This blog originally founded by Blogger who holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Friday, December 18, 2015

We Are Screwed Again

SCREWED AGAIN

124 comments:

Wolf's Head said...

If you see Obama squirming around while seated it's because his ass is chafed from Paul Ryan's beard.

Blogger said...

This “Omnibus” tax-and-spend bill:

Leaves Obamacare fully intact while protecting labor unions
Fully funds Planned Parenthood
Fully funds Obama’s illegal executive orders on immigration
Funds sanctuary cities
Allows the continued flow of Syrian refugees
Keeps funding the largest government land-grab program
Fully funds Obama’s climate agenda, meaning higher energy costs for everyone
Fully funds cronyism and keeps subsidies, carve-outs and targeted tax breaks in place
Expands redistribution of income from makers to takers

USS Rodger Young said...

You bet you're screwed again. Why not thank one VIRGINIA FOXX who voted for the bill alongside Paul Ryan. She voted YES to the bill that kills babies in the womb and funds illegal aliens on the dole. For the 50th time, Virginia Foxx is a RINO. She barred sportswomen and men in Blowing Rock from testifying in front of Congress during the infamous Blowing Rock land trade back in 2006. She ASKED the Blowing Rock town manager to testify in front of Congress in Washington DC and didn't notify her constituents that there was even any testimony - These were HER constituents who were counting on her to represent them against a crooked Blowing Rock Town Council!!!!! Apparently that wasn't enough to wake up the RINOs who voted for her.

Perhaps now with the 1.1 trillion spending bill which is a sellout once again, we can finally put the Virginia Foxx myth of being a conservative to rest. Very few conservatives out there willing to take on a centralized, overarching government. Virginia Foxx isn't.

USS Rodger Young said...

Would anyone like to argue with the above paragraph? That's what I though.

USS Rodger Young said...

I elected the current crop of RINOs believing they got the Tea Party message of fighting for the proletariat, drastically scaling back government, increasing personal freedoms of Americans, deporting criminals (illegal aliens) and preventing the murder of unborn babies. They've done exactly the opposite. From the liberal NC State Legislature to the House and Senate, the RINOs are just like the Democrats. NO difference. A few on this site tried time and again to foretell what was happening (it was rather elementary to see it all coming), but the RINOs would have none of it. Now that they are funding baby killing, illegal aliens, the Patriot Act, and a large, centralized government, one would think they would get the message. But they don't. They're too stupid.

The simple fact Jeb "amnesty" Bush, Fat Boy Chris Christie, Marco "illegal alien lover" Rubio, and John "Puff Piece" Kasinich are supported at all is testament to that. Billary Clinton will be our next President. Too many liberals on the dole to stop it. But then again, there would be no difference between her and the aforementioned bunch of dolts if one of them were elected. You earned this folks. Enjoy.

USS Rodger Young said...

Hussein obummer told you what he was going to do when he took office. He has done ALL those things. He did it without regard to the opposition. He made a plan, stuck to it, and now we have things like obummercare, an nation of dependents, race wars, wars overseas, and forced multiculturalism (illegal aliens/5th column). He didn't take even one step back when the faux conservatives we now know as RINOs complained lightly. He boldly called out those who disagreed with him. He told oil companies he would "kick their ass" all the while refusing Dutch skimmer ships in hopes the Horizon "disaster" would be worse than it was. He talked down to the know nothing conservatives during public appearances. He does what he wants without regards to anyone's opinion other than that of his party. Gun control is coming.

Kind of reminds me of his counter-opposite: one Donald Trump.

USS Rodger Young said...

Hussein obummer is talking about executive order gun control after Christmas. I haven't heard a RINO say a peep. Nothing. The sellouts could care less if obummer takes your guns, and I'm starting to suspect they want gun control as much as obummer. The RINOs support a large, centralized government - an entity diametrically opposed to God, personal responsibility, freedom, liberty, guns, weapons, and rugged individualism (all of which made America). Therefore, RINOs secretly support gun control except in North Carolina where it's not a secret. The RINOs in the state legislature, especially Thom Tillis, Skip Stam, and Phil Berger, said gun rights "didn't poll well" as a reason not to pursue increasing rights of the proletariat. The Republican legislature in North Carolina is a mirror image of the century of Democrat rule. I cannot distinguish Republicans from Democrats in the State of North Carolina.

But then again, I told you so.

USS Rodger Young said...

And you dolts, especially New Guy, voted Thom Tillis into the Senate over a Tea Party Patriot. What a bunch of idiots.

Democratus Rex said...

I continue to be impressed that your WIFI reaches all the way out to the outhouse. What kind of router do you use?

USS Rodger Young said...

Democrapus Perplexed,

Speaking of outhouses in this fashion indicates you feel those who use outhouses are somehow inferior. If it's not race baiting you liberal sheep engage in, then it's class warfare. An outhouse is an acceptable manner of doing away with waste that many refer to as taking a Democrapus Perplexed! To think otherwise smacks of elitism. LOL!!! Which router do I use? - the one that bulldozes liberal extremists (you) into little dust piles.

Democratus Rex said...

I have an old Sears catalog if you need it.

Anonymous said...

Blogger could use it for your postings.

Sarkazein said...

USSRodgerYoung- Remember how people like DemocratusRex, after Hillary's husband exposed himself and asked for sex from an underling, called the accuser trailer trash who was attracted by a $100 bill dragged in front of her. It's inline with looking down their coke filled noses at people who might not have indoor plumbing.

Democratus Rex said...

You can also mail-order your first pair of shoes.

Democratus Rex said...

You made your choice. You bought guns instead of plumbing...and education.

USS Rodger Young said...

As is usual, the liberal socialist sheep resort to one line quips and emotion when beaten in an argument. Tell us Perplexed, does your Sears catalogue tell you why the highest rated show on National Geo Channel is no longer acceptable for the masses? What does your "education" tell you about government/corporate censorship? This ought to be interesting. LOL!!!

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

USS Rodger Young said...

Sark,

I do indeed remember the denigration of an intern by the very femi-Nazis who now push for "yes means no" on college campuses. Where were they when Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the world, was demanding sex from young women? Hypocrisy.

Wolf's Head said...

This is dated, but helps to demonstrate the depravity of the politicians, and why we are not supporting the republicrats anymore.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=661pi6K-8WQ

PS. Michael Moore is a fat, s**t filled haggis.

PPS. Vote Democrate! Elect old white people to the Presidency!

Sarkazein said...

As Michael Moore fights with his wife over who gets which mansions in their divorce.

Sarkazein said...

I read that Michael Moore is going to do a hit piece movie on TRUMP. If it works like Moore's movies did on gun proliferation, TRUMP will go up another 40 points in the polls.

Blogger said...


Breitbart reports Pelosi said “Ryan and his top aides “really gave away the store,” Democratic leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) declared Dec. 18 and that some media such as Politico omitted her statement in their report.

Sarkazein said...

The Republicans are fighting using the Marquess of Queensberry rules. The Democrats are Marxist street thugs fighting and using the Rules of Radicals.

Sarkazein said...

should read Rules For Radicals.

USS Rodger Young said...

Well said Sark. The Republicans are still trying to act like "gentlemen" in a world where such a term is a foreign as a Model A Ford. Sort of like the British fighting a gentlemen's war against American Patriots. Sadly, they won't ever learn.

Cyclops said...

