This blog originally founded by Blogger who holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Today's Wall Street Journal Worth Buying For Front Page and Editorial Page Alone

  "This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions," (Comey admits)
 
"So there it is in the political raw: One standard exists for a Democratic candidate for President and another for the hoi polloi. We’re not sure if Mr. Comey, the erstwhile Eliot Ness, intended to be so obvious, but what a depressing moment this is for the American rule of law. No wonder so many voters think Washington is rigged for the powerful."
 
"By a reasonable person’s standards, Mrs. Clinton’s decision to use a private server, to give her aides access to it, to email classified information on it, to fail to secure it, and to use it in hostile territory was grossly negligent. We can’t wait for the next minion prosecuted for mishandling secrets to invoke the "extremely careless" defense".
 
"We almost wish Mr. Comey had avoided his self-justifying, have-it-both-ways statement and said bluntly that he couldn’t indict Mrs. Clinton because the country must be spared a Donald Trump Presidency. It would have been more honest and less corrosive to democracy than his Clinton Standard."   Gleanings from   WSJ  editorial. Blogger's emphasis.

6 comments:

Blogger said...

Sark, Thanks for fighting in the trenches today. I was so bummed out, it took me until tonight to find the perfect post.

Sarkazein said...

Blogger- The official evidence/accusations of incompetence and lying only strengthen Hillary's support with Democrats. She would be as popular as Bill if only she raped or molested someone and then lied to them about it.

Sarkazein said...

Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers say Jeffrey helped start the Clinton Foundation. Since he is a convicted sex offender with under age girls (minors), he qualifies for Hillary's and Anonymous's choice for VP running mate.

Sarkazein said...

I had thought the fix was in for Hillary because of the obvious Lynch/Bill meeting, the AF 1 ride to a campaign site for Hillary, Obama signaling to the FBI and Lynch that he believed Hillary did nothing wrong leading up to the end of the investigation. THEN, as I was listening to Comey's statement, I said he was going to recommend indictment so I was wrong... BUT, the fix was in after all. The obvious was the obvious.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure you will separate yourself from Roger Ailes, just to be consistent. He has been feeding you crap for 30 years and you have been a willing consumer. Bon apetit!

Anonymous said...

The Facts, something you are always willing to distance yourself from in favor of self-serving confirmation bias, did not warrant charges. Else, those charges would have been wrought. This blog is typical in baseless, irrational, hysterical nonsense. I find you entertaining, pitiable and sad.