOL!

Sarkazein said...

$800... sounds like the young working lady tried to victimize the agent.

Anonymous said...

Johhny Rico, It appears that the color of the people taking over the government from the Apartheid government is not the only reason for South Africa dismantling of it's nuclear program. It looks like terrorism and Communism were also the prevailing reasons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

Dismantling

South African forces feared the threat of a "domino effect" in favour of Communism, represented in southern Africa by Cuban proxy forces in Angola and threatening Namibia. In 1988 South Africa signed the Tripartite Accord with Cuba and Angola, which led to the withdrawal of South African and Cuban troops from Angola and independence for Namibia.
Another possible motivation for eliminating nuclear weapons in South Africa was the probability of an ANC government in the near future.[citation needed] The ANC was listed as a terrorist organisation by the USA,[24][25][26][27] and it had a long history of co-operation with leaders like Muammar Gaddafi and organisations such as the PLO.[28][29] The pre-emptive elimination of nuclear weapons would "make a 'significant contribution...toward peace, stability and progress,'" improving South Africa's relations with and restoring their credibility in regional and international politics. Reiss also states the opinion that the white government greatly feared the unpredictability of a black government inheriting nuclear technologies.[citation needed]
South Africa dismantled its nuclear weapons program in 1989. All the bombs (six constructed and one under construction) were destroyed and South Africa acceded to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty when South African Ambassador to the United States Harry Schwarz signed the treaty in 1991. On 19 August 1994, after completing its inspection, the IAEA confirmed that one partially completed and six fully completed nuclear weapons had been dismantled. As a result, the IAEA was satisfied that South Africa's nuclear program had been converted to peaceful applications. Following this, South Africa joined the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) as a full member on 5 April 1995. South Africa played a leading role in the establishment of the African Nuclear Weapons Free Zone Treaty (the Treaty of Pelindaba) in 1996, becoming one of the first members in 1997. South Africa also signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1996 and ratified it in 1999.
The Treaty of Pelindaba came into effect on 15 July 2009 once it had been ratified by 28 countries.[30] This treaty requires that parties will not engage in the research, development, manufacture, stockpiling acquisition, testing, possession, control or stationing of nuclear explosive devices in the territory of parties to the Treaty and the dumping of radioactive wastes in the African zone by Treaty parties. The African Commission on Nuclear Energy, in order to verify compliance with the treaty, has been established and will be headquartered in South Africa.[31]

George said...

Right on Johnny! 130 million illegals in this country. They'll be taking us over sooner rather than later!

NewGuy said...

This latest Ann Colter column reminds me of what Johny Rico has long been saying....


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=50941

Lennie said...

Here's what's coming.

Sarkazein said...

Lennie- Absolute Vodka had an ad campaign in Mexico using that map with with the title "The Way Things Should Be". I have not had Absolute Vodka since.

Johnny Rico said...

Nonymouse,

What kind of liberal rag did you steal this garbage from? Cuba and Angola, are you kidding me? Somehow I don't think either qualify as capable of influencing one of a select few nuclear powers you dolt of an idiot.

As for skin color, I never mentioned skin color. Why did you mention it? Are you a racist? I was simply asking the question on why the Aparteid would get rid of nuclear weapons just prior to being swept out of power. For you to bring skin color (typical of a race baiting liberal)into a conversation about nuclear weapons is evident of a serious problem. You need some help.

As for the treaty, of course they signed a treaty, but that still doesn't answer the fundamental question of why they gave up nuclear weapons just prior to apartied ending. Tough question to answer. You skipped around it and managed to say nothing. Kind of like biting through an air sandwhich - no substance.

Anyone care to answer why a post apartied South Africa could not be trusted with nukes? LOL!!!

Your ole pal

Ghram Smith

Johnny Rico said...

Have any liberal socialist sheep watched "No Guns for Negros" yet? Defining the relationship between Democrat induced gun control and slaves and "free" blacks caused the idiot who runs Watauga Watch to ban me from that barely functioning site. Not one liberal socialist sheep was able to refute the time-proven notion that gun control laws are racist in nature.

Shylock (shyster) attempted a comeback once by saying the "No Guns for Negros" video was a "slick piece of propaganda", however he, nor any other liberal socialist sheep, was able to explain how it was propaganda or how it was non-factual in any way. Sort of like the way the dolt Anonymous can't explain why South Africa decided to destroy nukes just before blacks took over the country. LOL!!

One of the main reasons we don't have liberal socialists commenting on this fine site anymore is because they were fluxed at every turn by factual monsters like Wolf's Head, Sark, Guy Faulks, Bushrod, Dog Tom and many others. LOL!!

Blacks with guns suddenly become something far sinister in the eyes of liberals. The n word comes to mind. Look at Gilbert Arenas or Plaxico Burris. They were treated as slave negros by the liberal white man for simply exercising their 2nd Amendment Rights in DC and NYC. They were jailed far longer than most rapists and even some murders for simply possessing a gun (2nd Amendment Right). Now they are beholden to the White Man to speak against the 2nd Amendment as part of their plea deal. Where is Sharpton, Jackson, or Farrakan in all this? Their black brothers are made slaves again by whitey and not a peep. Same for the liberals. Where are you dolting idiots when the black man needs you most. The great Martin Luther King marched to give blacks freedom. Condoleeza Rice's father bore arms against white mobs to give blacks freedom. Liberals are trying to take all this away!

