This blog,originally founded by Blogger, who is listed in Marquis Who's Who and is a recipient of the Albert Nelson Marquis Lifetime Achievement Award. He holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Lindsey Graham destroys Eric Holder

THIS SAYS IT ALL!

62 comments:

Liberal POV said...

Blogger

Keep selling fear and helping achieve the goal of the terrorist in frightening the American Public.

Rove and O'Reilly are assisting in with the same objective of Osama Bin Ladin in generating fear when courage is what is needed to defeat terrorism.

Terrorism is a tactic, stop assisting that tactic.

Be real Americans and quit cowering. Damn Chicken Hawks Rush,Rove, Cheney and O'Reilly

Sarkazein said...

It all boils down to radical liberalism. It can only be defended in theory and not in reality.
This is why there are so many radical Leftist professors, liberalism only works in classrooms and in books, but not in the real world.
Holder/Obowma are now in the real world.

Sarkazein said...

POV-

As this post/Grahams comments were addressing actions by AG Holder/Obowma, your comment can only be translated as AG Holder/Obowma are attempting to terrorize America with their actions

guy faulkes said...

POV is proof that the Obama administration has helped further terrorism and those that support them. POV says that the thousands killed on 9/11 should be dismissed along with the uncountable number of future victims. It is all right for them to commit any acts they wish as long as we do not do anything of which POV disapproves. Terrorism is a tactic. Pov supports and is an accomplice to this tactic.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

I know your slow so let me rephrase for you.

Terrorism is a tactic to create fear and panic within a large population by a small number of extremist to achieve a political objective.

Those on the right have been assisting the spread of that fear at every opportunity instead of incouraging public courage and resistance. The obsession of revenge and make me safe is not our best tactic to respond. Public courage is the primary tool needed to make terriorism ineffectivefollowed by good police work and measured military action.

Many of those behind the spread of that fear are chicken hawks Rush, O"Reilly, Rove, Rumsfelt and Cheney.
Al Qeada could not have inflicted the damage done to this country with attacks we have done in ourselves in response to 9/11.
We have gotten close to 5000 men and women killed. We have 30,000 severely wounded. We have shamed ourselves with torture and human rights abuse. We have wasted 2-4 trillion dollars and nearly destroying our economy.
AlQeada is likely stronger than ever with your help.
Have some courage Guy.

Sarkazein said...

AG Ashcroft said AG Holder has no legal standing to move terrorists from Military to civilian court.
So it is either Obowma's decision or it is AG Holder's and Obowma's lie or ignorance.
This is why he could not answer Lindsey Grahams's question. All previous AGs and Presidents were not so deceitful or ignorant.

guy faulkes said...

Obama's apology tour, his hesitancy on Afghanistan, and the return to the pre-9/11 mentality exhibited by many including traitors that actively support terrorism will cause many other costly terrorist acts in this country. These traitors such as POV will have the blood of these innocent victims on their hands. We will then have to start the process of containing these terrorists all over again. POV and his conspirators will also have the blood of the many servicemen that have already given their lives to combat terrorism and those that will have to do so in the future. I do not see how POV can live with himself.

I am beginning to see how POV can be such an ardent supporter of abortion. One murderer may have empathy for another.

Blogger said...

"Pov supports and is an accomplice to this tactic."

I agree Guy, because POV is the poster child for the people Obama and Holder are trying to please.
When we get hit again, that whole crowd carries the blame. Every life lost is on them.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

9/11 was eight years ago.

How is hyping fear anything but encouraging terrorism?
That is what the Chicken Hawks have been doing.
Terrorism is only effective when fear is produced.

Go be a cheerleader.

Liberal POV said...

Blogger and Guy


"Pov supports and is an accomplice to this tactic."

Why would you post what you know to be a lie?

Why do you have to resort to not only personal attacks but lies because you don't have good arguments?

guy faulkes said...