I am a little late to the debate on this thread, but I am willing to challenge the conventional wisdom of some conservatives who post here. A Democrat landslide a la 1964 or even 2008 will be devastating to conservatives and to the country as a whole. It will negate conservative victories in 2010 and 14. Liberal Democrats will likely take the Senate and the Supreme Court will be controlled by the far left for the foreseeable future and probably forever,

There are just not enough American voters on the far right to win national elections. Obsession with ideological purity and vindictiveness toward those who fail to adhere to a rigid agenda will, if not effectively countered, result in the demise of any effective conservative opposition to collectivism and the welfare state. Some on the right may take a perverse satisfaction in opposing mainstream conservatives like Virginia Foxx, but their masochistic impulses seriously threaten the demise of conservative political and social values in America.

Candidates like Trump are a Pied Piper for conservatives. Follow him and he will lead us all over the cliff where only Hillary and her liberal Democrat allies will be there to bury our remains.

USS Rodger Young said...

"Effective conservative opposition" - Cyclops, we've not had that with Republicans winning a majority in the Senate and House just this last election cycle. They can't even stop a 1.2 trillion spending bill. RINOs, of which you refer to as our last hope, haven't been effective since before Reagan. George Bush gave us 40 million illegal aliens and vaporless spigots on gas cans. He also gave us LED light bulbs. How's that for effectiveness?

You go on to say: "masochistic impulses seriously threaten the demise of the conservative political and social values in America". Are you talking about the demise of RINOs? If so, good, because my masochistic impulses SUPPORT conservative political and social values in America, unlike RINOs like Virginia Foxx, Jeb Bush, Richard Burr and Fat Boy Chris Christie. RINOs are as liberal as the Democrats. Bush had both houses and the Presidency and frittered it all away. Just like the North Carolina State Legislature is doing right now. He did not increase my freedoms, liberty or reduce spending, or decrease the size of government. He did just the opposite, all under wraps. Immigration policies and gas spigots are an indicator of his proclivity towards a large centralized government. Same with the Patriot Act and NSA spying on Americans. The North Carolina Legislature recently sided with the North Carolina Sheriffs (politicians) in regards to pistol permits.

The fact you support liberals like Virginia Foxx or Marco "Amnesty" Rubio threatens values and conservatism in America much more than my Constitutional conservatism. Better to let it all come down so the reset button can be hit all the sooner.

Trump is not panacea for conservatives, but he happens to be one of the only conservatives in the race (Ted Cruz is the other). Bush wants amnesty. Rubio wants amnesty. Christie is a communist. Kucinich is a commie. And you support those bozos in the name of conservatism? You probably need a civics lesson on what a conservative really is. It's not that bunch of amnesty loving, big government loving, spending loving commie RINOs.

Like many true conservatives, I know what's on the line with this election. The same thing was on the line during the past two elections, and the sheeple of this nation crapped the bed. I've said long before that we're beyond the point of no return. If there was even a glimmer of hope to set things rights, it's not with RiNOs, it's with a hard core conservative willing to be as autocratic in his approach as Obummer is now. In other words, it would take doing things like decommissioning the IRS, EPA, DOE, etc and cutting off all foreign aid. Banning regulations against small business is another. RINOs won't do it. They were given the chance and we the people no longer trust them.

The fact you still don't get it speaks volumes. A Jeb Bush cannot win this election. If McCain and Romney couldn't, then what makes you think another liberal RINO will? Trump or Cruz are all you've got to hang your hat on Cyclops. No other choices. I keep hearing RINOs like you saying we should get behind whoever the Republican candidate is. Funny, I don't hear RINOs saying that about Trump or Cruz if they get the nomination. RINOs are liberals and I will campaign heavily against them. Better to have a known enemy standing in front of you instead of a friend (Paul Ryan anyone) stabbing you in the back.

USS Rodger Young said...

It's strange that I've explained the nuts and bolts of the above situation for several years now, and the RINOs are trying the same tactics that saw them lose, monumentally two times in a row!!! Doing the same thing several times and expecting a different outcome is what is known as the "pedantic approach."

USS Rodger Young said...

Cyclops, how did you feel when establishment Republicans turned their back on Tea Partier Ken Cuccinelli who was neck and neck with Mccauliffe in the 2013 Virginia governors race with NO support from the Republican Party? He lost by 56,000 votes. I didn't hear ANY RINOs espousing support for Cuccinelli. Cuccinnelli was a true conservative by the way. And you want me to support a RINO?

I'll not support a RINO candidate of any kind. Call it payback for the Ken Cuccinnelli fiasco. Oh, and McAuliffe is banning concealed carry holders from 25 states from exercising their 2nd Amendment Rights in Virginia effective January 1, 2016. I place the blame squarely on RINOs - the same RINOs who think I should vote for them. What a bunch of hypocrites.

Cyclops said...

RY: "Commies?" Really? Is that the best description you can come up with for conservatives who don't meet your idealogical litmus test? Your views would have been very much in vogue back in Joe MCCarthy's hey day.

And anyone else who doesn't subscribe to your distorted world view is either a RINO or a liberal. I've been on the political front lines supporting conservatives and conservative policies for too long to even dignify a denial.

And if you think things are bad now that the GOP controls Congress, try to comprehend just how much worse it would get if Democrats were to take total control .

Here's what a true conservative who wants our philosophy and policies to be successful believes:

It's better to get half a loaf than no loaf at all:

It's self-defeating to make "perfect" an adversary of "good".

It's masochistic to let liberals win just to punish those who could potentially be your allies.

I have been told that self destructive behavior satisfies a basic psychological need in some folks. I can only hope that this condition is limited to only a few on the political right and that it is not contagious to other conservatives.

Anonymous said...

Aren't Kucinich and McCauly both Democrats? Why lump them in with RINOs when they are not even Republicans? Doesn't "RINO" stand for "Republican in Name Only?"

Democratus Rex said...

Or, you could come to the realization that much of what you believe, is wrong.

Anonymous said...

"He did not increase my freedoms, liberty"

What specifically are you NOT now able to do that you WANT to do? Specifics, please. And also, identify how electing Hillary President over, say, Rubio, will fix that for you.

You can say that bringing on the end and hitting the reset button is the solution, but Europe has been headed down this road for over 100 years and they've not "reset." You'll be dead before things ever get better that way.

Anonymous said...

Oh, and did YOU vote for Cuccinnelli, Rodger Young?

USS Rodger Young said...

Cyclops said:
" Is that the best description you can come up with for conservatives who don't meet your idealogical litmus test?". Yes, it's a fitting monikor for RINO liberals who do not support the Constitution, limited government, freedom and liberty. If the shoe fits, wear it my friend.

" I've been on the political front lines supporting conservatives and conservative policies for too long to even dignify a denial." Really? Did you support Ken Cuccinnelli from the front lines? Strange, when I was bringing up the Cuccinnelli fiasco two years ago, not a peep from Cyclops. Strange how your suddenly claiming to be a conservative when you didn't support a true conservative. Your denial to answer me may stem from you being outed as a RINO. If the shoe fits, wear it.

"And if you think things are bad now that the GOP controls Congress, try to comprehend just how much worse it would get if Democrats were to take total control ." Ummm, let me see - they (Democrats) might pass a 1.2 million dollar spending bill? They might give us vaporless gas spigots on gas cans? They might give us the Patriot Act? They might give us the Blowing Rock Land Trade Fiasco (Burr and Foxx)? No, freedom is either there or it isn't. RINOs give us exactly the same as Democrats - less freedom, more debt, and a large, overbearing centralized government. Perhaps you should look at what's going on around you realizing it's as much the Republicans fault as the Dumocrats. Easy to see.

