This blog,originally founded by Blogger, who is listed in Marquis Who's Who and is a recipient of the Albert Nelson Marquis Lifetime Achievement Award. He holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Monday, March 29, 2010

Concealed Carry Laws Save Lives

This is from the belly of the beast, MSNBC. It's the oldest cliche' in the book. It's also the truest: When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns. Here's a great link with PDFs full of facts.

Denny Crane for President.

24 comments:

No Compromise said...

The second amendment does not require me to have a permit to carry a concealed weapon!

guy faulkes said...

No Compromise, you are correct, However, the North Carolina Constitution's gun protection clause does say that the carrying of concealed weapons can be controlled.

This is why the current Supreme Court case is so important. It will clarify states rights, and the rights of counties and municipalities as per limitations of the right to keep and bear arms.

I do not know if anybody clicked on this link from one of HD's links but it is very true and it should be watched.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngsKzdKNAmo&NR=1&feature=fvwp

John Lott shows that the citizens of the United states sucessfully defend themselves with guns over two million times a year. Of course his definition of a successful defense is showing a criminal the gun and the criminal running away. Using Handgun Control's criteria, one had to kill his assailant in order to have sucessfully defended himself. Then that shooting was also used by Handgun Control as evidence of a death that could have been prevented if there were no guns. I recently heard on the radio that murder raetes in D.C. had dropped 25% since the Court ruling on the Heller Case. This is supported by this link.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2461882/posts

HD, this thread is going to cause Liberalproverbs18:2 to soil his loincloth.

Johnny Rico said...

This is great. What is it that Liberal Socialist Lemming Sheep calls us - Foxx Watchers, Hate Mongers, Tea Baggers, etc..

Well, idiot, what have you to say now when one of your very own fringe leftist news agencies reports that more guns equate to fewer crimes here in America? LOL!! A gift from God!!! Yeah!!!

The haters, as you stereotype us, have known about the correlation between gun ownership and crime rates for decades now. And it takes this long for you gun haters to realize it? Or maybe the reason for the MSNBC Report is because they have to. The internet is causing fringe leftist psuedo-news sites like MSNBC to HAVE to report the truth. You see, what is occuring is that as MSNBC tells a lie, it is broadcast immediately via the internet to millions, thus bringing to light the said news site's true intentions.

Take guns and Mexico. Hussein Obama and other socialist sheep like Billary Clinton insinuated that 90% of guns used in Mexican crimes come from the United States. The internet exploded when this now-proven lie hit the press. What Hussein Obmaa and the other socialists hoped to do with this piece of information is what liberal rags had been doing for years - tell a lie long and hard enough that gullible folks like you will actually believe it.

Globalization has thrown a wrench in untruthful journalism and fear mongering from the left (like how I can actually give you an example of the left spreading fear).

Subsequent investigations have proven that 20% or less of guns used in crimes in Mexico come from the United States. The rest come from places like China, Russia, the Mexican Army, and Central America. Notice how Socialists Clinton and Hussein Obama don't use the 90% statistic anymore!!!!

More guns equals less crime. Prove this wrong Liberal Socialist Sheep.

This ought to be interesting!!!!!!!

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

Sarah

PS I won, as usual, and you will try and dodge this one if you can.

Great post Blogger!!!!!!!

guy faulkes said...

Gun control is becoming harder to use as a solution to a nonexistent crisis. If the liberals do not have a crisis to exploit, then they will manufacture one as with guns or man made global warming.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/26/democrats-in-power-hand-victories-to-nra/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/the-nra-outshoots-obama/print/

Liberal POV said...

Guy and Gun Fetish Conservatives


Who is pushing gun control? That gun obsession you folks have helps make the point that you're extremist and have no business holding political power. Hunting weapons or a gun safely store at home is not a gun fetish)
The artist, writers and comedians will prove to be far more powerful when they portray you as baboons.
Sorry, I'm not suppose to ridicle you according to Noam Chomsky.

"Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like it's from Neptune. "
Noam Chomsky

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Sheep said:

"gun obsession you folks have"

And can you define this gun obsession we have? I would really like to hear this!

"you're extremist and have no business holding political power."

So you are saying I am extremist now? How's that? How am I extreme by believing in the Constitution? Does this mean pro-abortion activitst are extremist because they believe in the 4th Amendment? So this must also mean that you think MSNBC is extremist by reporting that more guns equals less crime, right?