POV, your comments have proven what we say to be true. The sad thing is that you do not recognize what you are.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

You're the one spreading fear, following the Chicken Hawks and taking the path the extremist want.

Anonymous said...

Faux the Sockpuppet:
I know what YOU are- Beck's Boy-Toy. LOL!

BikerBard said...

Liberal POV:
Faux following the "Chicken Hawks." Funny - that's also a slang term for men who love boys. Wow, Lib POV, you nailed it! Both ways!

guy faulkes said...

POV is supported by BB. If this does not indicate the ineptitude of his arguments, nothing will. That BB has a problem in resolving his sexual conflicts is certainly apparent.

Simon Jester said...

Off topic email from a friend:

We were in Pigeon Forge over the week end. We left to come home on
Sunday. Traffic was moving slowly, and a car in front of us had an Obama bumper sticker on it. It read: "Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8".

Bill's Bible was lying on the dash board & he got it & opened it up to the scripture & read it. He started laughing & laughing. Then he read it to me. I couldn't believe what it said. I had a good laugh, too.

Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. "

BikerBard said...

No conflicts here, Bro. You started this sub-topic. Now you can reap the results.

But how lame is it to disavow Lib POV's arguments because I agree with them, and how equally lame is it to call your Tea Bag girlfriends out to help poor little Fauxie?

Don't mess with me and don't start what you can't finish, you NAMBLA pantywaist!

guy faulkes said...

For BB

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdbt-sx5MDc

With support from BB, who cares what POV thinks?

Sarkazein said...

Simon Jester-

Thanks, I've already posted the Psalm number on my FaceBook page (friends don't expect religious posts from me). Hopefully the other Biblical comparisons are not correct.

BikerBard said...

Sorry Faux, not playing your You-Tube promo for NAMBLA. LOL!

Keep calling on your girlfriends for help! ROTFLMAO!

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Sheep POV said:

"Terrorism is a tactic to create fear and panic within a large population by a small number of extremist to achieve a political objective."

If that is the case then why is the Ft. Hood shooter not labeled a terrorist while a gunman in Seattle who killed a cop is? It seems your definition of terrorism is not upheld by the fringe left media you support. Why is this?

your old pal
Johnny Rico

Isaac

Johnny Rico said...

Tricycle Lard Cheerleader said:

"and how equally lame is it to call your Tea Bag girlfriends out to help poor little Fauxie?"

By what you say, I can only assume you seek to demean me. Why would it be inferior to call out someone's girlfriend to defend a subject or person? Do we not live in a society of equal rights? Or are you one of those silly little libertards who doesn't really buy into the very non-discrimination laws promulgated by your own party? In past threads you have also drawn reference to the gay people as if being a gay person was somehow beneath you. Is this true? So yo demean women like me and secretly feel being gay is an insult? Wow!! I have had relations with other women from time to time; does this upset you or make you uncomfortable? You should check your feelings and troubling speech patterns at the "power on" switch. You look more ignorant every day. You are the most judgemental socialist sheep on this site.

Johnny Rico

deb

Honest Debate said...

Ms. Rico,

Good one.

Honest Debate said...

Lindsey Graham came to prominence as a "House Manager" during the Clinton impeachment. He was great then (although I'm now inclined to look up his vote) and was great with Holder. He's a JAG and this stuff is right up his ally.

He has helped our country and the party for what seems like common sense. This was big. The AG dragged down for hearings and drilled by Graham made news, sound bytes ensued. Graham's penchant for sucking up to the left has actually given him needed credibility on this issue. Damage was done to Holder and by extension Obama. Unfortunately the trial is still on.

Mr. Graham is in trouble back home. The Legislature even threatened to censor him for his support of cap and trade. He's a McCain sycophant, big time.

How can someone be so right on with his very public criticism and at the same time be such a weasel?

guy faulkes said...

This thread has taken an interesting turn. As Rico has indicated, there is a huge double standard among liberals.