Conservatives are the only group out there defending the rights of black America. Whereas liberal socialists like JW, Shyster, Tricyle Lard, POV and others want to shackle and slave the black man into a former pathetic existance, conservatives work tirelessly every day to free the black man.

Where are most gun bans in the U.S. today? Yep, your right if you said the inner city. And who lives in the inner city? Yep, you guessed right again - the black man. Gun bans unfairly target inner city blacks making victims of the black race time and again. Why does whitey in the suburbs get to possess and bear arms while blackey in the inner city doesn't? Another South African nukes deal perhaps? Can't trust blackey; is that what you liberals are saying? If not then answer me why.

Working to lift these bans will make the enslaved black man equal to whites in NYC, Chicago, DC, Boston and New Jersey. This is what conservative freedom fighters seek to do. And what do liberal socialist sheep like Bloomburg, Romney, Cullie Tarleton, and Sheriff Len Hagaman do? Right again class, they work to enact more racist gun laws that enslave the black man.

What you should remember is once the black man is re-enslaved, your next. This is why conservatives are true freedom fighters in this liberal sponsered war on freedom.

Be interesting to hear something to the contrary. LOL!! The liberal dolts won't touch this one!!!

Your ole pal

Pam Coultier

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

Well all you lazy, mid morning liberals (hard to get up early after a hard night of drugs and immorality), what say you? LOL!!!!

Stings don't it?

Pass the fairness doctrine and you won't have to listen to us freeom fighters anymore. LOL!!!

Your ole pal

Pam Houlter

NewGuy said...

Jesse Jackson on guns...

http://www.governing.com/news/state/ap-jesse-jacksons-coalition-challenges-oklahoma-gun-laws.html

Sarkazein said...

ANY QUESTIONS

Anonymous said...

Johhny Rico, to answer you question the my post is copied from Wikipedia.

I am not sure I would call that resource a liberal rag, any party can post or edit there.

But also any party has the same right to edit anthers post there, so it seems to me to be a fairly reliable source.

I have answered your question in my post. There were several reasons the Apartheid/racist government dismantled their nuclear arms.

Anonymous said...

I like Ted Nugent, but he is wrong about Romney, just like he was when he avoided the draft.

Sarkazein said...

Oh boyeh

Johnny Rico said...

Nonymouse,

You failed to answer my post. Regurgitating statements from Wikipedia is hardly an answer. We already know South Africa gave up nukes you dumb arse. Duhhhhhh!!! My question was why did South Africa give up nukes just prior to Aparteid ending.

You immediately jumped to skin color insinuating blacks couldn't be trusted with nukes. I corrected you (again) and now you take a snippet from Wiki which espouses Angola and Cuba had something to do with the South African decision. What a bunch of BS.

Aside from being a racist who believes a black country cannot be trusted with nukes, your non-answer makes you pathetic. Typical for POV though. LOL!!

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

Benjy Goldeye

Johnny Rico said...

Back to the base question. Can anyone figure out the REAL reason why South Africa gave up nukes just prior to aparteid ending? LOL!! Difficult question to answer ain't it? LOL!!!

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

I also see the dolts were unable to even remotely address my truth post on negros with guns. The truth can be a hard thing sometimes can't it? LOL!!

Liberals run from the truth which is why they've dodged this questionsince 2005. The dimwit blogmaster on the Watch even banned me because I shut his entire site down for a month. The liberals cowered in their slime holes not knowing how to address a truth post. They did the only thing they could do - censor everything they disagreed with.

Hey Shyster, still waiting on the answer to "No Guns for Negros"!! LOL!

Gun laws are racist.

Your ole pal

Clairice Lackman

Johnny Rico said...

I like the Nuge! Ted Nugent has stood for gun rights for years. He is a trapper also.

Johnny Rico said...

Sark,

Your candidate Romney seems to be doing fairly well. Even though I won't vote for him, perhaps he will whip the crap out of Hussein Obama. I hope so.

Johnny Rico said...

Why is moonshine illegal for pesonal use? Are you telling me marijuana for personal use in many states is legal and moonshine isn't? WTF? If a moonshiner pays for all the corn, suger, copper and other materials, then how exactly is he causing a problem. Funny how they will go after a girl making moonshine on her stove and dope smokers aren't touched.

Sort of like illegal aliens getting stopped by the police. Unless they've committed a serious felony, they usually walk. An American citizen will be cited for the least infraction possible. Why the disparity?

Wake up!!!

Sarkazein said...

Johnny Rico- That's all right, you can sit this one out. This will be the biggest landslide (for Romney) in Presidential election history. I am used to doing the heavy lifting for the slackers.

