This blog,originally founded by Blogger, who is listed in Marquis Who's Who and is a recipient of the Albert Nelson Marquis Lifetime Achievement Award. He holds a theological degree and a doctorate in Counseling Psychology. Taught Psychology for 32 years and is now Professor Emeritus. Is a board-certified psychologist and was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award in his profession. Ministered as a chaplain, and pastored Baptist and Episcopal churches. Publications cover the integration of psychology and theology. Served in the Army, the Merchant Marines and the Peace Corps.
Tuesday, September 17, 2019
Nasty Nadler and His Faux Impeachment Hearings
The four takeaways I will mention however, are the following:
Because the Mueller report on collusion is ended, the Demoncrats have switched to obstruction of justice, specifically Lewandosky’s knowledge of whether or not Trump threatened to fire Sessions if he would not limit the witch hunt. Lewandosky finessed that one like a pro. One Republican finally did ask Lewandosky if he realized that under the Second Amendment Trump could fire anyone he needed to? The answer was "yes" That should have closed the witch hunt before it even began.
Chairman Nasty Nadler kept insisting that they were not in an impeachment hearing. Then when he changed the rules arbitrarily, he claimed it was impeachment. Then he kept threatening Lewandosky with contempt, citing rules of impeachment hearings established in the Nixon impeachment. Nadler knew he can’t start impeachment without the vote of the House and he does not have the votes so far. The whole thing is a farce.
Over and over Lewandosky protected himself by citing the president’s executive privilege letter to the committee. Many of the committees declared the president’s letter illegal. If they all weren’t typical stupid Dems with a stupid audience, they would confess that in a challenge between two government branches, the legality would have to be settled by the court, most likely the Supreme Court.
Finally, many Republicans said that this committee was historically a significant one. They reeled off a number of truly important issues they can’t work on because of Nadler’s love of the flash bulbs.