They indicate they are the tolerant end of the spectrum, but they disprove it every day by their actions. They say they support homosexuals, but they attack Patrick McHenry with anti-gay accusations. BB has been accused of being gay by many members of two separate blogs, but appears to take offense at the accusations. If he was tolerant of homosexuals, the accusations would not matter.

Liberals indicate they want equality for all. They support affirmative action that gives some people preferential treatment over others. We are not considered equal citizens of the United States. Instead we are Afro-Americans, Hispanic Americans, etc. It is interesting that the concept of diversity appears to only go one way.

The most telling example of this double standard is the abortion issue. A woman's "right to choose" takes prescience over a child's right to live or a father's right to his offspring.

If you want to discuss discrimination, the group most discriminated against in this country are white, religious, heterosexual, male, working class, people. An even more discriminated sub set can be achieved by adding "that live in the south".

Back on topic: Mr. Graham is indeed a liberal. However, the Obama administration and its policies are so ridiculous, not even he can support them. His disagreements with these policies are therefore more telling as one expects him to fall in line. He is a weasel, but there are some things even a weasel cannot condone.

Darn you HD, now I have to apologize to weasels everywhere for the insulting comparison.

BikerBard said...

Faux:
The only one playing that game is you, girl. What, the NAMBLA meeting just end? Give Rico a kiss!

Johnny Rico re; thanks said...

Honest Debate,

Thank you Honest. We are all fighting the good fight!!!!

Johnny

Johnny Rico said...

Tricycle Lard Cheerleader said:

"The only one playing that game is you, girl. What, the NAMBLA meeting just end? Give Rico a kiss!"

After the shellacking you have just recieved, this is all you can come up with? How do you even take yourself seriously? My guess is you have certain problems that hamper your ability to fully integrate within society. You are incomplete in some way unknown to us. To compensate, you try and place yourself on a judgement pedestal in which you make it appear you are superior to all others. Because we are tolerant conservatives, we tolerate you and allow you to spout your stupidity without banning you. I would even care to venture a guess that you aren't really liked by your own which is one reason you are here. Now Watauga Watch on the other hand has to ban those that give differing viewpoints. LOL! Also, it is quite evident you did not have a father figure in your life. That is too bad. Your intimidation at being referenced as a homosexual, libertard, or other truism has its roots in the fact you were left to fend for yourself during your formulative years. Your correspoinding compensation for lack of a father figure is to take offense to that which you fear or don't understand. Tricyle, I do feel bad at folks who started at a disadvantage. I also think it is important to realize life does not have to be this way. It is changeable even at this late juncture. Give it a try and free yourself from your ills. Finding God is a good place to start, but is by no means the only way. Do something that makes you feel good about yourself. Join big brothers, big sisters. Take a kid hunting. The point is to do something. As much as we disagree (due to you being wrong on everything), as a fellow human I truly do wish the best for you. You deserve to live a happy life as do all here. Reach out and grab for it Tricycle. I will say a prayer for you tonight.

Johnny Rico

BikerBard said...

Rico/Debbie/RuPaul:

No thank you. Save your prayers for yourself. You are one, sick pup. Pray hard!

"Physician, heal thyself."
-Luke 4:23

Johnny Rico said...

I like Ru Paul. I accept him for what he/her is. Do you?

I will pray for you nontheless my poor, poor friend. Perhaps you can one day find the peace that has alluded you since your young days. Set yourself free Tricycle Lard, set yourself free.........

Liberal POV said...

JR and Guy

I'm glad to see the conservative movement has come around to supporting full rights for homosexuals.

Does this include an anti bulling law?

How about marriage if the couple want to be married?

Adoption rights?

This is wonderful has Ms Foxx approved this thinking or will you have to retact your comments?

Liberal POV said...

Guy

"They say they support homosexuals, but they attack Patrick McHenry with anti-gay accusations."

