This blog,originally founded by Blogger, who is listed in Marquis Who's Who and is a recipient of the Albert Nelson Marquis Lifetime Achievement Award. He holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

I Me My


Me the people.

34 comments:

Liberal POV said...

HD

You need a new blog name it should be partisan debate. You are anything but honest.

This is an edited out of context hatchet job video.

HD can you not find real issues to honestly debate?

Why do you always want to go petty and silly?

Honest Debate said...

"Why do you always want to go petty and silly?" -LiberalPOV

I don't know lib, it's just the way I am. That's in addition to being a racist, bigot, homophobe, torture relishing, flat-earth believing environmental monster that's been brainwashed by Fox and Rush.

Why do you ask?

Liberal POV said...

HD

Can you not find common problems?

Durg law reform?

Political Reform?

Economy?

Ms Foxx?

Justice?

Ethics?

Honest Debate said...

Lib,

This thread is about our biggest common problem.

Liberal POV said...

HD

Keep it petty and silly. Continue to wade in the shallow end of the think tank.

bridle said...

Really, What a meaningless post. Has anyone done a comparison of how many times other pols use the word "I"? Without a double-blind study comparing speeches from many people in both parties, this means nothing.
And even with such an analysis, it means nothing.
This kind of smear job is essentially praising with faint damns.

Honest Debate said...

At least I'm not in over my head.

Honest Debate said...

Bridle,

Seriously now, do you honestly believe Obama is not an arrogant narcissist?

That's the only point I'm trying to make. You are free to admire him, his policies and vision. He's still who he is.

Please, if you bother to answer my question (I won't challenge your answer, I'm just curious) then answer it without saying the word Bush.

Sarkazein said...

How could it be could considered petty in pointing out a character flaw that may be causing the President of the United States to only realize his own point-of-view?
A flaw that may be causing the deepest divide in modern American political history.
What's worse (worst) is Obama's POV is wrong for America.

Sarkazein said...

scratch the second could in the first sentence above.

Honest Debate said...

Sark,

I vote for "worse". Lib won't understand you either way.

guy faulkes said...

Obama's extensive use of I, Me, My, etc. serves to illustrate that he believes in his own omnipotence. Unfortunately he is not omnipotent. He is not even competent. Bringing this fact to the forefront is not a faint damnation, but the exposure of a serious character flaw in the leader of what is supposed to be the free world.

Sarkazein said...

Bridle wrote-"Really, What a meaningless post. Has anyone done a comparison of how many times other pols use the word "I"? "

Notice Bridle describes Obama as a pol (presumably meaning politician) and not a President.

Sarkazein said...

Speaking of the self-imagined elitists, Mahr is afraid to even answer King's question about Obama. Mahr uses Democrats in general, when answering a direct question about Obama. Here he is actually telling us how all the new Democrat leadership thinks... Americans just aren't intelligent enough to understand the heady issues of our day.

Reader said...

Off topic, Harry Davis is live streamed on goblueridge.com right now. Should have posted at 8 am, sorry.

Sarkazein said...

Obama's poll numbers slip every-time he mentions the "jobs saved" made up number. There are so few people in this country capable of faking an appreciation of "jobs saved".

guy faulkes said...

Off topic. I would like to hear what some of you, particularly Reader and Rico, think of this. It will probably hurt POV's feelings as it does not support his fetish theory.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncGi-sRZqKM&NR=1

Sarkazein said...

LIFE/REALITY doesn't support any of POV's theories.

Sarkazein said...

I've an IDEA, let's elect a President from there!

Sarkazein said...

Our price for Obama's bust Las Vegas comments, 1,500 Millions.

Liberal POV said...

Sark

How about you, HD and Guy list all the greed scandal during the Bush Admin.

Try to be honest. Lets see what you know and what you will admit to?

Remember the fewer you admit to the more dishonest you appear.

Feel free to list that also involved Democrats like Jack Abernoff and Enron.

We'll do sex scandals next.

guy faulkes said...

POV, are you sure you want to go with sex scandals. Your poster children are Clinton and Edwards. Barney Frank and his boyfriend in the housing fiasco might also earn honorable mention or is that a greed scandal?

I have no idea what you are talking about when you speak of greed scandals. Are you talking about the Louisiana purchase? The uniosn payoffs? What?