Here's a good one: "It's masochistic to let liberals win just to punish those who could potentially be your allies." Get off your high horse. You're a hypocrite. Again, look no further than the RINO abandonment of Tea Partier Ken Cuccinnelli to "teach the Tea Party a lesson." Turnabout is fair play. The potential "allies" you speak of ( RINOs), already set the punishment theme in motion. True conservatives have a long memory my friend, and I'll vote against a RINO for the next ten years to "punish" them for what they did to true conservative - Ken Cuccinnelli.

The topping on the cake: " I can only hope that this condition is limited to only a few on the political right and that it is not contagious to other conservatives."

The few patriots in 1776 who stood up to an overarching government fit into your insane stereotypical classification. Like a liberal, you seek to classify folks with whom you disagree into certain "groups." Won't work here my liberal friend. Freedom isn't free, and if you're willing to accept "half a loaf" of freedom, then your not free. Your acceptance of some oppression is oppression all the same. No difference. This is why Trump gets so much support - there are a few conservatives still left who don't fall for the siren call of "half a loaf." Wake up.

USS Rodger Young said...

Nonymouse coward said:

"What specifically are you NOT now able to do that you WANT to do? Specifics, please. And also, identify how electing Hillary President over, say, Rubio, will fix that for you."

You must really be stupid to ask a question like this. You're either a RINO or a liberal (no difference). If you have to ask how your not free, then there's probably no hope for you. Here is some low hanging fruit that your dull brain probably hasn't considered:

1. Vaporless gas spigots on gas cans. I want the old kind that don't spill gas.
2. Pistol permits in NC - I don't need govt. permission to exercise my 2nd amendment Rights
3. Building permits - I shouldn't have a tin god dictator of a building inspector up my ass when trying to build my home. Folks got along just fine for several centuries without communistic building codes. The free market will take care of substandard housing.
4. Zoning regulations - See above. Not the governments business what I do on my own land. That's communism. I like Soucheck and Jordan for attacking this form of communism. Good stuff. Right Blogger? LOL.
5. Environmental regulations. These regulations are a direct assault on freedom. If you can't dam up a pond on your property, then you're not free.
6. Hate crimes. These "crimes" are purported to lessen "hate", whatever that means. A crime is a crime - no need to call it something it isn't or to vilify someone based on skin color.
7. Regulations. The government won't let me open a greasy spoon diner/service station via an absolute torrent of rules/regulations. Rich corporations can afford the regulations they helped impose on ma and pa America greasy spoon diner/ service stations to put them out of business.
8. The Town of Boone won't let me graze a cow on my own land
9. I cannot sell Christmas Trees on my own land beside a highway in Blowing Rock because it's against town code

The list goes on an on. If you have to ask a dumb question like this, then may the chains of oppression rest lightly upon you.

You can say that bringing on the end and hitting the reset button is the solution, but Europe has been headed down this road for over 100 years and they've not "reset." You'll be dead before things ever get better that way.

I'd say Europe has been headed that way since WWII as have we. This isn't a recent phenomenon in America as you indicate. The income tax of 1913 started it, followed by the gun regulation act of 1934. We've been headed down this road for a long while, which is why we shouldn't rely on our collective conscious to define when we quit being free. The Patriots of 1776 rebelled over much less.

Lot of idiots out there who will ride this rocket ship right into the ground. Most will accept a small bit of freedom as a panacea. May the chains of oppression rest lightly.

USS Rodger Young said...

Nonymouse Coward - No I did not vote for Cuccinnelli as he was running for Virginia Governor and I'm a NC voter. I'll borrow a quote from one of your hero's as an answer - "What difference does it make?"

USS Rodger Young said...

any other liberals want to take a shot at the title?

Democratus Rex said...

You should consider moving to Somalia!

-No laws.
-No government/regulations.
-No hate crimes. Just, crimes.
-All the guns you can have.
-Plenty of beach front.
-Gas can be transported in anything that will hold it.
-No income tax.

It's a conservatives dream come true. It fulfills all of your requirements for a society? I wonder how you will argue against it? I wonder how long you would last?

USS Rodger Young said...

Democrapus Perplexed

Sounds like a liberal third world utopia to me. That's where we're headed under the leadership of Hussein obummer. You forgot the one thing that makes it a no go - the Somalis national sport is soccer which conservatives abhor for its boring demeanor and classless "athletes" if you can call them that. But obummer and the liberals want more soccer too. LOL!!!!!

On a bit more serious note - all the above you mentioned only apply to criminals. The citizens of Somalia are controlled by the government even more than here. As usual, the liberal utopia hurts citizens and helps criminals (San Bernardino anyone?)

Stings don't it.

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

Democratus Rex said...

Gun ownership only applies to criminals?

Cyclops said...

It would enhance the relevance and reputation of this blog if conservative posting here would disavow the self destructive approach to political action advocated here by aggressive extremists who try to intimidate those who express a different opinion.

If posters on the fringe of the conservative movement dominate the conversation here without negative feedback from movement conservatives, this site will become an irrelevant echo chamber for nihilists whose extreme radicalism is anathema to the most Americans. And these are the very folks that must be convinced to reject the collectivism that is the justification for the modern welfare state.

Democratus Rex said...

I anxiously await the conversation to come.

Sarkazein said...

Democrats have made a hard turn to radical leftism including Socialism and political correctness gone awry. Leftists try to stop debate with cries of "homophobe!" "xenophobe!" "racist!" "Fascist!". Yet, Cyclops calls out some Conservatives as extremists because they fight back. They don't write comments approved by Cyclops, so he calls them extremists.
Cyclops you wrote- "If posters on the fringe of the conservative movement dominate the conversation here without negative feedback from movement conservatives, this site will become an irrelevant echo chamber...."

I say it is not up to you to rule on what is "extreme" or "movement" because if your advice was followed the blog would then became an echo chamber.

Sarkazein said...

Should read- "... then would become an echo chamber.

Anonymous said...

Idiot Rodger Young,

You said Bush didn't increase your liberty, then when pressed to list things you want to do but cannot, proceeded to list mostly state/local issues. You are too stupid to even understand the difference between federal/state/local government!

And I knew Cuccinelli was a Virginia candidate that you couldn't vote for. I was wondering why you're bitching about it on a NC blog site.

Cyclops -- I'm with you. Conservatives had better stand together, and moronic rabid nutjobs like rodger young should remain on the fringe where they belong.

Sarkazein said...

Cyclops- For instance, DRex writes-"You should consider moving to Somalia!
-No laws.
-No government/regulations.
-No hate crimes. Just, crimes.
-All the guns you can have.
-Plenty of beach front.
-Gas can be transported in anything that will hold it.
-No income tax.
It's a conservatives dream come true. It fulfills all of your requirements for a society? I wonder how you will argue against it? I wonder how long you would last?"


DBrat is describing anarchy. Today's anarchists march hand and hand with the Democrats. The anarchists march side by side with Occupy Wall Street and Hands Up Don't Shoot. They are endorsed by the most radical leftist in our presidential history, Obama and former Speaker Pelosi. No Conservative commenting on this blog is more radical or extremist then what has now become the mainstream Left with Obama and Pelosi as their standard bearer.

Anonymous said...

And calling somebody anonymous coward is stupid -- your just as anonymous as me on this blog. If you want to call somebody a coward because they choose to click anonymous, put your own real name to your posts. Who are you? Stand behind all your bluster with your real name!

Anonymous said...

Sarkazein,
rodger young advocates for anarchy in some of his views. Drex seems to me to be an idiot, but so is rodger young, just from the other side. BOTH should be ignored as lunatics.

Anonymous said...

We are screwed again -- Hillary will be the next president because conservatives cannot work together. Nutjobs like rodger young will actively undermine conservative candidates if they have just ONE differing opinion. He pretty clearly said just that.

