This blog originally founded by Blogger who holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Transgender in Women's Bathroom (Social Experiment)

13 comments:

Sarkazein said...

That is reality. To do it HM's way, the tranny would first have to pass a test and get a license or a note from HM saying he/she/? is both sincere and "far enough along" (perty enough) to pass as an official "transsexual".

Anonymous said...

I am avoiding all of these issues. I now self identify as a dog and now I just pee on fire hydrants.

Anonymous said...

http://townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/2016/04/20/creators-oped-n2151056

"The rules of bigotry according to the left represent a constantly shifting kaleidoscope of nonsense. This week, we learned that if you don't want your small daughter peeing next to a giant man who thinks he is a woman, you are a bigot; if you are a woman who is uncomfortable with a man who thinks he is a woman whipping out his male genitalia to urinate in front of you, you are a bigot; if you are a religious person who doesn't want to participate in an activity you consider sinful, you are a bigot.

Conversely, if you are a man who thinks he is a woman and you want to force a small girl to pee next to you, you are a freedom fighter; if you are a large man who thinks he is a woman and you want to be one of the girls, right down to hulking into a Macy's ladies room, you are a hero; if you are a gay man and you want to force a religious person to serve you, you are a hero."

Anonymous said...

More from above article:

"The baseline definition of freedom in Western Civilization has been this: You do not get to force me to serve you, and you do not get to force me to think the way you want me to think. As follows, you cannot force me to think that you are a woman if you are a biological man. You cannot force me to spend my taxpayer dollars to pretend along with your mental illness. You cannot force me to run my business as you see fit because I have no affirmative duty to you."

Maggie in Indiana said...

I wonder how the writers of this bill would feel if their little girl was flashed by Bubba in the ladies room. This is a mess.

Anonymous said...

I'm Not worried about Transgender. Never was. I do have a question for men who have daughters. Do you believe there are individuals (not transgender) out there that prey on our children? If you do then do you believe a pedophile or an individual with the intent of sexual assaulting your child would take advantage of this law to legally enter a shower room or locker room with your daughter or wife? If you answered yes to these two questions, how many children would you be willing to sacrifice (to include your own) to uphold this law so you could accommodate the LGBT community? This isn't about LGBT and it isn't about civil rights. Never was. Its about common sense.

Sarkazein said...

Liberals are consistent in most all of their arguments. Consistently dishonest. With Conservative's anti- ILLEGAL alien political stance, liberals replace ILLEGAL alien with immigrant.

Now, with the commingle bathroom/locker room issue the liberals leave out the pervert problem it allows, drop the Q only for discussion reasons (LGBT Q ) and say it's only about those who are "far enough along" in the "transgender" process. This is consistent with liberals saying Conservatives want to "disenfranchise" Black people, as if only Black people will be required to ID themselves at the polls.

Reader said...

I like this guy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceS_jkKjIgo

Sarkazein said...

Reader- Your link does speak to the immaturity characteristics of liberals and liberalism. It is something parents have to go over with little children as a matter of good parenting. I hope that guy is on a college circuit and is always allowed to speak. The people listening to it in person will enjoy it, but those who have only heard about it might come and disrupt the lecture.

Reader said...

He's a comedian so he can get away with it, Sark.

Anonymous said...

James O'Keefe came to Boone and ASU and filmed undercover regarding transgenders in restrooms (also UNC Asheville):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrrBlS7NLtU

Claimed to be a guy who just wanted to use the women's room "for the women." Another undercover woman said she wanted to go into men's room because "there are guys in there." Both of them talk to university officials. Gotta watch...

Where did HM run off to? Guess his wife found out what he was saying and set him straight. How could any woman be married to a man who says, "Honey, I think it's fine if a strange guy wants to go into the restroom with you and our daughter!"

Anonymous said...

ASHEVILLE, N.C. – Could gender neutral bathrooms be used to provide the ultimate cover for sexual exploitation? Going straight to the heart of the current bathroom controversy, Project Veritas went undercover in North Carolina to find out and is releasing their findings in this new video.

Perhaps the most egregious of the hidden camera interviews was with Jill Moffitt, Associate Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs and Title IX Administrator at the University of North Carolina – Asheville. When our male undercover journalist told Moffitt that he enjoys taking snapchats of females in the women’s bathroom, the following conversation transpired:

MALE JOURNALIST: There has been some snapchats but they self-destruct.

UNC ADMINISTRATOR: Well they don’t really self-destruct.

MALE JOURNALIST: I hope they self-destruct.

ADMINISTRATOR: You’re taking snap chats of women? You’re alerting me to what we call “sexual exploitation.” Don’t tell me anything more… Don’t tell me anything more… When people take…don’t say anything just listen.

Sarkazein said...

There is probably a form the administrator had to fill out after the discussion with the undercover journalist. I would like to see how it was pencil whipped.