Now let us address Brown's victory, Bayh's refusal to run for re-election and Moore's persona. Are you ready to answer the questions or are you still running?

How about we stick to the subject of the thread instead of letting POV hijack the thread run?

Sarkazein said...

POV writes-"How about you, HD and Guy list all the greed scandal during the Bush Admin."

If you didn't know better, you'd think POV is starting to believe same ole same ole about Obama rather than the second coming.

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Sheep POV said:

"Can you not find common problems?"

Sure:

1. 2nd Amendment prohibitions
2. Reverse Racism
3. Illegal aliens and the damage they do to this country
4. Socialism
5. Hussein Obama
6. Martial Law in King, NC
7. Liberalism

How's that for starters. If we could solve the above problems, our nation might just be able to progress!!!

Your such an idiot, you know that? LOL

Your ole pal again

Johnny Rico

Johnny Ricos a comin'!!! said...

Guy,

I have to go in to work today and run my company (165 employees) in order to keep Tricycle Lard, Shyster and Liberal Socialist Sheep POV afloat through the tax money that my employees and I must pay. I will watch the youtube video and then create a firestorm of unaswerable questions for the liberals hypocrites who leech off conservatives as they are too lazy, immoral, and stupid to fend for themselves (hence the name sheep). LOL!!!!

Johnny Rico

Craig

bridle said...

HD- No, I don't believe he is arrogant or a narcissist. This description is from Wikipedia. "The narcissist is described as being excessively preoccupied with issues of personal adequacy, power, and prestige "
Those pictures of President Obama bowing that got your knickers in a wad show clearly that he is not arrogant or obsessed with prestige. Nor is there any evidence that he is envious, haughty, or grandiose.
The evidence indicates that he strives to be inclusive and open minded.
Have you compared his use of the word I to that of all the presidents you admire?
If I find a speech by Ronald Reagan with more uses of the word I, would you admit that Reagan was an arrogant narcissist?
Don't you get bored with parroting the latest Republican smear meme?

Honest Debate said...

Bridle,

I guess it's just hard for you to imagine anyone putting party aside when judging character. That's the way you roll, not me.

For the record, I don't believe I've ever said I admired Reagan, not that I don't. It wouldn't have anything to do with him being a Republican. If you found a speech with him saying "I" as much as Obama I would not call him an arrogant narcissist for the simple reason he was not one. You won't find a speech like that anyway. Where did you get the idea that it was the "I,me,my" alone that formed my opinion?

"Those pictures of President Obama bowing that got your knickers in a wad show clearly that he is not arrogant or obsessed with prestige. Nor is there any evidence that he is envious, haughty, or grandiose.
The evidence indicates that he strives to be inclusive and open minded."

Wow. I said I wouldn't challenge your answer so I won't but I am amazed that you can write the above with a straight face.

Wow.

Johnny Rico said...

Mr. Faulks,

Good evening. I watched the excellant video "Women and Guns" you provided. The most surprising thing about this video was not the drastic increase in women taking up shooting, but in the fact that the TV Station that did this segment said NOT ONE THING that I considered negative or anti-gun. This is a first. Hopefully a trend.

As for women and shooting, I believe women are the key to 2nd Amendment freedoms. Think of how hard it would be for politically correct politicans, liberals (POV, Unbrideled Idiot, Tricycle, Shylock), and media to trash a petitie woman shooting a pistol. This trend will only continue as crime begins to rise in deference to the fragmented fiscal policies of the Hussein Obama administration. I guess it is actually good that we have dumb liberals in charge of this country right now - it will show us how important our freedoms really are!!!

Good video Guy. I would recommend it to the liberal socialist sheep on this site, but it is probably far beyond their appalling lack of common sense and intellect. LOL!!!

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Sheep POV:

I see you have decided to dodge the 7 point thesis designed to highlight your stupidity. Here are those 7 points again:

1. 2nd Amendment prohibitions
2. Reverse Racism
3. Illegal aliens and the damage they do to this country
4. Socialism
5. Hussein Obama
6. Martial Law in King, NC
7. Liberalism

If we could adjudicate these problems it would solve many problems we are faced with today. Want to try and tackle a couple of them? Mmmmmm? LOL!!!!