So I should not hold political power either? What political power are you speaking of? The proletariat of this country holds the supreme power, the power from which all other power derives - the right to vote. So you think I should not vote because I support the Constitution? I would really like to hear how you arrive at this conclusion!!! LOL!!

You just keep throwing us ammo (no pun intended). LOL!!!

"Hunting weapons or a gun safely store at home is not a gun fetish)"

It may not be a fetish to you, but it may or may not be to others. Who are you to tell me what a fetish is? Maybe you have a "beat down" fetish in which you like to peruse conservative sites because you have a fetish for being beat down time and again by those who are able to articulate their belief systems. LOL!! Funny how you seem to know what is good for the rest of us.

"The artist, writers and comedians will prove to be far more powerful when they portray you as baboons."

You are right. So the writers at MSNBC who produced the newspiece on more guns equaling less crime have done exactly this and have proven to you that you are the baboon here, right? LOL!!! So easy to turn it around on you!!!


In additon to these exceptionally tough questions (for a liberal socialist), are you going to take yet another pass on the tough questions posted in the former thread?

Stings don't it?

Sarah

Johnny Rico

PS I think I am winning this one. What do you think? LOL!!!

Sarkazein said...

Johny Rico Sarah wrote-"Maybe you have a "beat down" fetish in which you like to peruse conservative sites because you have a fetish for being beat down time and again by those who are able to articulate their belief systems."

This would explain alot.

guy faulkes said...

I took the liberty of copying these from another thread as I think they belong here.

Liberal POV said...

Johnny

I strongly support hunting and sportsman and believe license fees and habitat preservation groups like duck unlimited are some of the best environmentalist.

I do see these groups different than gun fetish nuts wanting asault weapons and those that would trade their childrens future for the right to own a military style weapon. Please don't give me a lesson the details.

Ms Foxx and Mr Whitener are owned by Banking, Insurance and Tobacco. Ms Foxx is kept in office by fear media drivin issues. The trick is to get those that live poor to vote rich and it has worked.

March 28, 2010 3:33 PM
guy faulkes said...

Liberalproverbs18:2, please inform me of your definition of an assault weapon and how it functions any differently than a hunting gun. Also please refer me to the portion of the Bill of Rights or any of the papers of the founders,that refers to hunting being the reason or for the second amendment.

The second amendment is your God given right to own a weapon with which to defend yourself from a tyrannical government.

You do not want a lesson in the details because you have nothing to support your opinion. You just want to chant La La La La La without being held accountable.

March 29, 2010 11:29 AM

Liberal POV said...

Guy

"Liberalproverbs18:2, please inform me of your definition of an assault weapon and how it functions any differently than a hunting gun."

The greatest difference is the mind set behind the weapons.

The mind that chooses weapons designed for the purpose of killing fellow human beings and willing to spend large sums of money on multiple weapons may have some issues that I'm calling a gun fetish.
That same person after spending thousands of dollars on weapons will complain about a tax to send his kids to a better school.

guy faulkes said...

Liberalproverbs18:2

You evaded the question. How does a gun you do not like function differently from one you say is acceptable? How are you going to ban one and not the other? Why do you consider collecting guns any different than collecting stamps? What makes you remotely think you have the right to decide how others use their constitutional rights? I know you are a traitor, and a supporter of terrorists and pedophiles, but when did you get elected God in your own mind? How much money do you spend on things and why do you do it? What makes that anyone's business but yours? What makes you so cowardly that you do not believe in your responsibility to provide for the safety of yourself and your family? As you bring up schools in an effort to hijack the thread, why do you oppose vouchers to enable one to send his kids to the school of his choice?

By the way, for the rest of you, I just shot an AR15 in 6.8 MM or .270 caliber. It will make an excellent hunting gun as it is more powerful than the .223 round that Libralproverbs18:2 so fears and is so anemic that it is not legal to hunt deer with on public lands. Of course the .223 will do the job fine on private land if you are a competent marksman.

Liberalproverbs18:2, how do you feel about the fact one has to make the "assault rifle" you deplore a larger caliber in order to legally hunt with it on public lands?

Sarkazein said...

POV driveled -"The greatest difference is the mind set behind the weapons."


Freedom, unrecognized by Socialist POV.
YOU should much rather pay want to pay more taxes to a blotted bureaucracy than use your own money for your own purposes.
In fact, you should also not be allowed to complain about those taxes and their use.
You, Socialist POV, are an example of America's worst.

Sarkazein said...

Above should read: you should much rather want to pay...

Sarkazein said...

