This blog,originally founded by Blogger, who is listed in Marquis Who's Who and is a recipient of the Albert Nelson Marquis Lifetime Achievement Award. He holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.

Monday, April 5, 2010

Unintended Consequences


The sign reads: "If you voted for Obama... Seek urological care elsewhere. Changes to your health care begin right now. Not in four years."
Logic would dictate he's not the only one.

40 comments:

Liberal POV said...

HD

This sounds like a misinfored,sore lossing, mean sprited unethical Republican doctor to me.

Reader said...

I doubt this is what the liberals wanted to see happen HD. Surprise, surprise. I'm glad I didn't vote for change.

Liberal POV said...

HD and Reader

Do you consider this doctor ethical? Is it ethical to withhold medical treatment for political beliefs?

Suppose the administrator of a local hospital who may benefit from the New Health Care Bill refused to admit known Republicans?

Do you folks need lessons in basic ethics?

Honest Debate said...

He is not withholding treatment from anyone. There's nothing unethical about it. "Political beliefs" aren't the issue. It's the government takeover of private enterprise. There will be more like this and it will be compounded by less people aspiring to be doctors.

Liberal POV said...

HD

"It's the government takeover of private enterprise."

There's less take over of private enterprise than requiring private restaurants or motels to serve people of color.

Do you want a return to the old south?

The little harm that may be suffered by the doctor is nothing compared to 30 million outside the health care system. The doctorcould have a small loss of income if anything but those without health care could die.

Want to do a thread on ethics?

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/

http://www.ethics.org/

http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/no-index/physician-resources/2416.shtml

Sarkazein said...

In the liberal single-payer plan, doctors would have to be forced at gunpoint to accept patients. The end of freedom.

Sarkazein said...

POV- The turn back to the old south, would be the making of doctors as slaves. The State would force them to practice and pay them what they could afford... against the doctor's will. The slaves of the old south were paid in room and board, and probably healthcare, but they had no choice on anything.
It was a stupit comment answered with an equally stupit comment.

Liberal POV said...

Sark

The doctor will be paid what's the problem? The Doctor has no right to refuse to treat people because of you they choose to vote for.

Reader said...

This doctor isn't refusing to treat anyone...Lib, you did watch the interview with him didn't you? I doubt it. This is just a taste to what is coming.

I wonder how many doctors are conservatives and how many are liberals? You can go to the liberal ones Lib and I'll go to the conservative ones. There's your answer and you don't have to show any hate.

I'll bet this doctor will be vandalized, whatcha want to bet?

Sarkazein said...

Reader-
They (doctors) have already been demonized by Obama. Vandalized can't be far off.
POV says as long as someone is paid for their services, the government can control them. Money is every thing to the Left... other's money that is.

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Sheep POV said:

"Do you want a return to the old south?"

None of us do, but you do. When you disarm Negros through socialist gun control laws you are indeed returning to the old South that you purport to hate. Have you seen the video entitled "No Guns for Negros"? In it you will find your vision for the New South. LOL!!!


This ought to be interesting

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Lemming POV said:

"Want to do a thread on ethics?"

No, because you are unable to answer to the truth bashing that we will inevitably give you if we did!!! LOL!!! You have about 129 questions that have gone unanswered to this point! Not very ethical to stir the pot while refusing to acknowledge those with whom you have an arguement with now is it? LOL!!!


Sarah

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

Liberal POV said...

HD

We have the voice and temperament of the current republican party with Johnny.

Sarkazein said...

POV- YOU equate anti-socialism to racism, and you complain about temperament?
YOU are the face of the Leftist race baiting Democrat Party. You cannot win.

Wolf's head said...

"Do you want a return to the old south?"LPOV

Oh, you mean when the democrats were running things? Like segregation, blue laws, lynchings, corruption, the KKK and snake handlers?

THAT is the democratic party. And NO, we don't want to return to it.

Anonymous said...

Much ado about nothing.

Liberal POV said...

Wolf

Most of today's white south vote republican, that all started after the civil rights movement.

Republicans have no ideas, no plan, just fear and hate.

Liberal POV said...

Wolf

Most of today's white south vote republican, that all started after the civil rights movement.

Republicans have no ideas, no plan, just fear and hate.

Sarkazein said...