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous- Uncle Ted dodged the draft, but if you were of draft age then (late Sixties Vietnam), LBJ was still in Office. He and the Democrat controlled Congress had so thoroughly politicized and SNAFUed the war, I for one (draft age in 1968) don't hold it against him.
If he were running for President I would be telling a different story. It was a whole different story then as compared to WW2.

Anonymous said...

Johnny Rico, I answered your question twice. But I will play your game, you have asked a question over and over and any answer given to you is dismissed by you as wrong.

So please tell those of us who are obviously lacking the intellectual superiority that you posses.

What is the reason the Apartheid/Racist government of South Africa dismantled their nuclear weapons?

Johnny Rico said...

Nonymouse,

Your such an idiot. I've told you more than twice how you failed to answer the question. I asked WHY South Africa gave up nukes just before the dreaded apartied ended. You never answer the question. Instead you copy/pasted a statement of HOW South Africa gave up nukes (and even this is wrong).

So, for the record, why did Apartied South Africa give up it's nukes before apartied ended? Do you think other nuclear powers might have been a bit worried over the South Africa situation? How Angola and Cuba could have any effect on South Africa is laughable.

Answer the question. Quit dodging the truth. Say what your thinking you dolt.

LOL!! This is most interesting....

Your ole pal

Garret Langston-Marsh

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

Sark,

You just maybe right about the landslide thing. If Hussein Obama keeps flubbing, he might just go down the tubes. I hope so.

I won't be slacking though. I will vote for Ron Paul or Bachman on a write in ballot.

Sark, what will you do if Romney wins and continues big government policies to include confiscating guns? If he follows the model of Rick Perry, things will be just as bad in this country as under Obama.

J.R.

Johnny Rico said...

Ted Nugent is a Patriot. He rocks. Long live the Nuge. As for Vietname service - his contributions to gun rights makes up for it. Looking back on Nam, what a crock. Sort of like what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan - nothing. Wasting lives when the war could be one with very little loss in life. We could bomb Afghanistan and Iraq into oblivion (Taliban included) and win the war in a couple of weeks. Hard for Taliban to operate if there is no infrastructure except for a sheephearder's lean to.

Rock on Nuge!!!! I listened to Cat Scratch Fever at the Wellness Center this morning as I was completing a particularly grueling workout. Nuge must have helped - I've lost a half inch off the waistline and none from my breasts.

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

I'm mad at the Secret Service for allowing agents, on my hard earned taxpayer dime, to hire desperate prostitutes to fulfill their pleasures while away from wives and kids.

Perhaps it's because I'm a women, but this is unacceptable. The prostitutes in central and South America are taken advantage of due to their economic plight. Just think of what happens to the women not good looking enough to attract male customers. They go hungary.

What I find exceedingly appalling is the fact that not one women's rights group that I know of has said anything about Hussein Obama's Secret Service detail to Colombia. I'm pretty mad the president (notice lower case) encourages his security detail to belittle women in this fashion, so why aren't other women speaking out? Whoopie Goldburg, where's the outrage?

I've never engaged in prostitution, but I would if it meant feeding my kids. And feminist groups support, by their silence (watauga watch is silent on this too), Secret Service Agents taking advantage of poor, third world country women on our taxpayer dime? Amazing and sad.

This is very telling of the liberal mindset.

Brushfire, have any words of wisdom on this? LOL!!!

Your ole pal

Gary Gilmore

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

Liberals,

I've posted several topics you're afraid to discuss. I know it eats you alive that your unable to engage in conversation on these topics, but perhaps it's your moral and ethical foundations that need audit. Think about it for a minute. You can't refute anything I've said, not matter how badly you want to.

Therefore, it might just be time to come to our side; the right side and see things as you should. Freedom and personal responsibility are glorious concepts that can put into service immediately. Cast off the chains of servitude and go forth into your communities to make a difference like conservatives do.

I donated $20.00 this morning to USA Olympic Shooters. Stand with me to make this nation strong once again. Together we can take on liberals and other stupid sheep and make the entire world a free zone. Think about it you dolts.

In between my literary bashings, I always offer the olive branch to you dolting idiots in the event you wish to go down the rightous path. Accept this branch and become free. Join with me to build a bright future that I children may take pride in. A future without discrimination, excuses, and class warfare. A future with a Constitution, God and Jesus Christ, and personal responsibility.

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

Have any liberal socialist sheep watched "No Guns for Negros" yet? Defining the relationship between Democrat induced gun control and slaves and "free" blacks caused the idiot who runs Watauga Watch to ban me from that barely functioning site. Not one liberal socialist sheep was able to refute the time-proven notion that gun control laws are racist in nature.

Shylock (shyster) attempted a comeback once by saying the "No Guns for Negros" video was a "slick piece of propaganda", however he, nor any other liberal socialist sheep, was able to explain how it was propaganda or how it was non-factual in any way. Sort of like the way the dolt Anonymous can't explain why South Africa decided to destroy nukes just before blacks took over the country. LOL!!