I ask liberals: If you had to be shot, and you had your choice, would you rather be shot with a 12 gauge shotgun using buckshot, or an AR15 with a .223 round, both at 25 feet away?

guy faulkes said...

Liberalproverbs18:2, after some consideration of your post, I realized you have inadvertently made a point you are going to hate. This point is "The greatest difference is the mind set behind the weapons."

By saying this you are admitting the gun has nothing to do with violence. It is the criminal perpetuating the act of violent aggression that is to blame. We have always known this, but your admission of it is startling.

I will offer an example. I once saw a man stab another man with a pencil in the throat. The victim did not die because of quick access to medical help, but it illustrates that there is no such thing as dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous people. For this reason, it is wise to carry a concealed handgun for protection as it is the most effective method of defending yourself available.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

"How are you going to ban one and not the other?"

I know of no movements nationally or locally for gun bans?


The assaults weapons illustrate can used to show how crazy the right wing groups are.

Liberal POV said...

Sark

"I ask liberals: If you had to be shot, and you had your choice, would you rather be shot with a 12 gauge shotgun using buckshot, or an AR15 with a .223 round, both at 25 feet away?
"

You have some strange fantasies.

guy faulkes said...

Liberproverbs18:2, Your liberal masters are proposing to reinstate the "assault weapons" ban. are you falling behind in worship of the gospels of the man-child Messiah and his disciples?

You have already admitted guns have nothing to do with causing crimes, only with preventing them. However, I would like to hear the answers to my questions. Do I have to start repeating them on every thread in reply to your every post in order to get you to answer them?

Lets start with your opinion on having to make an AR a larger caliber in order be able to legally hunt on public lands? What does that do to your assault weapons theory?

Liberal POV said...

Guy


Take a look at this study.

http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/research/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/index.html

Liberal POV said...

Guy

Is Canada a free country?

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2005/06/28/gun-deaths050628.html

Liberal POV said...

Guy

Looking at just the facts below which is the safest country?

http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/cdic-mcc/19-1/d_e.html

guy faulkes said...

Liberalproverbs18:2, Your Harvard link is completely in error. It is a biased study done by left wing liberals. I would refer you to the Book More Guns, Less Crime by John Lott.

You choose the wrong country when you speak of Canada. First of all Canada is repealing its gun registration laws that costs millions and did nothing to lower crime rates. Canada does not have the illegal alien problems that include drugs, violence, and (your favorites) prostitution (especially pedophilia), and terrorism.

There are many different causes for crime. None of them is the availability of guns. As you admitted earlier, people cause crime, not guns. I believe yous said it had to do with mind set.

http://www.cdnshootingsports.org/2009/11/we_did_it_c391.html

To answer your question, Canada is a socialist country. Take their inferior health care system, which even their officials avoid and which causes ordinary people to face the rationing of health care, long waits, and death panels, for example.

guy faulkes said...

Liberalproverbs18:2, I forgot to ask but will try to remember to continue to do so after every post you make on every thread until you do.

Lets start with your opinion on having to make an AR a larger caliber in order be able to legally hunt on public lands? What does that do to your assault weapons theory?

Also please refer me to the portion of the Bill of Rights or any of the papers of the founders,that refers to hunting being the reason or for the second amendment.

How does a gun you do not like function differently from one you say is acceptable? How are you going to ban one and not the other? Why do you consider collecting guns any different than collecting stamps? What makes you remotely think you have the right to decide how others use their constitutional rights? I know you are a traitor, and a supporter of terrorists and pedophiles, but when did you get elected God in your own mind? How much money do you spend on things and why do you do it? What makes that anyone's business but yours? What makes you so cowardly that you do not believe in your responsibility to provide for the safety of yourself and your family? As you bring up schools in an effort to hijack the thread, why do you oppose vouchers to enable one to send his kids to the school of his choice?

Please answer the questions so we can move on.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

I have likely been places you would have peed you pants and I have never wished I had a gun.

I do have an unloaded weapon stored some where in my home.

guy faulkes said...

Liberalproverbs18:2, what does where you have been have to do with your running from the questions that you have been asked.

I really could care less about the dives you may frequent. Hopefully they are not houses of prostitution featuring underage "undocumented workers". That would be worse than your associations with your terrorist heroes.

I have often heard it said that the safest thing to be when confronted by a social deviant is another social deviant. However, I do not believe it as they seem to kill each other with quite some regularity. You may indeed be brave in this respect.

Now, how about answering the questions?