For starters, Obama made a special point, a flourish really, of wearing a mitt and donning a Chicago White Sox cap to go with his Nationals warm-up jacket. This was a planned gesture aimed at establishing his authenticity as a legitimate fan, a hometown White Sox fan. Both new Comiskey and old Comiskey Park are located on the South Side of Chicago, the locus of Obama’s political power. However, later on during the game, in a radio broadcast booth, when asked to name his favorite White Sox player, he could not come up with anyone. What genuine fan cannot name a single player on his home team? (One thinks immediately of that Back Bay man of the people Kerry, who famously said his favorite Red Sox player was “Manny Ortiz.” ) In other words, the president is not really a White Sox fan. He just adopted that pose, as Hillary Clinton once did with regard to the Yankees, for reasons of political and electoral public relations.
His delivery of the first pitch itself was also very telling in a way that goes beyond words. Going into a full left-handed windup, practiced beforehand to achieve verisimilitude, Obama then turned to deliver to the plate and twisted into the classic girlish strangled overhand motion – as if trying to shoo away a fly, or make a shot put. This was not the practiced arm motion of someone who actually has played baseball. Why all the false set-up? What was he trying to prove? Remember when George W. Bush threw out the first pitch for the World Series after 9/11? No mitt. No fake hometown cap. He just smiled and casually burned a fastball right down the middle.-Jake Boot

Liberal POV said...

Sark

Soo Bush is good at baseball and Obama is good at being president?

guy faulkes said...

Soo Bush is good at baseball and Obama is good at being president? I do not know how Bush was a t baseball, but Obama has surpassed Carter as the worst President in American history.

Liberalproverbs18:2, do I need to re-post the questions you are running from? Every day you do not answer them, you look prove you cannot support your opinions, thereby making your opinions worthless.

guy faulkes said...

Liberalproverbs18:3, I decided I had better re=post the questions, least you forget.

Lets start with your opinion on having to make an AR a larger caliber in order be able to legally hunt on public lands? What does that do to your assault weapons theory?

Also please refer me to the portion of the Bill of Rights or any of the papers of the founders,that refers to hunting being the reason or for the second amendment.

What is your rebuttal to the video No Guns For Negroes by the Jews for Preservation of Firearms?

How does a gun you do not like function differently from one you say is acceptable? How are you going to ban one and not the other? Also, we can add how is a sniper rifle is different than a deer rifle, as you attacked sniper rifles? Why do you consider collecting guns any different than collecting stamps? What makes you remotely think you have the right to decide how others use their constitutional rights? I know you are a traitor, and a supporter of terrorists and pedophiles, but when did you get elected God in your own mind? How much money do you spend on things and why do you do it? What makes that anyone's business but yours? What makes you so cowardly that you do not believe in your responsibility to provide for the safety of yourself and your family?

Please answer the questions so we can move on.

Sarkazein said...

POV- If you mean being a complete phony who throws like a girl is your idea of a good President, then he is your better President.
Augy Bear floats a trial ballon about VAT. A tax on not only everyone's money, but another move toward European socialism. A grease ball thrown girlishly by your President.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

I have no gun fetish so your video does not interest me.

You seem obsessed with guns, is you manhood so small you need a big gun to feel secure as a man?

guy faulkes said...

liberalproverbs18:2, you stated opinions. Now answer the questions to support them.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

Thanks for the opportunity.How big a truck do you drive?

"small penis syndrome 4 up, 2 down
buy small penis syndrome mugs, tshirts and magnets
Any man who feels so inadequate about his penis size that he compensates for it by buying ridiculously large shit he doesn't need. This usually involves buying the biggest truck they can, raising it and putting airplane tires on it. Owning 20 or more large guns, talking about being violent or making threats when they are cowardice. And sleeping with big women to feel adequate, because they lack self esteem. They usually tend to hit, disrespect or yell at women. This may be because women won't/can't sit on their tiny dick. They also usually have a shit load of kids because they try to wear XL condoms, thus leading to unwanted kids whom they also beat and yell at.
Anyone with a unnecessary raised truck with huge tires, lots of guns, a huge 7 room house, or a reputation for lying about themselves in general, yet still doesn't have a goddamn woman. This can make them have small penis syndrome."

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=small%20penis%20syndrome

http://open.salon.com/blog/esse_est_percipi/2009/06/21/five_guns_that_are_clearly_compensating_for_a_tiny_penis

guy faulkes said...

Liberalproverbs18:2, have you been out with BB again?

Once again, you resort to personal attacks because you cannot defend you statements. Answer the questions to give us the reasons for your previous statements and insinuations or admit you did not know what you were talking about. Guns are not the issue here. Your methodology in making posts is. Show us you can support what you say.

