This blog originally founded by Blogger who holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Liberals Never Vetted Obama, Left Job for Bloggers

FORBES MAGAZINE

20 comments:

Blogger said...

Sark wrote: "We have a no-load pot head for President. Thanks liberals. How about sitting the next one out." "If the MSM had vetted Obama, even you would have never voted for him."

Vetting is the problem. We find out Obama is really a European Socialist as we suspected.

Trump and Sheriff Arpio still believe by birth he is not eligible to run for president. They are still searching.

Many believe he is a closet muslim. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/poll-majority-of-mississippis-likely-gop-voters-believe-barack-obama-is-a-muslim/

20 years under Jeremiah Wright should have indoctrinated him into Black Liberation Theology.

In other words, if Libs won't vet him, others are, even while being labeled right wing kooks.

Sarkazein said...

Blogger- The liberals are so invested in Obama, it seems the more of his malpractice and more of his weird background being published make them support him more. He doesn't deserve their support. They are surrounding him like parents would a delinquent kid.

Sarkazein said...

No offense to delinquent kids intended. They have a chance to learn and change.

Sarkazein said...

Even your most warped Liberals are giving him cover by shouting racism. Sharpton and others say the term socialist is a derogatory racial term used by Conservatives. Name some white socialists conservatives like. They are saying all Blacks are socialists I guess and all socialists are Black. Socialism and worse, Black Liberation Theology, is a political philosophy. To protect their dim-witted President, as usual they squeal "racism" in an attempt to silence his critics. And none deny his sleazy life in the drug world. They only attack the messengers.

Happily Married said...

Sark,

Please explain his sleazy life in the drug world. The use of drugs in his early days does not disqualify him from anything. If disqualifications were handed out based on sleazy actions early in life, 90% would not qualify for President and none would be leaders with experience. I don't care if he did drugs in his youth, the man has turned out to be a success. This concept of a second chance is strong among conservatives who advocate for gun rights, why shouldn't a second chance be everyone's right (except the gays of course as they are second class citizens)

Jus' Sayin' said...

".....why shouldn't a second chance be everyone's right (except the gays of course as they are second class citizens)"

That simply isn't true Happy. Many many many gays are not citizens at all.

Sarkazein said...

Happily- You could not be more wrong. He certainly can qualify to win an election, but most jobs with a confidential clearance or law enforcement standards would disqualify him in a heartbeat. He couldn't get a job with a defense contractor working a fork-lift. They would not hire him based on his own words (self promoting auto biographies). He does not describe an occasional user's history. He describes (and others) a stoner's life. You assume he quit, I don't.
I believe all the stories one has to really dig for describing a sleazy nightlife, in Chicago, as an adult.
Have you watched the Larry Sinclair press conference for one?

Sarkazein said...

Happily- You s=use the same technique liberals used to defend Clinton.... "Oh, everybody lies about their sex life".

"If disqualifications were handed out based on sleazy actions early in life, 90% would not qualify for President and none would be leaders with experience."- Happily Married

That is just not true.

Sarkazein said...

Happily- It may be everyone's right to have a second+ chance. But being given a second chance does not qualify them for President.

Anonymous said...

He's a Socialist!
He's a Muslim!
He's a Kenyan!
He's Black Militant!

Those are some swanky tin-foil hats you got there.

Anonymous said...

Is Romney a unicorn?

"What about the persistent rumors that Mitt Romney is in fact, a unicorn? There has never been a conclusive DNA test proving that Mitt Romney is not a unicorn. We have never seen him without his hair -- hair that could be covering up a horn.

No, we cannot prove it. But we cannot prove that it is not the case. And if Mitt Romney is or may be a unicorn, he is not Constitutionally qualified to be president."

Sarkazein said...

A'mouse- Obama just awarded the highest civilian medal to a socialist.. a Hugo Chavez lover.

Romney never wrote a book about himself saying that he is a unicorn, but you are the perfect example of those who will defend Obama no matter what. It certainly must have taken a lot of thought on your part to come up with the unicorn comparison.

Anonymous said...

You seem a little sore that you can't prove that Romney isn't a unicorn.

Sarkazein said...

Obama fellow travler gets a medal

Anonymous said...

Wow, a 1min 40sec introduction. Groundbreaking. Still doesn't address the Romney-unicorn assertions.

Sarkazein said...

Tin-foil hat?

Anonymous said...

Yes Sark, you look very handsome in yours.

guy faulkes said...

Is it not interesting that if Obama had been convicted of what he has admitted, he would be a felon?

The left cannot explain this away, but then the rule of law only counts if they agree with it, so it does not matter to them.

Sarkazein said...

I read the Playboy article/interview with Jennifer Flowers pre election. There were plenty of rumors out about Clinton's lack of character, but that interview was actual evidence. In spite of the article, and because of the Perot volunteers, Clinton went on to win. Either a lack of character made no difference to the people who voted for him, or they didn't believe the article combined with other rumors. What did we get? Monica, Willy, Broderick, a lie conviction, and impeachment.
Obama gets a pass also. Is it from the people who character makes little difference, like Happy, or do people not believe it?

Sarkazein said...

My link to Obama's prize winning fellow traveler ran short.

THIS ONE is more complete