USS Rodger Young said...

Cycraps said:

" if conservative posting here would disavow the self destructive approach to political action advocated here by aggressive extremists who try to intimidate those who express a different opinion."

I agree fully with this statement. CONSERVATIVES posting here, like me, should continue to disavow the destructive behavior of establishment Republicans (liberals) who are indeed extremists in that they support increased spending, a large centralized government, Patriot Act, Amnesty, and government for the government by the government. RINOs are extremists, especially when they try and call themselves conservatives.

Then he says: "If posters on the fringe of the conservative movement dominate the conversation here without negative feedback from movement conservatives"

You need to restate that to say "If posters at the vanguard of the conservative movement dominate the conversation here without negative feedback from RINOS....."

Again, you are not a conservative. You are what is known as a RINO. There is little difference between your extremist views and those of liberal Democrats.

Finally he says: "extreme radicalism is anathema to the most Americans". And what "extreme radicalism" do you accuse me of? Give me just one example of this. Does standing up for the Constitution, lessening the grip of government on the proletariat, decreasing spending, increasing freedom and liberty at all levels constitute "extreme radicalism?" If it does, then GUILTY as charged. And proudly so. For instance, is The Blowing Rock Land Trade ok with you?

CyCraps, you remind me of Jeb Bush type RINOs who are in a high speed wobble over the fact your masquerade is over. Conservatives like me realize the damage that establishment Republican liberals have done over the past few decades. The 1.2 trillion spending bill brought to you by Paul Ryan is an example. I'll work against the establishment because they (you) are no different than what's in office now. Your sour grapes approach will only highlight the growing conservative movement. I love it when establishment thugs (you) are suddenly on the defensive from conservatives - your arguments are dangerously similar to those of one hussein obummer (notice lower case).

USS Rodger Young said...

And finally I'll bring the bulldozer over towards the Nonymouse Coward. You sound like CyCraps little brother - "Yeah, and hear me too!!" LOL!!!! CyCraps can at least put forth a minimal argument, but you ought to just quit right now. You sound, well, like his little brother or maybe his wife. LOL!!

Nonymouse Coward said: "rodger young advocates for anarchy in some of his views"

I do? And how did the little brother reach that epiphany? Give an example and I will address it, although like a typical liberal sheep, you'll be unable to. LOL!!!!

USS Rodger Young said...

Sark,

Good post as usual. You are a Patriot sir.

Cyclops said...

SARK: I agree with you in one important respect. Extremes on the right and on the left have something in common-- destructive impulses that would result in anarchy. And you're right, it's not up to me. I am just forecasting what happens when extremists take over anywhere or any thing. They inevitably lose much more support than they gain.

Anons 8:23, 8:39 and 8:41 have succinctly described the problem that I was trying to point out in a polite but too abstruse manner: "Nut jobs" and "idiots" undermine conservative candidates and hinder the conservative movement. Mainstream conservatives should call them out whenever they speak over-the-top or beyond-the-pale, but ignore their masochistic calls for retribution and political cleansing.

If the nut jobs manage to dominate this blog, it will degenerate into an incestuous colloquy among extremists to see who can post the most audacious and outlandish propositions and hurl the most vitriolic insults at those who call them out.

Anonymous said...

Is that the best you got? Pathetic moron. from what I've read the last few days, Cyclops sounds like a serious, reasoned person, someone who is a part of real conservative solutions, someone who actually does something useful and is involved in the political process. You sound like s street corner nutjob with a mental disorder. How have you participated in government? Ever volunteered for a campaign? Ever served as a delegate to a convention as Cyclops has? What have you ever actually done other than bitch on blogs?

Who are you? Put your name out there for us all to know who you really are. You talk real bold -- stand behind your tone. Give us your real name.

Sarkazein said...

Cyclops- Where we differ is in our view of what is "extreme", if you think comments by USSRogerYoung are "extremist" in the same vain as Leftists in their hardcore turn to Socialism, PC (thought police), their perverted view of the First Amendment (freedom from religion with an anti-Christian bias), then we disagree.
In this thread, I commented about people on the Right are fighting using gentleman's rules and people on the Left are using Rules For Radials. It ain't working too good, right?
Typically Conservatives think strongly enough in their views that what someone else writes isn't going to make us run to Hillary's teat/big government's teat.

Look at Anonymous's last comment- "Is that the best you got? Pathetic moron." Is that "extremist"? It's not going to change my political character.

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous's last comment 5:04 PM reminds me of a HappilyMarried comment. He would complain about Conservatives being too aggressive, then cuss and call names and express a wish for his distractors to die an early death so he would feel better about his own beliefs. In fact, Anonymous 5:04 PM just might be HM.

Sarkazein said...

Cyclops- I would be interested in what Conservative views you believe are extreme.

Democratus Rex said...

This thread should be titled, "When conservatives eat their young".

Anonymous said...

Sarkazein,
I don't know this hm you reference. As a conservative, the one thing that irritates me the most is this red-meat attitude that rodger young and others like him display. I don't like Trump, but I understand his success -- toss out a lot of red meat to the dogs who don't think. Then, when he's elected he'll realize he can't build a wall unless congress authorizes the money. He's running on a lot promises as if the president is a four year tyrant. Maybe after 8 years of Obmama, everyone thinks that way. Problem is, it's not actually that way and a lot of people are going to get duped like they did the last 2 elections. conservatives need to show they aren't red meat savages, but thoughtful adults capable of governing. Do YOU think rodger young demonstrates maturity, or thoughtfulness, or rationality? If I'm too insulting to rodger young, it's because he seems to be awfully insulting and I haven't seen you call him on HIS insults at all.

And as for liberals using rules for radicals, and conservatives needing to do the same, fine. I'm not saying conservatives should roll over, but they shouldn't come across as wild-eyed crazies, either. Tell your friend rodger to spend less time attacking conservatives and more time attacking liberals. He seems to helping liberals quite a bit with his attacks on conservatives.

Who did you support in 2012, romney or obama? I'll bet rodger spent more time attacking romney that obama if his attitude then was the same as it is now.

Cyclops said...

Sarkazein said...
"Cyclops- I would be interested in what Conservative views you believe are extreme."

I am glad you asked. Here's just a short list from this thread. Didn't go back to past harangues.

NSA is spying on Americans.

Virginia Eoxx and Marco Rubio are "liberals" and "RINOS."

Chis Christie is a "communist."

The GOP-controlled NCGA is "liberal."

One can't determine Republicans from Democrats in the NCGA. (I guess one would have to be politically astute).

Labeling any conservative who doesn't subscribe to extreme views a "RINO." (Even Phil Berger. Really?)

Won't vote for the GOP establishment types for 10 years for what they did to Ken Cuccinelli. (I assume he means he won't support GOP candidates in NC even though Cuccinelli was a candidate in Virginia. That's an example of what I consider masochistic retribution.)

Thinks the litmus for a conservative is posting support for Ken Cuccinelli's candidacy on this blog.

Any conservative who voted for Thom Tillis is a "dolt."

"Its not the government's business what I do on my own land."

No need for environmental regulations. (Of any type?)

No health and safety regulations for small businesses. (The consuming public will love that).

Sark, it's not conservatives I am concerned about. It's the literally millions of moderate Republicans and conservative leaning Independents who will either stay home or "run to Hillary's big government teat." Resorting to name calling and personal insults and adopting the attitude and the political extremism of far right, self indulgent nihilists is a sure fire way to send the modern conservative movement into oblivion.

Anonymous said...

