This blog originally founded by Blogger who holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Did Someone Forget to Send Romney the Memo You're History

16 comments:

Honest Debate said...

Mitt Romney is a good man, a bad candidate but a good man. I think he would have been a far better President than Obama and our economy, our security and our foreign policy would be in far better shape had he won. He is free to say what he wants and he is not irrelevant. Turning on him serves no purpose, it's kind of creepy.

I am not a Trump fan but will vote for him if he wins. I may turn into a Trump fan before he's done if he's elected. I may not. Personally I don't think he realizes the job is bigger than him, plus I think he's a clown. Having said that, if establishment Republicans try to pull some shenanigans to disqualify or otherwise trump Trump then I'll be in the streets with a pitchfork standing up for the will of the people against the establishment… and enjoying it to some extent. I'm still not going to trash Mitt for expressing his opinion.

USS Rodger Young said...

Honest Debate,

You say turning on Mitt Romney serves no purpose. This statement is precedent on one being aligned with Romney in the first place. True conservatives don't need to turn on Romney as we were against him in the first place. You must be talking about other establishment RINO liberals who still, somehow, think highly of him.

Romney, like RINO Richard Burr, Thom Tillis and a host of other liberal oppressors, is a dolt. He didn't have the guts to fight it out with Obummer, yet now he has the guts to go against a potential conservative? WTF? If he truly does go after Trump, it will backfire on him and the establishment Repthuglican idiots.

Honest Debate said...

USS Roger Young,

As I said, he was a bad candidate. Who said anything about going against a Republican candidate? I'd be aghast if he announced a bid or even an endorsement. I'm no fan of the establishment but I'm not afraid of a little speech.

Sarkazein said...

Romney is a Trumpaphobe.

Anonymous said...

I hope Trump is the nominee and that he is elected President. I can't wait to see all of these "true conservatives" explain their mistake in supporting Trump when he stabs them in the back the way they say RINOs have stabbed them in the backs. Then those of us with our eyes open can laugh at the way they were duped.

Can anyone here point me to the specific plan Trump has to build that wall and make Mexico pay for it? I want to know EXACTLY how he intends to get that done.

the REAL anonymous said...

He probably plans on digging footers, pouring concrete, laying block and topping it with barbed wire. Paint is an option.

Anonymous said...

"Real"Anonymous,
Your attempt at sarcasm only shows what an idiot you are. I'm not talking about the physical construction -- if that was the only issue, Trump could go build the wall today without being president. You apparently don't know how government works. How does he get Congress to authorize it? A president cannot spend one dime not authorized by Congress. How does he get Mexico to pay for it? What is his plan? Is he going to threaten a cessation of trade until they pony up the money? Will he use military force or the threat of force? What has he said about the specifics? Your response only shows that you don't know either.

Real Anonymous said...

Just because you are too stupid to frame your question intelligently doesn't mean that I shouldn't answer the stupid question you did ask instead of the stupid question you wanted to ask.

BTW..could you start signing as "stupid anonymous" so that we can just ignore your stupid posts? I mean, we can usually tell it's you by the second sentence or so but still, it would save us time if we could just ignore you before we read that far!

Anonymous said...

Wow. I must have really struck a nerve there! My question wasn't stupid, you are! You are incapable of reading this and understanding what I meant?

"Can anyone here point me to the specific plan Trump has to build that wall and make Mexico pay for it? I want to know EXACTLY how he intends to get that done."

That was my original question. You replied with smartass sarcasm. I pointed out the idiocy of your response and asked you to point me to where Trump has given a specific plan on HOW he intends to get Congressional authorization and HOW he intends to "force" Mexico to pay for the wall. You respond with, "You're stupid!" How intelligent! I'm so glad you have informed me of Trump's plan! You try to spin by saying, "I don't have to answer your stupid question" only because you CAN'T answer my "stupid" question and I know it. Using the word "stupid" five times in a single post demonstrates your limited vocabulary. AND you still haven't actually told us HOW Trump will get that wall built. Looks like YOU are the one who is stupid here, so why don't YOU sign your posts "Stupid Anonymous." Care to try again!

Real Anonymous said...

Thanks you, Stupid Anon, for proving my point.

Show us more! We love watching you embarrass yourself without even knowing it!

More, PLEASE!

Brilliant Anon said...

I am afraid you are the only one here showing your stupidity ("Thanks you?")! You are actually employing the very same technique that Trump himself has used so well to fool you! Rather than answer a specific question with specific details, you (and he) turn to a personal attack on the questioner, whether it be a reporter or opposing candidate. Attempting to attack me personally is failing to cover up your inability to, in any way whatsoever, inform us as to the Donald's plan. You just can't do it, can you? Because he has never said HOW he will do it. You have no answer, so you will substitute personal attacks in place of an actual answer. Any high school debater could easily see through your pathetic smear attempts as a sign of your ignorance. And every time you post in reply to me without ACTUALLY ANSWERING only reinforces your ignorance.

Brilliant Anon said...

And if you can't answer a "stupid" question, what does that say about YOUR intelligence? You are simply over-matched here, my small-brained friend!

Real Anonymous said...

thanks Stupid Anon for adopting an ID we can recognize and thus avoid having to actually read part of your stupid posts before we recognize it's only you again.


MUCH BETTER!!

Brilliant Anon said...

Aaannnndddd, STILL no answer! Your ignorance is showing. I don't blame for not wanting to read my posts. They embarrass you! You're just too stupid to be able to reply!

What is Trump's plan for building the wall? How will he get Mexico to pay for it? You're ready to vote for this guy because he tells you he's going to build you a wall -- even though he will not tell you HOW he's going to do it -- and you accuse ME of being stupid?!? Sucker!

Real Anonymous said...

Oh Yes!

This is SO much better.

Much more peaceful.....and, now that we can ID the stupid posts without reading them, the blog IQ rises substantially.

Brilliant Anon said...

Still refusing to answer.........

"Not" reading my posts (which I know you actually are) is much like a child that shuts his eyes tight, sticks his fingers in his ears and shouts, "I can't hear you, I can't hear you!" What have YOU contributed to the IQ of this blog? I simply posed a question. Your contribution thus far has been a sarcastic non-answer and repeated posts calling me stupid and claiming not to read my posts, to which you immediately reply. You've definitely brought the maturity level of this blog to an all time low.

How will Trump get Congressional authorization? How will he force Mexico to pay for it? Any other Trump supporters wish to help out this poor dullard?