Patrick McHenry is attacked because of his gross hypocrisy not his sexual orientation.

guy faulkes said...

POV, I do not care if you call it marriage or a civil union. They have equal legal implications.

What brought up bullying? What is the definition of bullying? Do you support children being able to use their right to defend themselves physically from an attacking bully? Should the no tolerance position just be for the initial aggressor? What do you think of what I was taught before I went to school? Never start a fight and never run from one.

You are being less than truthful (lying) when you say the attacks against McHenry on Watauga Watch were about hypocrisy. They attacked his sexuality. I do not know his sexual preference nor do I care. Neither do the conservatives that elect him to office. So much for liberals being the tolerant entity.

Rico brought to the attention of Watauga Watch and this blog her dissatisfaction with Ms. Foxx's handling of the Blowing Rock Land Trade. I agreed with Rico that she handled this poorly. You will never learn that conservatives expect their representatives to do just that, represent them. We want people that represent our thoughts and policies. Liberals want leaders to tell them what to think. This is why so many refer to liberals as sheep.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

"You are being less than truthful (lying) when you say the attacks against McHenry on Watauga Watch were about hypocrisy."

I can't speak for every one posting on WW I can only speak for myself and I do think McHenry shows gross hypocrisy almost to the point of playing conservative for fools.

http://www.democrats.com/patrick-mchenry-voter-fraud-sleepover-scandal

http://patgobyebye.blogspot.com/

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/04/rep-mchenry-calls-us-soldier-in-iraq-a-two-bit-security-guard/

BikerBard said...

REEK-O:

YOU have found inner peace? LOL!Whatcha smoking? Pray for yourself, sweetheart - you need the prayers more than I do!

guy faulkes said...

Nothing in any of POV's links speaks to hypocrisy by McHenry. They were political attacks on McHenry, the first being a sexual allegation with no proof. The second is about Enron. So what? The third is about a security guard that may have been overreacting. However, it is nice for POV to support one of our troops. This is a refreshing change, even if he is only doing it to attack a conservative Congressman. POV has posted nothing to counter any of my contentions.

How about some feedback on the bullying topic you brought up, POV?

How about an example of of your criticism of a liberal?

BB, I know of no one in more need of prayers than you. The fact you do not want them exemplifies this.

Johnny Rico said...

Looks like Tricycle Lard and Liberal Socialist Sheep POV have been taken to school by Guy Faulks.


And yes, Tricycle Lard, I did say a prayer for you in church today. They said we should be tolerant of others, and I immediately thought of you. At any rate, perhaps it will be you who will find peace with yourself one of these days.

Flying with the wrong crowd (fringe left) won't do it for you. They are too hate filled to find any peace.

Johnny Rico

BikerBard said...

REEK-O:
Here's your 6-Step Personal Improvement Plan:

#1. Buy a mirror
#2. Surround yourself with Sark, HD, Faux, Blogger, etc.
#3. Look into it
#4. Say, "They are too hate-filled"
#5. Repeat as often as is necessary
#6. Go back to church and pray HARD

Liberal POV said...

Guy

This says it better than I can

http://eqfed.org/equalitync/alert-description.tcl?alert_id=9857058

"Background Information
Take action to stop bullying and harassment in our schools!

Here are some key reasons to support House Bill 1366, the School Violence Prevention Act.

Students have a right to a sound basic education, but too often bullying and harassment interferes with that right.
Bullying that goes unaddressed also contributes to more severe violence, like school shootings. A study by the U.S. Secret Service indicates that a history of bullying was a factor in three-quarters of school shootings in recent years.
Because they feel unsafe, victimized youth are pushed out of schools and into high-risk behavior. These youth are more likely to skip school, drop out, engage in substance abuse, or worse.
Every student deserves to be treated with dignity and respect. Physical appearance, sexual orientation, and gender identity are the three most frequent reasons for bullying and harassment in schools, yet these types of bullying are often overlooked by school personnel.
This bill protects ALL students from bullying, and its inclusion of enumerated categories will provide clear direction to teachers, administrators, and students about the scope of the law. Teachers want clear policies that will give them the backing they need to address problems in the classroom and on the playground.
While harassment of any kind is unacceptable and should be dealt with quickly, firmly, and with appropriate consequences and remedies, certain groups of people have suffered systematic institutional prejudice, and discrimination and as a result are at a disproportionate risk of being the target of harassment and violence.
Strong laws against bullying and harassment are a growing trend. Just this March, Iowa became the tenth state to adopt an anti-bullying law including sexual orientation."

