This blog originally founded by Blogger who holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Saturday, July 8, 2017

New Trump Prophecy Surfaces


A new prophecy regarding Trump has just surfaced from the 1980's. This time it is from a Catholic hermit, an American Tom Zimmer who lived in an Italian cathedral, spending his day attending multiple masses and praying. The hermit had communicated to a doctor that he, the hermit, had received a "premonition" which was that a certain man would lead America back to God. And that man would be none other than Donald J. Trump.

"The millionaire playboy from New York?" asks the incredulous doctor. "Yes," responds Tom. In fact, Zimmer was so convinced that Donald Trump would become a great spiritual leader of America that he wrote Trump’s name on a brick and had it placed in the reconstruction of St. Peter’s Holy Door after the Jubilee in order that Trump would receive blessings from the many Masses that would be said in the Vatican." (Donors who had given sums of money were allowed to place a brick with a name in the Vatican door.) Charisma
 

 

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Gary Trudeau with Doonesbury Cartoons were published in major newspapers across the world nearly 30 years ago, I'll bet it was Gary Trudeau's prophecy not God's this man saw.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2016/06/23/how-doonesbury-predicted-donald-trumps-presidential-run-29-years-ago/?utm_term=.5fd7ebf9e361

USS Rodger Young said...

Better than your prophecy which was "Machts Niches Bitches." Obviously prophesizing isn't your thing noneymouse coward. You best stay away from that or your will look even dumber than you did when Trump and Handel won. LOL. We won, you LOST.

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

Anonymous said...

RY

Sorry, I have little knowledge of what ever your posting about. I do know there's a small child in The UK with extreme birth defects which are almost certainly going to prevent this baby from growing to maturity.
Here in the USA GOP attacks on Obamacare would deprive over 22 million citizens from healthcare, causing tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths.
Conservative public policy are cruel and favor only the wealthiest citizens.

USS Rodger Young said...

Here we have it again - when liberal socialist sheep don't want to talk about a particular subject, they claim no knowledge of said subject. I've detailed this phenomenon many times on this site, and noneymouse coward has undoubtedly been chastised for doing this very thing in the past. I guess he claims no knowledge of this either.

It stands to reason you wouldn't know "there's a small child in the UK with extreme birth defects which are almost certainly going to prevent this baby from growing to maturity" when you get your narrow scope news from MSNBC or CNN. You continue ignorance because the extremist news sources you listen don't want the sheep (you) to understand just how malicious socialized health care really is. It's telling in your description of the child by the fact the only thing you do claim to know revolved around "extreme birth defects." How come your news sources didn't explain that the parents of the child are not allowed to take him home to die? Or to be transferred, at the parent's expense, to the United States for world class health care (non-socialized)? Or that the British government calls all the shots in Charlie Gard's health care, not the parents. How come you don't know his name? Reminds me of serial killers who look at victims as objects and never refer to them by name. The babies you support killing through abortion, what do you refer to them as?

Very telling you don't know these details. Or maybe you do and want to continue to offline and dodge the tough questions.

So let's get liberal socialist sheep reasoning straight - without obummercare, tens of thousands would die? Really. Funny, I never heard of the tens of thousands dying from lack of care before obummercare. The reason is because they were already aided by our world class health care system. I don't recall any Watauga County residents dying after they were turned away from Watauga County Hospital. Do you? LOL, tough questions. The only ones I know that died after being refused treatment were veterans at the VA hospitals. VA Hospitals are socialized healthcare my confused friend. Then again, you spit on returning veterans and treat them like Charlie Gard - no names ever mentioned. The only ones that should be turned away are illegal aliens who have taxed our healthcare system beyond capacity. 50 million disease ridden, low education criminals will do that to a society every time. Luckily we, under YOUR President, are taking steps to rid the country from this scourge.

Once the illegal aliens are gone, our health care system under pay as you go will continue to be the best in the world. Much to the chagrin of liberal extremists (you), the United States health care system developed into the world's very best, not with government intervention, but under a capitalist society that allows innovation and creativity to flourish. Creativity and innovation are two concepts foreign to liberal socialist sheep which is why the rest of the world never seems to invent anything.

Stings don't it

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

Alan Bosch

Anonymous said...