One of the main reasons we don't have liberal socialists commenting on this fine site anymore is because they were fluxed at every turn by factual monsters like Wolf's Head, Sark, Guy Faulks, Bushrod, Dog Tom and many others. LOL!!

Blacks with guns suddenly become something far sinister in the eyes of liberals. The n word comes to mind. Look at Gilbert Arenas or Plaxico Burris. They were treated as slave negros by the liberal white man for simply exercising their 2nd Amendment Rights in DC and NYC. They were jailed far longer than most rapists and even some murders for simply possessing a gun (2nd Amendment Right). Now they are beholden to the White Man to speak against the 2nd Amendment as part of their plea deal. Where is Sharpton, Jackson, or Farrakan in all this? Their black brothers are made slaves again by whitey and not a peep. Same for the liberals. Where are you dolting idiots when the black man needs you most. The great Martin Luther King marched to give blacks freedom. Condoleeza Rice's father bore arms against white mobs to give blacks freedom. Liberals are trying to take all this away!

Conservatives are the only group out there defending the rights of black America. Whereas liberal socialists like JW, Shyster, Tricyle Lard, POV and others want to shackle and slave the black man into a former pathetic existance, conservatives work tirelessly every day to free the black man.

Where are most gun bans in the U.S. today? Yep, your right if you said the inner city. And who lives in the inner city? Yep, you guessed right again - the black man. Gun bans unfairly target inner city blacks making victims of the black race time and again. Why does whitey in the suburbs get to possess and bear arms while blackey in the inner city doesn't? Another South African nukes deal perhaps? Can't trust blackey; is that what you liberals are saying? If not then answer me why.

Working to lift these bans will make the enslaved black man equal to whites in NYC, Chicago, DC, Boston and New Jersey. This is what conservative freedom fighters seek to do. And what do liberal socialist sheep like Bloomburg, Romney, Cullie Tarleton, and Sheriff Len Hagaman do? Right again class, they work to enact more racist gun laws that enslave the black man.

What you should remember is once the black man is re-enslaved, your next. This is why conservatives are true freedom fighters in this liberal sponsered war on freedom.

Be interesting to hear something to the contrary. LOL!! The liberal dolts won't touch this one!!!

Your ole pal

Pam Coultier

Johnny Rico

Anonymous said...

Johnny Rico I have admitted your so superior to everyone on here that again I ask you, What is the reason the Apartheid/Racist government of South Africa dismantled their nuclear weapons?

Anonymous said...

Uncle Ted dodged the draft. I volunteered for the Marines. I did not think to much of people dodging then or now.

I don't think he would dodge now.

He grew up, but he is still wrong about Romney.

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous- What year did you volunteer for the Marines. Not questioning your service, but was it during the Vietnam War?

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous- During the Vietnam War's last years, the Marines had to draft "volunteers". As I stood in the draft medical screening room in 1968, someone in charge said-- "I need 12 volunteers for the Marines... you, you, you, you... none had their hand up or had taken one step forward. It was a different time. I don't give Ted credit for it, but I don't hold it against him.

Lennie said...

Johnny its pointless. All liberals want to do is take our guns (even water guns), fully institute communism, and outlaw Christianity.

Even Romney. That's why my write-in vote is going to Palin.

Johnny Rico said...

Nonymouse,

I already know I'm superior to you, no need to dwell on it. I asked you to answer WHY South Africa decided to do away with its nukes prior to apartied. You simply told us that they did away with their nukes but never answered WHY. So, for the 5th time, WHY did South Africa do away with its nuke program prior to apartied?

Would South Africa shed nukes if apartied hadn't occured? LOL!! Tough questions, tough questions.

Your ole pal

Sarah Silverstien

Johnny Rico

PS Are you going to resort to racist remarks again like you did in your first post. You know, the one in which you tried tying cessation of South African nukes to skin color. LOL!!

Anonymous said...

Johnny, we have all yielded to your obvious superiority. Any answers given to your question are wrong, according to you. Continually re-asking the question will not result in different answers.

So we are now asking you to bless us with the correct answer to your question. Please educate us, the ignorant masses, as to why South Africa disarmed.

Please share with us the correct answer.

Johnny Rico said...

Nonymouse,

Like liberal pov, you have broken record syndrome. I KNOW I'm superior to you, and I'm mildly surprised you didn't concede that fact first chance. Anyway, tell us WHY South Africa did away with nukes not the fact they did. We already know they did (you history rewriters would love to change that one). So tell us why, why, why, why you dolt of and idiot.

Looks like I'm winning.......again! LOL

Your ole pal

Sarah Jimenz-Frock

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

Nonymouse,

Like liberal pov, you have broken record syndrome. I KNOW I'm superior to you, and I'm mildly surprised you didn't concede that fact first chance. Anyway, tell us WHY South Africa did away with nukes not the fact they did. We already know they did (you history rewriters would love to change that one). So tell us why, why, why, why you dolt of and idiot.

Looks like I'm winning.......again! LOL

Your ole pal

Sarah Jimenz-Frock

Johnny Rico

Anonymous said...