guy faulkes said...

POV, you did not answer my question. Does a young person have the right of self defense?

Bushrod Gentry said...

Recently, Bill O'Reilly interviewed Governor Sarah Palin on his talk show. He asked
her if she thought that she was smart enough to be president. Mrs. Palin replied
that she was due to her common sense and conservative principles. Here at The
Better Living Through Increased Taxation Foundation we believe her ansewr shows why
she is out of touch with the qualifications to be president in the 21st century. On
her behalf, we would like to point out that Mr. O'Reilly's question was far too
general. Such a question should be broken down into the following specific
questions: Are you prepared to lie? Are you prepared to lie repeatedly and often?
Are you prepared to forget campaign promises? Are you prepared to blame others for
your shortcomings? Are you ready to ignore the pleas of those suffering from your
policies? Are you willing to desecrate the Constitution? Can you read a
teleprompter? Are you willing to travel around the
globe apologizing for America and bowing to foreign dignitaries? Do you feel that
reading the bills that you sign into law is a waste of your time? Are you willing
to quadruple the national debt? Does yor agenda include making as many citizens as
possible dependent on big government? If the answer to any of these questions is
"No," then you are not fit to lead this nation into bankruptcy, have sex in the
Oval Office or send a thrill up Chris Matthews' leg. Go home to the hoi polloi. If
you dare voice your opinion in public again, then we will send the news madia and
Jon Stewart to villify and ridicule you. You are a homophobe and a racist and
what's worse, probably a Christian. Consider yourself lucky that we don't send
Michael Moore to make a movie about you. -----This message has been brought to
you by the angry white guys at MSNBC.

Recently, Bill O'Reilly interviewed Governor Sarah Palin on his talk show. He asked
her if she thought that she was smart enough to be president. Mrs. Palin replied
that she was due to her common sense and conservative principles. Here at The
Better Living Through Increased Taxation Foundation we believe her ansewr shows why
she is out of touch with the qualifications to be president in the 21st century. On
her behalf, we would like to point out that Mr. O'Reilly's question was far too
general. Such a question should be broken down into the following specific
questions: Are you prepared to lie? Are you prepared to lie repeatedly and often?
Are you prepared to forget campaign promises? Are you prepared to blame others for
your shortcomings? Are you ready to ignore the pleas of those suffering from your
policies? Are you willing to desecrate the Constitution? Can you read a
teleprompter? Are you willing to travel around the
globe apologizing for America and bowing to foreign dignitaries? Do you feel that
reading the bills that you sign into law is a waste of your time? Are you willing
to quadruple the national debt? Does yor agenda include making as many citizens as
possible dependent on big government? If the answer to any of these questions is
"No," then you are not fit to lead this nation into bankruptcy, have sex in the
Oval Office or send a thrill up Chris Matthews' leg. Go home to the hoi polloi. If
you dare voice your opinion in public again, then we will send the news madia and
Jon Stewart to villify and ridicule you. You are a homophobe and a racist and
what's worse, probably a Christian. Consider yourself lucky that we don't send
Michael Moore to make a movie about you. -----This message has been brought to
you by the angry white guys at MSNBC.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

Do you want school kids to have a right to carry?

Liberal POV said...

Bushrod Gentry

Are you and Oatz the same cut and paste person?

Simon Jester can't even do that.