Hey rodger young, is sarkazein YOUR little brother? He sounds like your little brother as much as I sound like Cyclop's little brother.

Anonymous said...

Sark, where have you complained about rodger's "cuss and call names" comments when directed at RINOS and "dolts?" Do you ever? Seems like a lot of "bro love" between you two ("Sark, Good post as usual. You are a Patriot sir.")

Sarkazein said...

AKA Anonymous 8:05PM - I didn't "complain" about HM's/your comments either. I just commented on them, an observation in fact. To me, it was amusing to read a comment declaring victimhood caused by others comments and in the same comment doing the same or more of what he was complaining about. I don't remember any cussing from USSRodgerYoung, perhaps you could cut and paste to remind me. I cuss myself as we watch our country going through "fundamental change" for the worse.
AND, unless you are making some kind of homosexual slur (also similar to HM's writing style), I have love for all my Conservative brothers and sisters. Only a Liberal would demean the compliment of being called a "patriot".

USS Rodger Young said...

I can see the liberals are in a high speed wobble!!!! Nonymouse coward and Cycraps have went full native on us!!!!!!!!! They were unable to deny their liberal tendencies. The usual emotion, name calling, and saying the same thing over and over are the order of the day. Nonymouse, I assume the "little brother" comment really set you off judging from the hate filled vitriol you spewed above. LOL!!! It doesn't take long for USS R.Y. to out a liberal, and you two were "Rodgerized" immediately.

As far as trying to use my little brother remark towards Sark, I think it's obvious Sark has an intellect far beyond anyone on this thread. But imitation is the best form of flattery I guess. Perhaps nonymouse coward should post his regular avatar before calling others out!! LOL!!!

Cycraps did his utter best to fit a square peg into a round hole when answering why he thinks I'm an extremest. The fact is, Cycraps is an extremist (nonymouse, I don't count you because you're a parrot) due to the aforementioned reasons. Lets take a look at his list:

1. NSA is spying on Americans. Yes, this is true. They also spied on journalists. The view that NSA spying on Americans being bad is what separates Patriots from lemmings. If you think NSA spying on Americans is a good thing CyCraps, then it is YOU who is an extremist.

2. Virginia Eoxx and Marco Rubio are "liberals" and "RINOS." I've been over it time and again (see above) how both are liberal RINOs. Foxx just voted for obummer's 1.2 trillion spending bill that was pushed by fellow rino liberal Paul Ryan. She also blocked local sportswomen and men from testifying in front of Congress regarding the infamous Blowing Rock Land Trade. Instead, she secretly communicated with the crooked Blowing Rock Town Council to have the town manager testify. Govt. for the govt. by the govt. Rubio wants amnesty for criminals (illegal aliens) therefore he is a liberal RINO. If you support these two morons, then that makes you, Cyclops, an extremist. That was easy.

3. Chis Christie is a "communist. True. Facts speak for themselves. He consistently supports a large, centralized government, deficit spending, and rules and regulations that help put ma and pa America out of business (see my comments on the greasy spoon diner/gas station above). Nothing extremist here, just an observation that you somehow (we don't know why) disagree with.

4. The GOP-controlled NCGA is "liberal." Been over this time and again. They will not hear gun bills because gun bills don't "poll well" according to liberals Thom Tillis and Phil Berger and Skip Stam. I have not had my freedoms or liberty increased at all under Republicans. I see NO difference between the RINO state legislature now and 20 years ago (Democrat). Nothing extremist here, just the flat out truth. Even Blogger understands the mistake it was to put Tillis in Congress.

5. Ken Cuccinnelli. The fact the national establishment RINOs refused to support Ken Cuccinnelli at the state level is enough for me to recognize the extremist mindset of establishment RINOs. Think globally, act locally. It doesn't matter that this gal votes in NC or any other state - the fact that Tea Partier Ken Cuccinnelli was targeted by establishment Republicans is enough for me to do the same thing to establishment Republicans. If you think this is extremist, then you may need psychological help.

Establishment thugs like Cycraps and nonymouse coward little bro. are threatened by conservatives like myself and Sark. Perhaps you two trolls should join Watauga Watch as you have more in common with those extremists than you do here.

USS Rodger Young said...

Sark, I have never cursed at anyone on this blog. Never. Not once. More revisionist history by two liberals who've been outed. I find it funny and a touch sad that they dipping this low. I believe the establishment is in a near panic as we see above that conservatives are waking up. Folks, an establishment candidate WILL NOT be able to win the Presidency as we've seen twice with RINOs McCain and Romney. I find it hypocritical that you two are unable to support a conservative like Ted Cruz or Ken Cuccinnelli.

If you two were able to see beyond your filthy selves, you would know that I've disagreed with Sark and other conservatives on this site. In fact, Sark has often made some pretty strong arguments on why I should've supported Romney during the last election. The difference between him and you two radical extremists, is Sark makes a point that's usually right and always intricately difficult to argue with. What I'm getting at is I respect Sark. He's the kind of dude I'd probably like to drink a beer with as he "gets it." I don't agree with him or the other true conservatives on everything, but we agree on a lot.

I warn you two dolts not to challenge Sark to a philosophical point/counterpoint. He'll eat you two up and spit you out. LOL!!

This ought to be interesting........

Cyclops said...

RY, You posts are redundant. My last post was in response to Sark's request for what "conservative views" I think are "extreme." We've all seen enough of you're belligerent and bizarre opinions. I am waiting to see if Sark or others who comment here share any or all of the views I listed as extreme. And if they also subscribes to the personal insults (such as "thug" and "Cycraps") that you employ when addressing those of us those who don't share your radical outlook.

Democratus Rex said...

You do an excellent job of illustrating and selling the conservative ideology.

Anonymous said...

Sarkazein,
Maybe rodger doesn't "cuss" (it was a copy and paste of YOUR comment) but he absolutely insults and you've NEVER "commented" on his style the way you jumped on mine immediately, "little brother." As Cyclops mentioned above, "Cycraps," "little brother" (if that one got to you, that's why I did it -- just applying his style to him and his "little brother"), RINO, dolt, and, "You must really be stupid." Then, and this is REALLY funny, rodger coplains, "The usual emotion, name calling" about ME!!! Remove the plank from your own eye, brother, before trying to remove the splinter from my own.

I'll support Cruz if he is the nominee. Will YOU support Rubio if HE is the nominee? Who is the deranged nutjob? Who will act like a big baby and refuse to vote if they don't get their way all the way? Who will help Hillary get elected just to cause some kind of downfall? Who will keep working to try to save this country from liberals?

Who are you rodger young? You keep talking big, but I think your just a small minded, uninvolved person who doesn't do anything away from his keyboard but whine and insult others. What have you done in the real world? Work for a campaign? Volunteer with a party? Give money to a campaign? Serve as an elected official -- that'd be funny! What? Who are you? Looks to me like your the one in "full wobble!"

Sarkazein said...

Cyclops- CLICK HERE

USS Rodger Young said...

Cycraps,

I asked you what views you thought were extremist as well as your thoughts on the infamous Blowing Rock Land Trade. You declined to answer me by trying to offline it onto Sark. I answered your ill conceived notions of what constitutes extremism, and now you don't know which way to turn. When we talk about radical outlooks, the fact you won't engage on the Ken Cuccinnelli fiasco in which establishment Republicans turned their back on a Tea Partier to teach conservatives a lesson, speaks volumes about true radicalism. Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush support amnesty for 40 million criminals (illegal aliens) living in our once great country. You support them - whose the radical here? If you're not tuned into the anger of the conservative movement in this country it means one of two things - either you haven't become enlightened yet, or you're a liberal. I'd say the latter.

