This blog originally founded by Blogger who holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Attorney Generals Should not be Girly Men

   If Sessions had any testicles, he would have Rosenstein shut down the Mueller investigation.  Rosenstein could justify it because the whole investigation has become tainted.  
Stacked Deck


Of the 15 attorneys currently on staff for Mueller, at least seven have donated to Democratic candidates and campaigns, including Trump's 2016 rival Hillary Clinton. Of the rest, none have donated to Trump. Mueller’s star witness is the very person, Comey, that Trump fired.  He also may be guilty of a crime.  And, Mueller and Comey are very close.

Mueller is loading himself up with very expensive attorneys at taxpayer expense.  He was given a narrow mandate but from which he has already begun to go off the reservation.

Sessions could save his own job–save the country wrenching agony–and let us get on with the country’s business.  If Sessions and Rosenstein do no shut down the investigation, I will rejoice to see them go.


5 comments:

Sarkazein said...

One of the many weird things about the way President Trump is covered in the news is when Trump makes a statement, sometimes in answer to a question, his words are expanded on like nothing I have ever seen before. In an interview Trump was asked about Session's recusal. Trump said if he had known Sessions was going to recuse himself he would have picked a different AG. That was what he said. From that one expressed thought, Linsey Graham says- If Trump fires Sessions it will mark the beginning of the end of his presidency. All Trump had said was he would have picked someone else if he knew about the recusal. Obviously he would have picked someone who had no involvement in the campaign if it meant anyone in his campaign who said howdy to a Russian would have to recuse.

Anonymous said...

Newt Gingrich is in no position to question the ethics or character of someone of Mullah's reputation.

Sarkazein said...

Typical Leftist defending the Mullahs.

Sarkazein said...

When lawyers donate heavily to a political party, it is not because they have strong Left leanings or any core political beliefs for that matter. They donate heavily because they know they can buy a Democrat's influence or access. I am not concerned about these lawyers donating to Hillary. They know more about pay to play than most people do. Most lawyers want to show themselves as the smartest people in the room. If it is the Democrats who broke all the laws, the lawyers will want to show that they knew all along who the bad actors are. It is ego and not ethics that will guide these lawyers. I believe it is the Democrats who will be hurt by this investigation no matter the history of the investigators. It will end up as a final purge of the Clinton Crime Family. Wasserman Schultz just might be the first to fall.

Sarkazein said...

Wassermann Schultz will turn States evidence and spill the beans on everyone in the DNC. We might even find out why they had Seth Rich killed. The killing might lead first to Imran Awan (sp), the Democrat IT guy.