This blog originally founded by Blogger who holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Monday, August 1, 2016

Here Comes The Clinton Machine on Steroids

  "The big thing we found out in the convention is exactly how Democrats will attempt to dismantle Mr. Trump piece by piece. (They'll say)He’s not just reckless, he’s ridiculous—a fraud in business, a screwball, unserious and uninformed about policy. They’ll try to drive him crazy, too, quite deliberately. They’ll do this not by quoting him accurately and denouncing his views, but by misquoting him, putting a twist on what he said, and then denouncing him. They’ll try to get him to whine, whinge, blow his top. They’re doing it already, to their profit. They’ll play the picador tormenting the bull, goading him, weakened, into an unfortunate charge."  (From Peggy Noonan "A Disunited Party's Successful Convention WSJ July 30-31)

5 comments:

Blogger said...

I just hope the Donald reads the WSJ.

Anonymous said...

They can direct quote Komrade Trump. There is no need for any suggestion of misquoting or context. Komrade Trump is quite clear with his context.

Sarkazein said...

Who is "Komrade Trump"?

Sarkazein said...

The Democrats are not restricted by the truth. They will say Mr Trump said what they wanted him to have said and the MSM will salute and follow their orders. This might be why anyone who is running for high office cannot say what is on his mind. If you are a Leftist, the MSM will correct it for you or ignore it (you didn't build that).

Blogger said...


One informed commentator now says the MSM are 100% behind stopping Trump. Not 90 or 80 but 100.

Sark, you are right in your response to Anon 7:59. By the way Anon, the context is Hillary's illegally deleted e-mails, not Russia. But I would not expect you to understand that.