Johnny, apparently I do not know why South Africa did away with their nukes. So again, I ask that you tell me.

Educate me, enlighten me, share that superior knowledge with me.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous- What year did you volunteer for the Marines. Not questioning your service, but was it during the Vietnam War?

1969

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous- That would be a year after Cronkite claimed victory for the North Vietnamese. I see your point, you certainly have the right to hold it against him.
One thing that bothers me about Romney is that he never served and none of his sons have either. It is OK not to have served, but it is a definite mark against a presidential candidate.

Johnny Rico said...

Nonymouse,

No you tell me. I asked the question, and you tried to answer it with a statement of fact that in fact answered nothing. You also alluded something related to skin color. So tell us WHY please. LOL!

Your ole pal
Johnny Rico

Anonymous said...

Johnny, I told you that I don't know.

Why are you refusing to tell me the answer? I seek the knowledge that you have and I obviously lack. Please share with us the answer to your question.

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous- Romney had student deferments and a ministerial deferment. But, there are ministers in the military.
Obama said he never served because there was no shooting war going on at the time. So Romney told the truth and Obama lied. Uncle Ted.. something else all together.

Anonymous said...

Johnny, is this a trick question ala kobayashi maru ?

I do not know the answer and would love to share the knowledge that only you have.

Please enlighten myself as well as the rest of the literate world what the answer to your question is.

George said...

Sark, while we wait with baited breath for Johnny's knowledge, I have a question for you.

While it's your own personal decision whether or not to want military service from a presidential candidate, something you said confused me.

Obama said he never served because there was no shooting war going on at the time. So Romney told the truth and Obama lied.

Obama was too young for Vietnam (he turned 18 in 1979). He was a student from 1979-1983, and again from 1988-1991, so he was a student during the first Gulf War. And finally, Obama was a State Senator/US Senator/US President during the Iraq/Afghanistan wars of late (and too old to enlist in even the Reserves anyway).

How did Obama lie about the "shooting war"? When America was involved in wartime activities, he was either a child, a student, or too old to enlist.

Sarkazein said...

George- There is NO WAY Obama decided not to go into the military "because there was no hot war going on at the time". One would have to believe he had not checked in the newspaper to see if there was a shooting war going on and had to rely on the recruiter he said he saw to tell him there was no shooting war going on.

Obama said-- " Sergeant, I'm here to enlist, what kinda wars you got going on?"
Sergent answered--" None."

Obama said-- "Darn, I was all set to go Rambo on someone! Shoulda checked the paper."

He lied.

Who's this "we" you keep referring to?

George said...

But the only "shooting" war Obama was eligible for occurred while he was a student.

Sarkazein said...

George- You are not getting it. Obama said he went to a recruiter to see about joining the military... he said it.
He said after talking to the recruiter, then realizing there was no shooting war going on, he decided not to join. THAT is Obama's lie. Doesn't matter if there was a war or not.
The military takes lawyers in, the reserve takes students in... he had every chance to join the military. Unless, he had a bogus birth certificate or a forged Selective Service registration, he could have joined. The fact he didn't is OK with me, so why make up a lie when the truth sounds better. Because he lies.

Sarkazein said...

George- It is similar to "I didn't inhale."

George said...

Sark, you're right, I don't get it. And i don't get it because I believe you're being a tad bit dishonest. So let's do this: I'll tell you how I view Obama's response and then you tell me how you got to your conclusion. Here is the actual Obama quote (video here):

GS: Did you ever consider joining the Armed Forces to protect and serve our country? If not, why?

BO: You know I actually did, you know I had to sign up for selective service when I graduated High School, and I was brought up in Hawaii, and I had friends whose parents were in the military, there were a lot of army bases, military bases there. And I actually always thought of the military some enobling and and you know, honorable option, but keep in mind it was 1979, the vietnam war had come to an end, we weren’t engaged in an active, military conflict at that point, so I didn’t think it was option I ever decided to pursue.


I see this as Obama saying he saw military enlistment as option when leaving high school. But he instead chose to pursue higher education. If there had been a major conflict at the time, he would have considered enlistment more seriously. But in the end, he chose not to enter the Armed Forces.

Now tell me, how did that above quote turn into "Obama said he went to a recruiter to see about joining the military... he said it. He said after talking to the recruiter, then realizing there was no shooting war going on, he decided not to join."?

George said...

Sark, you're right, I don't get it. And i don't get it because I believe you're being a tad bit dishonest. So let's do this: I'll tell you how I view Obama's response and then you tell me how you got to your conclusion. Here is the actual Obama quote:

GS: Did you ever consider joining the Armed Forces to protect and serve our country? If not, why?

BO: You know I actually did, you know I had to sign up for selective service when I graduated High School, and I was brought up in Hawaii, and I had friends whose parents were in the military, there were a lot of army bases, military bases there. And I actually always thought of the military some enobling and and you know, honorable option, but keep in mind it was 1979, the vietnam war had come to an end, we weren’t engaged in an active, military conflict at that point, so I didn’t think it was option I ever decided to pursue.