Keep getting the hate fixes for your hate addiction.

How many of the questions are just down right silly?

The Acorn scandal seems to be the only thing the right have found that not just silly and it is about very low level employees with questionable journalism.

Where was your outrage when Bush was starting an unnecessary war in Iraq or the 35 or more other major scandals?

guy faulkes said...

Do you want school kids to have a right to carry? - POV

Those in college that have a concealed carry permit, yes, certainly. It would prevent tragedies such as Virginia Tech. Those that are to young still have a right to defend themselves. Teachers that have concealed carry permits should be allowed to carry in elementary and high schools.

Not everyone feels that terrorists or bullies should be given a free reign over the rest of us. As a matter of fact, you are one of the few I have ever communicated with that supports terrorism and bullies.

Also, POV your accusation of Bushrod Gentry plagiarizing his post by using cut and paste is ludicrous. I know you are not very well educated and have trouble communicating with those that have even a modicum of education, but you really need to try to understand the principle of sarcastic comment. I bet you think "Gulliver's Travels" was a group of children's stories and not political satire. (This assumes you know what "Gulliver's Travels" is.) You might want to go back and read other posts by Mr. Gentry. His "What Obama Really Said" posts were classic and much funnier than those on the " What liberals really mean" segments on Foxx news. Your jealousy is apparent.

AS for the rest of your post, yawn, ho hummmmm..... especially the part about Bush's war that has kept us from being attacked until the Obama apology tour and hesitancy over Afghanistan emboldened the terrorist at Fort Hood. Bush's problem was that he was not aggressive enough. As Rico said, Bush should have had the Islamic terrorists thinking whatever they do they better leave the U.S. alone.

Bushrod Gentry. said...

The double comments originate from my habit of typing in Word and pasting into the comment section. It is much easier to correct errors in Word. POV is correct that I paste my own work. I apparently double clicked the paste button. Sorry.

Honest Debate said...

"The Acorn scandal seems to be the only thing the right have found that not just silly and it is about very low level employees with questionable journalism." -LibertalPOV

Are ACORN employees journalist?

With the mountains of evidence Giles and O'Keefe have produced not to mention voter fraud investigations against ACORN in 14 states, how can you say it was low level employees? At the same time Bush himself (at Cheney's direction)ordered the incidents at Abu Graib.

Splain please.

Liberal POV said...

HD

Your silly over whelms your substance.

Honest Debate said...

Hmm...I thought it was a good question.

guy faulkes said...

The question was apparently to difficult for POV to be able to answer without conceding your point, HD.

Liberal POV said...

HD

"At the same time Bush himself (at Cheney's direction)ordered the incidents at Abu Graib. "

Those thing that lead to the men and women serving time in prison were drafted in the Bush Cheney White house. It's on the internet on white house stationary.
Rumsfelt pushed for the military to take the" gloves off " and find the missing weapons of mass destruction that were never found.

Here's a different spin on ACORN.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#33013202

Some has never smelled right about the ACORN attack.

Sounds like ACORN was doing their job too well.

Honest Debate said...

Lib,

You want me to listen the the "spin" of Rachel Maddow? Are you serious?

Look, ACORN is corrupt from top to bottom. That cannot be denied. Obama not only has ties to ACORN, it's his only claim to fame (community organizer)and he said he would let them "shape the agenda". It's nasty as heck and you look the other way.

The United States Military is not a corrupt organization.

guy faulkes said...

I will bore everyone by using the POV tactic of repeating the same thing over and over again. ACORN is so corrupt that a fair, unbiased, and through investigation of its actions and Obama's connection to the organization may lead to the impeachment of Obama and possibly Obama;s imprisonment if he is not pardoned.

Liberal POV said...

HD

ACORN was doing their job too well, the poor were getting a voice and being represented in government.
Lobbyist were hired to create a smear campaign against ACORN.
This smear campaign has been very successful with main stream media joining the slim balls of Fox.