The radicalism surrounding liberal thought is breathtaking. Take John McCain. McCain, a known liberal, supports background checks to purchase guns, was open to an assault weapons ban at one time, supports amnesty for criminals (illegal aliens), destroyed the sport of boxing by limiting matches to 12 instead of 15 rounds, and called ultimate fighting "human cockfighting." I'm unsure what business it is of John McCain if I decide to watch a couple people beat their brains out, but I do know it takes a radical to vocalize these concepts. And you support folks like this!!!! Cyclops, YOU are a radical. Additionally you sound much like Liberal POV with your inability to answer simple questions. Being a conservative is black and white. No almost, maybe, sort of, perhaps, or sometimes. If you don't espouse a conservative view then you're a liberal. You might be more comfortable over on Watauga Watch. It seems you have more in common with them at this point.

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

Sarkazein said...

Cyclops- It does appear we just differ on extremism and whether it is good or bad. I see USSRodgerYoung's comments as a stronger support for liberty than most and not what you are describing as "extremism". Extremism would be the liberal on this thread writing that a call to end over-regulation a bad thing. It is extreme to accept an over-zealous over regulating government.

USS Rodger Young said...

And for information, had either one of you paid attention, Sark and I do sometimes disagree on various points. The reason the disagreement doesn't evolve into what happens with you two feeble minded amateurs, is because Sark's points are nearly unassailable. He makes points and backs them up with an intellectual wit that few on this site possess. Most of the time when we disagree, I go away thinking about the things Sark says.

You two though, espouse the same tired talking points that brought the country to where it is right now. Your poli-speak as I call it, gives us inoperable gas-can spigots and 12 round boxing matches. Sark, on the other hand, "gets it" in that he may not like human cockfighting or 15 round boxing matches (example only), but he is able to articulate scenarios in which a 15 round boxing match is functional. You two have no wiggle room. You're extremists who are helping to tear this country apart. Voting for the lesser of two evils is no longer an option as evil is evil.

USS Rodger Young said...

Little bro, or brau as the kids say it nowadays, I see you are still caught up in the cursing thing. I have never cursed. I do not call you two dolts names either. My monikers are a statement of fact, not name calling. If I endow someone with the descriptor "liberal socialist sheep" for example, the statement of fact is readily apparent. Liberal describes a belief, socialist describes political inclinations, and sheep is representative of someone unable to think for themselves (devoid of personal responsibility.) So, little brau, don't fret that I've given your big brau a shellacking. It's happened on this site for years, and I've actually grown weary of putting liberal sheep in their place. I don't curse, don't disrespect the respectful, or resort to emotion. I answer all posts and throw out hard questions with the frequency of illegal aliens taking jobs from Americans. Little brau.........

USS Rodger Young said...

Cyclops and Little brau - seriously now. The one thing about conservatives is we are a pretty forgiving bunch. Come over to our side and help us fight the good fight. You are welcome on this blog and in the company of Patriots and God Fearing women and men. Join with us in our march to restoring conservative values in America. This is an invitation that is open all of the time. You may not decide to accept just now or even in a few months, but my guess is things will become so untenable that you both will join the conservative band of brother and sisters this country needs so badly.

Sarkazein said...

USSRoderYoung- Thank you for all of the kind words. Your comments promote thought for all as you can see by the responses on this thread. You are the blog's drill sergeant.

Anonymous said...

Boxing matches!?! Ultimate fighting?!? This is where you turn to? What a joke! You truly are pathetic. And you need to learn to read -- I acknowledged that maybe you never cursed. You accuse Cyclops of ignoring your points, but you did the same thing. i pressed you to list where bush failed to "increase your liberty" and you listed a bunch of things that were state and local. When I called you on it, you ignored your obvious gaffe and just went into attack mode.

Here's a tip for you. You will never matter. Gas can spiggots and boxing and ultimate fighting? Keep ranting and let the adults make the serious decisions. Why on earth anyone on this blog gives you any credibility here is beyond me. I'm fairly new here, so i have no idea where you and sark have ever agreed, but he sure seems to just be YOUR little brother, attacking anyone who dares criticize you, never saying a word about your tactics but jumping on anyone who mimics them in attacking you, "thanking you" for your kind words. sarkazein - rodger doesn't promote thought -- he promotes irrationality, flitting from one complaint to the next -- illegal aliens to boxing to gas can spigots. And you think he promotes thought?!? Ha! What morons!

Cyclops said...

Sark: I respect your opinion while strongly disagreeing with you on what's politically extreme. At least you disagree in a respectful manner without the name calling and insults. But I am somewhat surprised that you think calling a patriotic American like Chris Christie a "commie," or agreeing that governmental health, safety and environmental regulations are unnecessary, or that hurling personal insults at those who support a different approach is not "extreme" or at least counterproductive to promoting a conservatives agenda.

Anon 7:53 is on target: RY's ranting does not promote rational thinking or an intellectually stimulating debate. It just turns most folks off. Look up the definition of "nihilism." It fits RY's approach to a tee.

So I will to continue to vote and advocate for NC CONSERVATIVES like Virginia Foxx, Richard Burr, Phil Berger et al, as I expect most other clear thinking conservatives to do. They may not be perfect, but as I said earlier, "perfect" should not be a adversary of "good" or make something much worse possible.

No doubt there is a libertarian fringe out there that can muster one or two percent of the vote in any election. Usually that doesn't much matter, but it could help liberals defeat conservatives in close elections. That is the real threat from libertarian extremism.

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous 7:53 AM- You just don't understand the thoughts of a free man/woman. When talking about government regulation and now the litigious society liberalism has brought us, those things demonstrate the overall problem we face. This is all part of the incrementalism of the Left.... how long before you start writing about something being taken from your life by either government or an increasingly effeminate society. It may be too late, if not already.

USS Rodger Young said...

Nonymouse Coward said:

"Boxing matches!?! Ultimate fighting?!? This is where you turn to? What a joke!" I see your still a bit peeved. LOL!! Yes, boxing and ultimate fighting are fine examples of government sponsored extremism. If they can attack boxing or ultimate fighting, then why not guns, 1st amendment rights and a host of other things. We call this a "litmus test" meaning how they stand on certain issues is indicative of how they will vote on all others. The fact a politician saw fit to limit boxing to 12 rounds should scare the heck out of anyone. But you don't seem concerned which meshes nicely with your liberal attitude. "Don't look at that man behind the curtain.!! This is exactly the point that conservatives are mad about - we don't need liberal extremists like you and Cycraps telling us what is important and what is not. As a supposed newbie to this site, you won't last long with your God complex. There is only one God, and it isn't you.

I see little brau and cyclips haven't answered the Blowing Rock Land Trade question that was asked several times. Like liberal socialist sheep, you don't want to touch hot button topics, especially when those topics out RINOs like Virginia Foxx and Richard Burr. Both those RINOs chose government over the proletariat. And you two dolts support government by the government for the government? Good little Marxists you are.

Stings don't it

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

Funny how Liberal POV, Democrapus Perplexed, PLOP! and the rest of the liberal socialist sheep aren't posting on this thread - they're already here - Little Brau and Cyclips.

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous 7:53 AM- Does it NOT aggravate you watching the Republican controlled Congress give away the store to Obama and Pelosi? Do you think this would be happening if 100's of USSRodgerYoungs made up the legislature? Your feelings might be hurt, but you would be a free man/woman.

USS Rodger Young said...