Why are you fixated on the size of my penis? AS Rico indicated, being slapped around must give you some kind of thrill. I am sorry but I am heterosexual and so am not interested in your advances. (I assume you are a man.) Besides, I have been happily married for 40 years. In any case, I would not date from the internet.

Liberal POV said...

Guy

I'm just trying to understand your gun fetish.

Sarkazein said...

So POV, you are what YOU call a good representative of a liberal?

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Sheep POV said:

"is you manhood so small you need a big gun to feel secure as a man?"

What if you are a woman like me who owns and advocates for gun ownership and rights? Your tired old stereotype of gun owners does not work in the modern age. Perhaps you should read and educate yourself before making a typically liberal-stupid statement such as this. Did you know that us women make up the most rapidly growing segment of society in terms of new gun owners? Of course you didn't, your too busy taking guns away from blacks and other minorities in the name of "progress".

LOL! That was easy. Have you seen the video entitled "No Guns For Negros" yet? LOL!

Have you answered to my post concerning 10 examples of liberals socialists like yourself trying to disarm Americans? LOL!

Have you answered to my post proving that Americans annually donate more food, medicine and money to those in need than ALL other countries combined? LOL!

Have you answered my post asking what exactly you would tell all the out of work stone masons, house painters, dry wallers, young boys mowing grass in the summer, and other residents after you accused them of being lazy and deserving of illegal aliens taking their jobs? LOL!

Have you answered to my post concerning the fact that liberal socialists such as you use intimidation tactics and racism on those who don't agree with your beliefs (ie. Black Panther Muslims outside voting centers and Pelosi calling tea Partiers, "Nazis"? LOL!

And the other hundred odd questions that you cannot seem to answer? LOL!!

Stings not having the moral or ethical basis to answer simple questions doesn't it?

LOL!!

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

PS This ought to be interesting.

Liberal POV said...

Johnny

Are you legally allowed to have a weapon?

I for some reason think you could be unable to prove sanity or a non violent history. Things like a criminal record could be a problem for legal gun ownership.

Sarkazein said...

Unintended consequences or a pay back for Bill Clinton's support of Obama care?

CRS: Health Law May Allow Viagra Coverage for Sex Offenders
April 7, 2010, 12:42pm
By John Stanton
Roll Call Staff

The Congressional Research Service confirmed in a memo Wednesday that rapists and sex offenders may get federally subsidized Viagra and other sexual performance enhancing drugs under the recently passed health care reform law — information that Republicans charge will haunt Democrats in upcoming elections.

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Sheep POV said:

"Are you legally allowed to have a weapon?"

Are you still unable to answer simple questions that even a retard could grunt to? LOL!!! Bet your parents are proud!

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

Johnny "Stinger" Rico said...

Still waiting Liberal Lemming Socialist Sheep POV. Still waiting for an answer to those stinging questions!!!

Liberal POV said...

Sark

Notice the sensationalism in your last post. Why do I believe when the details are researched the truth will not be as you posted?

You still can't admit William Jefferson Clinton was the best President of your life time measured by the economic stability, deficit, jobs, income of Americans, stock market, increeased wealth of Americans, military engagements, casualties due to war or any other measurment. I might add he and Hilliary have been married longer than most Republicans in Washington and will you apply your self rightousness to Republicans like Newt or others?

Johnny Rico said...

Liberal Socialist Sheep POV:

Still waiting for an answer to the bevy of questions you have been saddled with. Are you unable to answer because you have a short attention span or because you don't have the requisite moral and ethical foundations to do so? Whichever one it is, you have been exposed as a pretender once again. Stings don't it?

Your ole pal

Johnny Rico

PS Oh yes, the primary question of how and why you support Pedophilia is something we would all like to hear!!

Sarah

Sarkazein said...

POV- To you, a marriage might be living in different houses in different cities poking different people, but you are goofy.
The day I ever think Clinton was more than a draft dodging, philanderer, with a nose like a vacuum cleaner (according to his bro), flasher pervert, is the day I trip out on whatever you've been tripping on to the point of fried.

Johnny Rico said...

Still waiting for an answer Liberal Socialist Sheep POV?

Johnny Rico said...

Uh oh. Looks like Liberal Socialist Sheep has cut and run again!! Hard questions aren't much fun when you don't have the moral or ethical basis from which to answer them!

LOL

You ole pal

Johnny Rico

Sarkazein said...

POV asks-"Sark

Notice the sensationalism in your last post. Why do I believe when the details are researched the truth will not be as you posted?"


Because you are sheeple, and you have not been told yet that you can believe it.