Give me details of what laws were broken? Who's been charged? How much money has been spent on the smear campaign.
How many people voted that shouldn't have voted?
Remember that's voted not signed a voter register card as Mickey Mouse but went to the polls as Mickey Mouse? What is the total dollar amount involved in the so called ACORN scandal?
The poor have very little voice in government and Acorn was one of the few voices.
If this had been a major corporate enterprise do you think they would have received the media attention this voice for the poor has received?

This is the conservative way kick those that need a hand up.

guy faulkes said...

POV, I started to list some links to answer your questions, but thereare so many articles exposing the corruption and illegal activities of ACORN, that I decided to let you look for yourself. There are hundreds. I will list three pulled at random.

http://www.examiner.com/x-3704-Columbia-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m5d19-ACORN-whistleblowers-say-laws-were-broken

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2372344/posts

http://thedreamthatwasamerica.blogspot.com/2009/10/exposing-acorn-part-1.html


I wold have thought even you had more sense than to defend ACORN.

Honest Debate said...

Sorry lib,I can't help you. you're too far gone.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

You failed to list anything.

This is from your sites.

"Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. has agreed not to charge ACORN with violating a state law regarding quotas for registering voters, under an agreement reached in a federal lawsuit today"

Find the answers to these basic questions.

Give me details of what laws were broken? Who's been charged? How much money has been spent on the smear campaign.
How many people voted that shouldn't have voted?
Remember that's voted not signed a voter register card as Mickey Mouse but went to the polls as Mickey Mouse? What is the total dollar amount involved in the so called ACORN scandal?

I know what you think but what are the facts?

Liberal POV said...

HD or Blogger

Can either of you answer the following questions?

Give me details of what laws were broken? Who's been charged? How much money has been spent on the smear campaign.
How many people voted that shouldn't have voted?
Remember that's voted not signed a voter register card as Mickey Mouse but went to the polls as Mickey Mouse? What is the total dollar amount involved in the so called ACORN scandal?

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist POV said:

"Take action to stop bullying and harassment in our schools!"

Another stupid statement coming from a stupid socialist sheep. Ask yourself (like you have the brains to be able to talk to yourself) why there was not a bullying problem prior to 2009.

Perhaps if we imposed corporal punishment on children it would straighten them out in school. There are no punishment systems capable of grabbing the attention of out of control children.

And we should teach our children the value of taking up for themselves. Hard to bully someone trained not to be bullied now isn't it.

What I see here is the Nintendo/XBox/Sega generation clashing with the extreme tail end of the generation who still played outside, built forts in the woods, hunted with a family hound, etc...

As the parents and teachers continue to allow children to do as they please the problems will only get worse.

And the one common denominator in all this are the liberal socialist sheep policies that started it all. "Don't whip kids". "Too much libility for kids to play on the playground". "No fighting for anyone-even the kid getting picked on" and "guns and hunting are bad".

That sure doesn't leave a lot for our kids, but the liberal socialist sheep can't seem to smell the pile of dukey they have left society with.

Have anything to say about this Liberal Socialist Sheep POV. Your about an idiot, you know that. Using the Vietnam Vet thing as an excuse for your cowardly opinions shows just how far gone and pathetic your un-patriotic arse has gone!!!! LOL!!!!!!

Your ole pal
Johnny Rico

Kasey

Liberal POV said...

Johnny

I see you're as informed as usual.

Johnny Rico said...

another one sentence quip that says or answers nothing!!!

I rest my case.

guy faulkes said...

See the above ACORN thread for answers to your questions, POV. Can you not think up individual posts for each thread? Yawn, ho hummmmm....

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Sheep POV,

You have not answered to my post yet. Does this mean I am right in all that I say? If not, prove me wrong. LOL!!

This ought to be interesting

Johnny Rico

Billy

PS Or you could just let the thread run out and hope I will forget about it (I won't)