I see this as Obama saying he saw military enlistment as option when leaving high school. But he instead chose to pursue higher education. If there had been a major conflict at the time, he would have considered enlistment more seriously. But in the end, he chose not to enter the Armed Forces.

Now tell me, how did that above quote turn into "Obama said he went to a recruiter to see about joining the military... he said it. He said after talking to the recruiter, then realizing there was no shooting war going on, he decided not to join."?

George said...

Here's the video of the interview question.

NewGuy said...

Military service...You either did it,


or


you didn't.



There is NO in-between. Ted, or Obama.

George said...

New Guy, exactly right.

Obama was asked if ever considered joining the military. He said, yes, it was considered. Obama also said he chose not to pursue that route.

What I'm asking Sark is, where is the lie? Sark seems to view the interview answer quite differently. I'm wondering how/why.

Anonymous said...

Johnny, we're still awaiting your brilliance. Why the sudden silence?

Sarkazein said...

George- I have already seen the video. It is exactly as I said. I didn't quote him other than parody. Mopatopolis asked him "if not why?" Obama answered-- because there was no active (shootin') war goin' on.

You people cut him way too much slack. He's not mentally disabled, quit making excuses for him. Let him at least live on his own actions and record. Treat him like a man instead of your boy.

George said...

Right, so there was no lie. Obama said he considered the military and decided not to.

That's what he said and that's what happened. There are no "excuses", just honesty.

The only lie was yours, "Obama said he went to a recruiter to see about joining the military... he said it. He said after talking to the recruiter, then realizing there was no shooting war going on, he decided not to join."

He actually didn't say that.

guy faulkes said...

I find this disturbing in a way. As I said before, I tried to join the Marines in the same time period as did Anonymous and was refused for physical reasons. Therefore, I have never served in the military.

I am her to tell you Shakespeare's Saint Crispin's day speech is right on the money.

http://www.gonderzone.org/Library/Knights/crispen.htm

Sarkazein said...

George- Mine was parody. Of course he didn't talk to a recruiter. You are making it worse on Obama. If he was telling the truth (considering joining up) then he would have talked to a recruiter. If in real life he didn't even talk to a recruiter, then that part of his story is a lie also. Obama's story is all a lie. Not only did he not consider it, his reason for not joining is a lie. He made that story up out of whole cloth.

Sarkazein said...

George- I am sure NOT going to read either of his auto-biogrphies, perhaps you have. Did you read anything about his serious consideration to join up in either one of his auto-biographies?

George said...

"Mine was parody. Of course he didn't talk to a recruiter." -Sark

Then why would you say he did, and pass it off as fact?

"Obama said he went to a recruiter to see about joining the military... he said it." -Sark

That's what we call A LIE. You lied Sark. Sorry, but you did.

I'm not an Obama supporter, but I also don't lie to further my opinions. You, on the other hand, have no problem recruiting others to your cause through deception and chicanery. It's pretty dishonest and it's pretty sad.

"If he was telling the truth (considering joining up) then he would have talked to a recruiter. If in real life he didn't even talk to a recruiter, then that part of his story is a lie also." -Sark

One can certainly consider joining the military without talking to a recruiter, just as I can consider traveling abroad without speaking with a travel agent, or consider entering college without talking to an admissions counselor. You want Obama to be lying, so you alter the narrative to fit your pre-conceived judgement.

Here's a fact for you: you can oppose Obama without lying.

Sarkazein said...

George- You are not only an Obama supporter, you are an Obama contortionist.
The whole story is a lie. It is sprinkled with con-man BS to cover the lie. The Hawaii thing, the friends in the military thing. It is obvious.

George said...

Sark, without knowing me or my thoughts/positions you have already classified me. Wrongly. Even after I stated not to support our current president. Interesting.

Or is anyone who values honesty now an "Obama supporter"? More distortion to fit your internal narrative, I guess.

I told you that you can easily oppose Obama without lying outright. Fighting with facts and truth furthers the Conservative cause. Playing dirty with lies and deceit ultimately hinders it.

You are clearly an impediment to your own cause. Cheers to you Sark, cheers.

Johnny Rico said...

Nonymouse said:

"Johnny, we're still awaiting your brilliance. Why the sudden silence?"

Nonymouse, calm your non-working arse down, the sudden silence is due to the fact it's Monday and I'm hard at work making money and unfortunatley paying extremely heavy taxes to support liberal washouts such as yourself. Patience is a virtue, even for liberal sheep.

As you were unable to answer WHY South Africa gave up nukes prior to apartied ending, I will do the honor. Normally I don't let liberals off so easy, but your so braindead I couldn't resist. LOL!

South Africa gave up nukes before apartied ended because they had no idea the intentions, intelligence, or machinations of the new government. South African leaders felt idealism not to be a strong indicator of responsibility when it came to possessing and potentially employing nuclear weapons. The landscape of a post-apartied government was unknown, and the unknown was the deciding factor in dismantling nuclear weapons. The pre-apartied South Africans were a very intelligent bunch of gentlemen; it didn't take any convincing from other countries to give up nukes. If you need a more modern example of an unknown government taking power, look no further than Egypt. Egypt under Mubarik was a known factor. The Arab Spring launched Egypt into an unknown realm running the risk of rampant, uncontrollable extremism.