Cyclips,

I seem to remember running you off this site a few years back. The issues were similar back then - you supported liberalism and thought everyone else should have too. When I called you out on your liberal views, you quit and actually said you'd never be back. Unfortunately, you lied and are back. Here's another question that you probably won't answer. Did you happen to know New Guy? When New Guy was banning my posts during the Thom Tillis campaign it reminded me of the Cyclops mentality (liberalism). I bet you two socialists were buddies and probably plants by the Watauga County establishment Republicans. I'm right aren't I. You two suddenly appeared as election time neared spouting the usual establishment garbage that has this nation in the state it's in. It's especially interesting to note you two say many of my examples were state and local issues. Although most of them aren't the fact that I think globally and act locally is important. A gas can spigot given to us by liberal George Bush is a national issue that affects my life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness guaranteed by the Constitution. You two dolts must support GOVERNMENT MANDATED GAS CAN SPIGOTS. What other oppressive measures to you support?

When establishment RINO extremists like you and little brau continue to do the same things expecting a different result it highlights the ineffectiveness of establishment RINOs. Quit masquerading as conservatives when you are full fledged, card carrying LIBERAL SHEEP. And yes, fat Boy Chris Christie is a communist as are many other RINOs. His ineffectual leadership in New Jersey in which he chose a large, centralized government over the proletariat assures us that he is dangerous to liberty. I can't think of one issue I agree with Christie on. He stays far away from talking about gun rights, deporting illegal aliens, and decreasing the size and scope of government (IRS, EPA, DOE, etc). How anyone would support Christie, who is NO different that Billiary is beyond me.

Well, I've answered all questions offered, and rather than engage with USS Rodger Young, the village idiots are beside themselves. One would think they would know better after years of me correcting liberals, but then again doing the same thing time and again expecting a different result bespeaks of ignorance. Good day.

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

Brooke

USS Rodger Young said...

Sark,

Sometimes a drill sergeant is needed to keep the mutts in line. If not, the incessant barking and dry humping distracts from pertinent, clear thought.

Cyclops said...

RY, your memory seems to be as faulty as your logic. I never said I would never be back on this blog. At times when the conversation here is irrelevant or goes off the deep end, I have concentrated on other sites, debating liberals who dominate many political blogs. This is what rational conservatives should focus on rather than criticizing and trying to divide conservatives.

Since your views are so irrelevant and out of the mainstream of effective conservative politics, I will not bother to debate specifics with you. I will, however, correct the record when you misstate my views or misquote my posts.

Cyclops said...

Sark: You're totally ignoring the point we are trying to make. In contemporary America, there will NEVER be 100s of RYs in any legislature. So why ride a tired horse to death?

My major interest is in promoting a conservative agenda by electing conservatives who will make a difference in promoting conservatism and opposing liberal politicians. It has been demonstrated over and over that the far right libertarians cannot win general elections or even Republican primaries in NC. At most, all they can potentially do is make it possible for liberal candidates to win and for liberals policies to be enacted.

Sarkazein said...

Cyclops- I would normally agree with you. BUT, today's reality is a Congress with a majority in both Houses who are exactly as you describe (with few exceptions) and we are losing ground at a faster rate than the French did in WW2.

Hieronymus Anonymous said...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-donald-trump-is-destroying-the-republican-party/2015/12/28/747668f6-ad9e-11e5-9ab0-884d1cc4b33e_story.html

Anonymous said...

Poor rodger young, spinning faster than a kid's top! Now its some Blowing Rock land trade deal? Please point to where you posed that question to me? Ha! And did you or did you not lay blame at bush's feet for mostly state and local issues. Talk about avoiding something! Your a dolt not worthy of anyone's valuable time.

Who are you? What do you do away from your computer that has any effect whatsoever? Why don't you answer THOSE questions, dolt? Just a fringe nutjob, like I've been saying all along, and your too stupid to even realize it. I'll guarantee your not involved in politics in anyway whatsoever -- just an internet blowhard, with a one man cheering squad. Ha!

Democratus Rex said...

For now, you don't need my input. You are doing fine all by yourself.

Blogger said...

All who are interacting with JR. You might be interested to know she is a she. And, unlike Hillary, she did not play the gender card on you. LOL

USS Rodger Young said...

CyCraps,

I see you continue to make the amateur mistake of classifying various types of conservatives. There are no shades of conservatism; you either are or you're not. A conservative today promotes Constitutional Constructionism, a limited form of government, increased liberty and freedom for the common man. You stand in opposition to all of these conservative principles. No, your not a rational, moderate, or part time conservative because there isn't such a thing. You are a liberal sheep. Little brau is too. Calling yourselves conservatives is a ploy of the liberal left to water down the conservative movement. RINOs are part of the liberal left, let's not forget that inconvenient fact.

At the beginning of this thread, you both started out as moderate RINOs. Now look at yourselves. Several dozen posts later, and your screaming, yelling extremists out for the personal names of posters!!!! Difficult to differentiate you dolts from the liberal posters over on Watauga Watch. You both are very, very angry right now - the vitriol is palpable. If you were speaking what you wrote, you'd be yelling. If the rest of us were speaking what we were writing, a calm, measured conversation would ensue. Sort of like an amateur boxer taking on a prizefighter (in under 15 rounds as McCain wouldn't let that happen). The amateur swings away whilst the prizefighter capitalizes on numerous openings presented.

Something as simple as a vapor-less gas can spigot is enough to differentiate a liberal from a conservative. No conservative in existence would, when he/she had control of the Presidency and Congress, voluntarily mandate the proletariat's ability to procure gas can spigots of their choice.

Thanks Blogger, for pointing out my gender. I don't usually pronounce my womanhood as liberals are exceedingly threatened by strong, conservative women. I absolutely love Pamela Geller, Michelle Malkin, and Ann Coulter. They are hated by the left for what they say and stand for - individual responsibility. Blogger and Sark are Patriots. We don't agree on everything, but I come away thinking heavily when both speak. They have merit in what they say. The two village idiots, CyCrapus and Little Brau have no merit in what they say as they change constantly to suit the current political environment. Patriots on this site seek to CHANGE the political environment, not conform to it.

USS Rodger Young said...

Democrapus Perplexed,

No one has every needed your input. You sound like a broken record with no new material. Please stay away or please post - no one has ever valued your faulty opinion. ever. LOL!!!

Stings don't it

PS Democrapus, have you EVER generated 90 comments on a thread? Ever? LOL!!!! Irrelevancy must suck.

Nobody said...

Blogger said, "All who are interacting with JR. You might be interested to know she is a she."

USSRY said, "Thanks Blogger, for pointing out my gender."

So USS Rodger Young now admits she is also Johnny Rico? Didn't I make that accusation about a year ago and she denied it? Yeah, I think we had a little bit of back and forth over that. Funny!

Democratus Rex said...

Get back in the kitchen and make a sandwich, then knit me a sweater.

USS Rodger Young said...

Liberal sheep,

The reason you can't gain traction in disparaging USS Rodger Young stems from the hand to mouth nature of liberals. Instead of thinking in terms of the long game, you try and defeat a master in one thread. Ain't going to happen. It won't happen in the long game either, but you might last a little longer. What started out as an effort to derail USS Rodger Young ends with liberals yelling for sandwiches and sweaters. Kind of extreme isn't it? LOL!! Spinning liberals into a tizzy has long been a forte of several conservatives on this site. Good day.

Cyclops said...

RY, What egotistical nonsense. Your views are irrelevant to contemporary politics. You can boost and bluster all you want on this site, but few if any take you seriously. Self delusion may make you feel relevant, but it's not enough to have a positive impact on others' thinking.

Cyclops said...