RY

You seem to believe as I do that healthcare is a basic human right. The question than becomes how is it to be paid for and delivered?
Under today's medical technology a concrete block can be kept alive almost indefinitely. These are often controversial ethical questions the medical profession, insurance providers, families and politicians rightfully debate. Conservative oversimplification of these issue is dishonest.
In the case of Charlie Gard this is the UK Court 's decision. "The domestic courts concluded that it would be lawful for the hospital to withdraw life sustaining treatment because it was likely that Charlie would suffer significant harm if his present suffering was prolonged without any realistic prospect of improvement, and the experimental therapy would be of no effective benefit," a press release from the court announcing the decision said." http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/27/health/charlie-gard-european-court-ruling-bn/index.html
I take strong exception to the issue of VA. The VA has a long history of excellent care. Currently the VA is overwhelmed with GOP budget funding while in the faced with continuous wars started under a GOP President and continued under President Obama for the last 16 year. The World War II and Korean Vets are at the end of their lives and the Vietnam era vets are now in failing health. For Profit insurance healthcare institutions want to get to the VA funding. What you'r reading is half truths from their propaganda.

USS Rodger Young said...

noneymouse coward,

I'm not a communist and I don't believe health care is a right of anyone - especially when it comes from my pocketbook. You may be ok with collectivism, but I'm not, nor is most of this country.

You frame the issue as if courts, government, physicians have a definitive say in a families medical choices because such choices are too complicated for sheeple to make. On one hand you want the choice to rip a living baby from the womb, no questions asked, but on the other feel it's now ok that people other than the family have a say so in killing Charlie Gard (you suddenly learned a little more about little Charlie I see). Your hypocrisy is limitless. Under "today's medical technology" I make the decisions, all of them, not strangers and especially not the government. This is anathema to the collectivist mindset, except in the case of baby killing (abortion), but free thinking conservatives are not burdened by the inability to form their own opinions and thoughts. If you want others to make decisions for your families health care, then be my guest. Just don't force others to do the same (communism).

If the VA had a long history of excellent care then we wouldn't be burdened with VA scandal after VA scandal across several administrations. You conveniently say it's due to GOP funding, yet VA conditions plagued obummer his entire term. That was Democratic controlled. Same for the Clinton era. Forgot about those 16 collective years didn't you. LOL! As for "continuous wars" it seems one Hussein obummer was no stranger to creating war and destabilizing entire regions of the planet (Arab Spring anyone) which killed hundreds of thousands and caused more veterans to need care. For someone who supported both spitting on returning Vietnam veterans and Democratic inspired legislation to label hundreds of thousands of Middle East veterans as "defective" to take away 2nd Amendment Rights, you are part of the problem, not the solution. The VA is another bloated federal agency and a shining example of why we should never go to socialized medical care.

Stings don't it

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

Anonymous said...

RY

VA funding comes from the Republican congress, not the President.

USS Rodger Young said...

VA funding came from a Democratic Congress under Hussein obummer, billary Clinton, and jimmy carter (notice lower case). If you're making the case that the VA has somehow went to pieces under the Republican Congress then you're, as usual, not making sense. What you're trying to get away from with your one line quip, is the fact the VA represents the failed socialized medicine system you want so bad. With veterans turned away to die to government bureaucrats cooking the books, it all points to the sad fact that government is best left out of healthcare.

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

Anonymous said...

RY

This is factual information which is searchable and well documented. President Obama only had the support of a Democratic Congress for The first 18 months. Republicans either controlled or had the power to block VA funding for the next 6.5 years.

USS Rodger Young said...

With hussein obummer, Republicans didn't control funding. obummer had veto power over Republican Bills that might have decreased funding to this bloated agency. Additionally, VA problems don't revolve around money despite money being the cure for all evils in the eyes of collectivist liberals (you). Leading at the VA requires competent, forward thinking leaders. In other words, not liberals. Obummer planted political appointee after political appointee, as well as members of the Senior Executive Service (SES), into key positions at the VA. Even with unlimited funding, these appointees couldn't lead a prostitute to a hotel. And they didn't. The most recent VA scandals emerged under a Democratic administration as much as you want to try and blame republicans. Hussein obummer owns the failed VA lock, stock and barrel. As I said before, the VA is a prime example of why America doesn't need socialized health care. Anything the government touches is a failure.

Your ole pal

USS Rodger Young

Anonymous said...

RY

The president can only veto what come to his desk. Republicans stated their number one priority ( not jobs, not anti terrorism, not healthcare, not the economy, ) was making Obama a one term president.

USS Rodger Young said...

I remember Republicans saying "jobs stupid" while Dumpocrats were busy wrecking the VA.

Anonymous said...

RY

There were 11.3 million jobs created under President Obama and 2.1 million under Bush.

USS Rodger Young said...

noneymouse coward,

concentrate my drug addled friend. More people on food stamps, unemployed, and on public assistance under obummer than any other President in history.

USS Rodger Young said...

Anything to say about Charlie Gard noneymouse coward? Are you unhappy that the nanny state hasn't killed little Charlie yet?

USS Rodger Young

USS Rodger Young said...

Notice how noneymouse coward and the rest of the liberal sheep won't touch the Charlie Gard story. It shows how dangerous and extremist that socialized medicine truly is.