Not to say the United States, France, England and a host of other modern countries weren't "concerned" (why would they be concerned, apartied was the real problem, right?). They felt exactly the same way as South Africa did. The unknown was too great a chance to take with nuclear weapons. As for Angola and Cuba having any effect on the South Africa decision, that's laughable. The South Africans had already made the decision; the babble spewed from those degenerate states was pure grandstanding in front of the international community in hopes of becoming relevant (it didn't work).

So, Nonymouse, now for another million dollar, liberal-hate-to-answer-it-question: is post apartied South Africa capable of possessing nuclear weapons today? Were we all correct in disarming South Africa, or was it much ado over nothing? Also, how has apartied abolishment worked out for South Africa as a whole?

This ought to be interesting. I doubt you will answer it as you've dodged and parried thus far. Tough questions aren't they. Are you feeling uncomfortable yet? LOL!!

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

Jimmy Jedidiah

PS. See, I didn't have to resort to skin color and racism to make a point, AND I answered WHY South Africa gave up nukes.

Johnny Rico said...

Gorgeous George,

Your about an idiot. When you mention truth and Hussein Obama in the same sentence you've turned said sentence into a paradox. Hussein Obama is not even a United States citizen. He lied about his birthplace, and now idiots like you believe it. A sucker born everyday.

Your ole pal

Gary Smith

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

Go Ted Nugent. He is an American Patriot and a hero. He spoke his mind and now liberal America is out for blood.

Johnny Rico said...

Have you seen the sorry post numbers for the whiners over on the watch?

The Watch's first post has 0 comments, the 2nd has a mere 5 comments, the third with 7, the forth with 8 and the fith with 2.

Those losers can't even keep a blog going! This site has 80 comments for ONE thread. That's what open and reasoned discussion is all about. If liberal socialist sheep, like the idiots over on the watch, weren't such extremists, then perhaps someone would listen to their dribble. LOL!!

What a bunch of liberal losers over there on the watch.

LOL!!

Your ole pal

Sam Tillman

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

Still no follow up by the Watauga County Sheriff on the illegal aliens who threatened the lives of American Citizens a couple weeks back. Amazing. Those criminals shouldn't even be here, but not a peep from anyone on that inconvienant fact. When a child is someday harmed by these criminals (illegal aliens), will that wake anyone up?

Liberal Sheriff Len Hagaman and liberal socialist Cullie Tarleton both wrote letters to the old County Commission asking them to vote against Sunday hunting in Watauga County. Have these same two liberal idiots written letters to the new commission regarding illegal aliens threatening violence on US citizen schoolchildren?

Amazing how racist and arrogant liberal Democrats really are. And we want Cullie Tarleton in office voting on ANYTHING. Wake up folks.

Jane Edwards-Andretti

Sarkazein said...

George- Before you run off, show me one time in all of Obama's writing and speaking of himself where he even casually mentioned even a passing desire to join the military other than the Stepanopolis interview.

Anonymous said...

FINALLY!! Our local sage has answered the question!

But why is South African disarmament a liberal-v-conservative issue? Why are you so preoccupied with South Africa?

George said...

Sark, off the top of my head, I don't believe Obama has brought up the issue since. And for good reason. I wouldn't either. Why talk about something that was just a brief consideration thirty years ago?

As New Guy said, when it comes to military service, you either did or you didn't.

Obama didn't, so what is there to talk about?

George said...

Wait a minute......

"Obama said he went to a recruiter to see about joining the military... he said it. He said after talking to the recruiter, then realizing there was no shooting war going on, he decided not to join." -Sark

Then, when called out as a liar....

"Mine was parody. Of course he didn't talk to a recruiter" -Sark

I think we've figured it out now.......Sark works for Fox & Friends!

Anonymous said...

JW on his watauga watch page only seems to post items belittling other people. You don't see much positive there, only 'hate speech' against the various people who don't follow his particular brand of politics.

I thought it was funny when he posted recently about Virginia Foxx "belittling" people.

I posted the following response which he will have to approve before it gets posted - if it ever does.
"I am glad to see you post about "belittling" people. That seems to be what your website is all about. You belittle Foxx at every opportunity and if you look at the various posts you have made it seems that all you do is belittle people."

Lennie said...

The Obamanation didn't join the military because he's an illegal immigrant! Of course, his plan was to infiltrate the American armed forces and violently sabotage from within. But once he found out that he would have to prove citizenship, he ran for the hills. That event probably saved countless lives from his planned violent jihad.

Sarkazein said...

George - The only other lie beside Obama's Rambo wishes is yours. You are an Obama apologist, supporter, and follower.
First you started by excusing his lack of service because of his education/active war timeline. Then you try to take my parody and make it fit your defense of Obama.


Gee, imagine, you hate FOX also. What a surprise.

Sarkazein said...