I thought science had proven Neanderthals were extinct. But it seems we have on this blog a thawed relic from the Ice Age. I never thought I'd concede this point, but the UN and Obama et al could be right about global warming. How else can this phenomenon be explained?

Sarkazein said...

Cyclops- "Neanderthal" is a derogatory slur used by Liberals against Conservatives. Your "contemporary politics" might be sneaking up on you and your quip about "global warming" might be a parapraxis.

Anonymous said...

Sarcasm. Why attack cyclops while giving rodger a pass? cheerleader.

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous 11:38 AM- If you think that was an "attack"... well, I doubt Cyclops is ready to declare victimhood over that one.

Anonymous said...

The fact is, trolls like RY have succeeded in dragging down this blog! Serious discussion is no longer possible here with all the hate posts, insults, and name calling replacing intelligent dialog.



Sarkazein said...

Anonymous 11:50 AM- How is it you let one person rule over you? How can one person's comments prevent your comments from being "serious". How does one person's comments replace intelligent dialog by you? Individualism is a Conservative trait, perhaps the most important one. By individualism I don't mean a pierced tongue, a man bun, Gerber Baby hair style, a backwards hat, pants not covering the butt, a tattoo across your forehead or a T-shirt with a cuss word on it.

Sarkazein said...

Anonymous 11:50 AM- How is it you let one person rule over you? How can one person's comments prevent your comments from being "serious". How does one person's comments replace intelligent dialog by you? Individualism is a Conservative trait, perhaps the most important one. By individualism I don't mean a pierced tongue, a man bun, Gerber Baby hair style, a backwards hat, pants not covering the butt, a tattoo across your forehead or a T-shirt with a cuss word on it.

Anonymous said...

Individualism = Selfishness.

Cyclops said...

Sorry Sark, if you took offense at my attempt at satire. But I am dismayed that you and RY want to claim or imply I am a liberal or RINO every time I post, even when I am being sarcastic. There is nobody who more convinced that Climate Change is a liberal hoax than me. We should discuss it sometime on another thread.

Anonymous said...

"There is nobody who more convinced that Climate Change is a liberal hoax than me. "
Then, you sir, are a fool.

Sarkazein said...

Cyclops- No offense taken. Mine was only an observation.

Cyclops said...

Anon 3:27:

Only time will tell and I doubt either of us will be around long enough to find out for scertain. I plan to leave my prediction in a Time Capsule to by opened by my heirs in 2100. But if you and the other alarmists are right, I may have no living heirs in 2100.

USS Rodger Young said...

This is classic. After 100 posts we have nonymouse coward attacking his ally Cyclips!!!!! They were buddies for 100 posts and then WHAMO!!!! Nonymouse coward is a believer in man-made global warming despite the scientists who dreamed up the lie being caught writing fake studies. Yet nonymouse is coming after Cyclops, his buddy, over junk science!!!! Doesn't get any better than this. Who are the extremists here? LOL!!!!!!

USS Rodger Young said...

RINO Richard Burr and Virginia "For the Government" Foxx are both establishment duds who have sold you out time and again. Foxx voted for Paul Ryan's 1.2 trillion spending bill along with liberal Democrats. The bill goes on to the Senate where RINO Burr will vote for it also. NO difference between RINOs and Democrats. Only a few conservatives running for President and in Congress can save this once great country. Ted Cruz would do a good job of dismantling the mess we have on our hands now, and I'm hoping he'll win in Iowa. Trump's too vulnerable but would do a good job in destroying both political parties. Chris Christie is a commie yankee who couldn't lead a coyote to a carcass. Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio are too busy trying to give our country away to criminals (illegal aliens) via amnesty. Those who support socialists, are socialists.

Anonymous said...

Two different people now posting as anonymous -- i didn't write the last several anonymous posts. too stupid to know the difference? obviously!

Anonymous said...

On a blog on new year's eve at 10:25? what, no friends?

USS Rodger Young said...

Now we have nonymouse coward trying to deny he is opposing Cyclips. It doesn't get any better than this. Gotta love the insidiousness of a liberal sheep!!! Or perhaps this is why one doesn't post as an anonymous coward. LOL!!!

Anonymous said...

I don't give a rat's turd what you think, idiot! My last post was yesterday at 11:38 am. Someone else posted as anonymous. If you can't tell the difference, your dumber than I thought. and I didn't think you could be any dumber.

so were most of those issues you mentioned state and local issues? why don't you admit when your WRONG? Ha, just a moronic nutjob.

you call me a coward for using anonymous, but tell me how picking a name like rodger young isn't just another way of remaining anonymous? tell us who you are if your not a COWARD! That's what I thought! Big talk, no guts. this blog is probably the ONLY place you can think of yourself as the big man. or woman or whatever you are. Yeah, a woman who wants to be a man!

Democratus Rex said...

You forgot, "LOL!! I WON!!"

Cyclops said...

Anon 11;11. I suspected as much. There are a number of Anonymous posters here, but RY seems oblivious to that and resorts to childish antics to gain attention. There is no longer any substance to his or her posts.

USS Rodger Young said...

Seems childish to post as Anonymous when there are many other nonymouse cowards now doesn't it? LOL!! Perhaps now you understand why USS Rodger Young doesn't post as anonymous. The liberal left had been reduced to screaming maniacs so mad at the world they could eat their own faces. These 116 posts have shown us a lot - the "reasonable" mantra you dolts professed a few days back is out the window. It's been replaced with rabid mania towards all who disagree. I rest my easy won case. Class is over for today - Cyclips and Little Brau - it will be a long year for you two!!!!!!!

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

Brooke Lesman

Stings don't it

Reader said...

Blogger, not sure who I'm going to vote for next time...it won't be for Foxx. I'm ticked with finding out the COOL was included in the budget. Dumb decision.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Reader. I have always supported Foxx but her vote on the budget has totally turned me off. I will vote for Curran in the primary. If Foxx wins the primary, I will probably end up voting for her again in the general. I won't vote Democrat.

USS Rodger Young said...

The infamous Blowing Rock Land Trade did it for many a few years back when Foxx helped the crooked Blowing Rock Town Council trade land for views. The recent budget vote was not a revelation but another validation of what conservatives have known for a long time.

Reader said...

I had looked up who was running against her before commenting. I too will support Curran. Sounds like she is a conservative...for now. Foxx really surprised me with this decision on voting for the budget, then finding out some of the things in it. Like I said, I'm really ticked off.

USS Rodger Young said...

I don't know who I will vote for, but it won't be Virginia Foxx. I will have to see what Curran's stance is on things and whether or not she is a Constitutional Conservative in favor of gun rights. Also, if Curran wants to deport criminals (illegal aliens) then it will work in her favor. Time will tell.

USS Rodger Young said...

What happened to Cycraps and Little Brau? Heat got a little hot!! LOL

Cyclops said...

Ry: I am traveling this week. Don,t have time to read your inane comments, much less respond.

Btw, I am supporting Virginia Foxx 's reelection. It makes little sense to support a candidate who will be nothing more than a back bencher when our current staunch conservative is an influential leader in the House. Curran has little chance to defeat Ms. Foxx and I suspect she is just hoping for name recognition so she will have an advantage when Foxx retires from Congress.

Anonymous said...

You may be right, Cyclops. I expect Foxx will easily win her primary. BUT, she will win it without my vote. The first time since she first ran for the House that I have not supported her.
I've just had enough with the Repubs talking one thing but then not backing it up with their actions. Her vote on the budget bill has convinced me that I can no longer support her as long as there is a more conservative choice available to me. Even if she wins, I will take some satisfaction in knowing that I tried to at least send her a message.
I will support the GOP candidate in the general election - Foxx or Curran.