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

PS I won - again. It gets tiring to pound you into an unsubstantial pile of literary liberal dust time and again, you know that? LOL

Grady

Liberal POV said...

Johnny

Okay

1. 2nd Amendment prohibitions
What has you frightened? Under Obama You ( well maybe not you) citizens who have a legal permit to carry may take a weapon into most National Parks.
What's your gripe?
2. Reverse Racism
Could you point me to Western Civilization were blacks controlled the government and whites had to attend schools that receive far less funding?

At what period in history were whites not considered for employment on Fire Dept., Police depts. Were Whites ever refused service in Motels or Restaurants?
Give me your history lesson. How many insolents of reverse racism can you name? Do you suppose for more that have and do happen to blacks?
Ask HD what his opinions are on this one.

"Illegal aliens and the damage they do to this country"

I support reasonable reform. Why do you continue to support the status quo?

Socialism

Please tell me how you and other conservative define what socialism is so I know what you're talking about?
Social Security, Medicare, Pell grants for education, Public schools, Universal Health Care, Living wage

I'm all for them.

Socialism for the rich I'm against. Notice how quick bankers got money from the government after they lost to capitalism?

Whole your at it You tell me what think capitalism is and should be.

Hussein Obama

I think he far too conservative, We should have had universal Health care. We should take the profit out of Health Care. Health care should be like fire or police protection or the military. If you need it it's there.
Beyond that I think he's making great progress considering what a mess he was left.

Martial Law in King, NC

This is your silliest post it took me a long time to understand what the hell you were referring to.
It seems trees and power line were down in King and the Mayor declared a state of emergency to keep motorist off the streets until live power lines could be managed.
The gun fetish people went crazy as this automatically involved a ban on the sell of Alcohol and Ammunition. Did I get that right?

Liberalism
I very proud to be a liberal andthe definitions should explain why.

1open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values : they have more liberal views toward marriage and divorce than some people.
• favorable to or respectful of individual rights and freedoms : liberal citizenship laws.
• (in a political context) favoring maximum individual liberty in political and social reform : a liberal democratic state.
• ( Liberal) of or characteristic of Liberals or a Liberal Party.
• ( Liberal) (in the UK) of or relating to the Liberal Democrat Party : the Liberal leader.
• Theology regarding many traditional beliefs as dispensable, invalidated by modern thought, or liable to change.
2 [ attrib. ] (of education) concerned mainly with broadening a person's general knowledge and experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
3 (esp. of an interpretation of a law) broadly construed or understood; not strictly literal or exact : they could have given the 1968 Act a more liberal interpretation.
4 given, used, or occurring in generous amounts : liberal amounts of wine had been consumed.
• (of a person) giving generously : Sam was too liberal with the wine.
noun
a person of liberal views.
• ( Liberal) a supporter or member of a Liberal Party.

guy faulkes said...

POV, being willing to discard traditional vales such as patriotism, the rule of law, protection of the country from illegal foreign invasion, ignoring the use of race in hiring, doing away with the free market system, capitalism and the concept that one is entitled to be rewarded for his efforts, the concept that one is responsible for his own well being, the ability to worship as one wishes, supporting terrorism, having terrorists as heroes, refusing to support our troops with the interrogation of terrorists, and ignoring the Constitution and Bill of Rights are all indications that you are indeed a liberal and a traitor.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

"POV, being willing to discard traditional vales such as patriotism,"

Carrying a flag so big it blinds you and you end up walking all over it is not patriotism.

"the rule of law,"
That why I'm opposed to torture its illegal.

"protection of the country from illegal foreign invasion"
This is why I support reasonable immigration reform not the status quo.

guy faulkes said...

POV

Torture is illegal. Fortunately water boarding is not.

I am glad to hear you have changed your mind and now support deporting illegal aliens as this is the first step to reasonable immigration reform.

As a you are a traitor, I am not really concerned with your idea of what constitutes patriotism, but it might be interesting to hear. What is your definition?

Blogger said...

In this same speech, Obama makes his claim that he has saved two million jobs. Every time he says that, I am reminded of the man who was asked why he was setting out traps. He replied that he was capturing unicorns. When his questioner responded: “There are no unicorns.” The trap setter proclaimed: “See how effective I have been.”