"Obama said he went to a recruiter to see about joining the military... he said it. He said after talking to the recruiter, then realizing there was no shooting war going on, he decided not to join." -Sark

How many times do you have to read that before you get it?

Anonymous said...

Johnny Rico, Apartheid supporter seems appropriate.

George said...

Sark, I can read all I want, it will still be a lie. He didn't say that. Read the quote. Watch the video.

When did I lie? You excuse Romney's lack of service because of his education, why not Obama's (does it matter, anyways)?

Sark....you lied, blatantly. Just fess-up to it and move on. I don't like Obama, but I still value honesty, if that makes me a terrible person in your eyes, then so be it.

Sarkazein said...

George- So you believe Obama in your defense of him. You believe he considered the military as it related to Stephanopolis's question but decided against it because there was no war going on at the time.

Sarkazein said...

George you wrote- "Sark, off the top of my head, I don't believe Obama has brought up the issue since. And for good reason. I wouldn't either. Why talk about something that was just a brief consideration thirty years ago?"

Key word brief in your attempt to apologize for Obama. He never said brief. You added that term. He was manufacturing his answer to sound like he was a normal guy who considered the military as an option. He flowered his comment up with words like nobility. He is a radical Leftist and never considered joining the US military. He lied.
But it is fun to watch a "non-supporter" of his try and speak for him by adding words.

George said...

How do you know he never considered joining the military? How did he lie?

You lied, we know that. But how did Obama lie in his interview with ABC?

Sarkazein said...

George- I didn't have to witness it to know Clinton did, in fact, inhale. I didn't have to witness it to know, in fact, he did have sex with that woman.

I didn't have to be Obama's phantom recruiter to know he never considered joining the military or decided not to because there was no shooting war going on.

I didn't have to know you for years to know you are, in fact, an obama apologist/supporter. To be an obama supporter one has to be also his apologist.

George said...

So you know...because you say so.

Gotcha.

guy faulkes said...

I would venture to guess Sark "knows" because logic and common sense are on his side of the debate.

Sarkazein said...

So you're thinking he didn't inhale?

Johnny Rico said...

Nonymouse said:
"But why is South African disarmament a liberal-v-conservative issue? Why are you so preoccupied with South Africa?"

Ah, ah ahhhh...a no, no! Don't try and redirect the question to another topic. I answered the question so how about you doing your part, liberal pov (notice lower case). Broken record syndrome in full effect.

WHY did South Africa suspend its nuclear weapons before apartied? I don't want to know that they did it as we already know they did it. I want to know the WHY. You seem incapable of answering this question except to bring race into the mix. LOL!!!

Balls in your court, idiot!!!

Your ole pal

Heidi Fallen

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

George,

Sark has sunk you my liberal socialist sheep of a fool. He's not one you want to argue with because he will make you look like a fool every time (which you are every time).

Good job Sark. The buffoon doesn't know when to quit!

J.R.

Johnny Rico said...

108 posts on this thread alone. Watauga Watch doesn't have that many on all its threads combined for an entire month. What a bunch of liberal socialist losers. LOL!!

Dwayne Peterson

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

We've covered a lot of ground on this thread. Let's see, we pounded liberals on the following:

1. Richard Petty and other old time drivers were ahead of their time. They were good ole boys which the liberals absolutley hate.

2. Illegal aliens committing crimes of intended violence against US schoolchildren with nary a peep from liberal politicians Len Hagaman or Cullie Tarleton

3. Metal detectors in courthouse. I though liberal sheep hated having their freedom taken away. They just took it away at the courthouse and the liberals are silent.

4. Secret Service victimizes women in Colombia and women's rights groups say nothing. Watauga Watch commentary says nothing.

5. GSA Scandal is not covered by Watauga Watch. LOL!!

6. Foreign aid and illegal aliens are absent from all political discussions

7. Ted Nugent rocks

8. Watched as liberals struggled and in the end failed to answer why South Africa gave up nukes prior to apartied. LOL - that always gets them.

9. Ann Coulter copied Johnny Rico musings on Negros with guns. Liberals remain very silent on this one as they have for 5 years now.

10. Moonshine is illegal for personal use in all states but marijuana is not.

11. Many more.

LOL!

Your ole pal

Edgar Owens

Johnny Rico

Reader said...

Anyone know where we can see a sample ballot? Not sure who I'm going to vote for yet.

Sarkazein said...

J.R & Guy Faulkes- That debate was a sign of the election to come. Obama defenders will contort themselves in every direction to mask things like the Middle East being in flames with worse taking over, high real unemployment, his choice of Energy Sec wanting gasoline prices to be around $10 a gallon, inflation in the food market and deflation in the housing market, as US Senator skipping two votes on student loans, his choice of a racist AG, his inability to lead or unite (pretty bad when you can't do either), his attacks on groups of Americans and certain industry.

NewGuy said...

Reader....the sample ballots can be found here:

http://www.wataugacounty.org/main/App_Pages/Dept/BOE/home.aspx

Reader said...

Thanks, New Guy.